8-K
SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
Current
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of
Earliest Event Reported) July 10, 2003
Pope Resources, A
Delaware Limited Partnership (Exact name of
registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
91-1313292
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
19245
Tenth Avenue NE, Poulsbo, Washington 98370
(Address of principal executive offices) (ZIP
Code) |
Registrants telephone
number, including area code (360) 697-6626
NOT APPLICABLE
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)
|
INFORMATION TO BE
INCLUDED IN THE REPORT
Item 5. OTHER EVENTS
AND REGULATION FD DISCLOSURE
On July 10, 2003 the
registrant provided the attached presentation to certain parties interested in
Pope Resources units. A copy of that presentation is attached hereto as Exhibit
99.1.
Item 7. FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.1 |
|
Presentation
dated July 10, 2003 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of
Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
DATE: July 10, 2003 |
|
POPE RESOURCES,
A DELAWARE LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
BY: /s/ Thomas M. Ringo
Thomas M. Ringo
Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, Pope
Resources, A
Delaware Limited Partnership, and
Pope MGP, Inc.,
General Partner |
EX-99.1
Exhibit 99.1
Presentation dated July 10, 2003
|
POPE
RESOURCES
July 2003 Overview
|
|
Safe Harbor
This presentation contains
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to a
number of risks and should not be relied upon as predictions of future events.
Some of the forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of
forward-looking words such as believes, expects,
may, will, should, seeks,
approximately, intends, plans,
estimates, projects, strategy or
anticipates or the negative of those words or other comparable
terminology. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and
uncertainties. A number of important factors could cause actual results to
differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. Some
of these factors include, but are not limited to: changes in forestry, land use,
environmental, and other governmental regulations; risk of losses from fires,
floods, windstorms, and other natural disasters; risk of loss from insect
infestations or tree diseases; changes in economic conditions and competition in
our domestic and export markets; an unanticipated reduction in the demand for
timber products and/or an unanticipated increase in the supply of timber
products; and other factors described from time to time in our filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
Origin & Historical
Outline
|
|
|
|
|
Spin-off
from Pope & Talbot in December 1985 |
|
|
|
|
Came
out at $2.32/unit (adjusted for 5:1 split in 1997) |
|
|
|
|
Currently
trading at $11.85/unit with 4.5 million units outstanding |
|
|
|
|
Three
distinct eras, with each characterized by the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay
down spin-off debt through timber harvests and land sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Create
positive equity value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Create
new service fee income stream |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
two major clients for timberland management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scale
back overbuilt infrastructure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sell
real estate operations in Port Ludlow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
45,000 acres from Plum Creek |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Establish
platform for future growth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two
corporate GPs own collectively about 1.5% of Pope Resources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each
of GPs owned 50/50 by Peter Pope and his cousin, Emily Andrews |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$150,000/year
management fee, unchanged since spin-off |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sliding-scale
profit-sharing interest in third-party service subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private
Capital Management at 36% (initial stake in 1993) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Family
position at 22% (including GP interest) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited
other institutional ownership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over
one-third held by retail investors |
Pope
Resources Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,000
acres of timberland in western Washington |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Producing
45 MMBF of annual log harvest (non-declining harvest level) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002
revenue of $23.3 M, operating income of $10.2 M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
year-round employees |
|
|
|
|
Timberland
Management & Consulting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managing
nearly 100,000 additional acres in western U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
One
primary management client |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002
revenue of $7.3 M, operating income of $0.9 M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results
will be very different in 2003, with expiration of Hancock contract at 12/31/02 and sale
of Pioneer lands during 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
acres of higher and better use properties near population centers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seeking
development entitlements to add value to land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership
and management of historic mill town of Port Gamble |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002
revenue of $1.6 M, operating loss of $800,000 (excludes special charges that reconcile to
loss of $1.7 M as outlined in Form 10-K) |
|
|
|
|
Free
cash flow*, after debt service and distributions, of $3 to $4 million per year, depending
on log prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used
for co-investment in ORM Timber Fund I, L.P. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opportunistically
pursue fee (owned) timberland acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where
appropriate, invest in real estate projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential
to increase unit distribution with excess cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
No
current expectation for secondary offering of units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency
too cheap to issue new units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximately
$15 to $20 million of incremental debt capacity, depending upon the value of Units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintain
debt to total capitalization at 50% or less (46% at end of Q1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Near-term
growth fueled primarily by organic cash flow generation |
|
|
|
|
Maintain
modest unit distribution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
annual distribution policy is $0.20 per unit |
* |
|
Free
Cash Flow defined as net income before depletion, depreciation, and cost of land
sold, but after capital expenditures and debt principal payments |
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of Columbia tree farm in 2001 from Plum Creek filled age-class gap and leveled off age
classes older than 30 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-declining
harvest of 45 MMBF for next decade, before gradual increase over ensuing decades
(reaching 65 MMBF eventually) |
|
|
|
|
Look
to add to fee (owned) timberland base |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
likely to be dilutive to earnings initially |
|
|
|
|
|
|
New
properties will be additive to asset values |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opportunistic/contrarian
approach to timber acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
Much
of fee timber growth will come through co-investment in new ORM Timber Fund I, L.P. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Will
allow Pope Resources to participate in acquisition economies associated with larger
transactions |
Productive
Acres and Inventory by Age Class
|
|
Timberland Management
& Consulting Strategy
|
|
|
|
|
Manage
timberlands for third-party clients |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full-service
management, selected forestry consulting services, workout specialist |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Focus
development of expert processes/tools, and market presence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ancillary
benefits accrue to fee timber properties through management expertise and economies of
scale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fit
with broad ownership trends in industry |
|
|
|
|
Raise
capital for investing in timberlands: ORM Timber Fund I, L.P. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$50
million of equity capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10%
co-investment by Pope Resources and affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Up
to 50% additional debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ORMLLC
will serve as GP |
|
|
|
|
Push
real estate properties through entitlement and permitting pipeline |
|
|
|
|
|
|
To
point where sale opportunity is optimal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May
retain selected properties where management is passive and income stream is steady with
upside |
|
|
|
|
Major
early-stage entitlement projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gig
Harbor - 320 acre mixed-use project within city limits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
rezone effort underway |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New
Tacoma Narrows bridge impact |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bremerton
- - 230 acre mixed-use project with 15 year development agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kingston
- - 710 acre project subject to urban growth boundary determination |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hansville
- - 210 acre project granted preliminary plat approval for 89 lots |
|
|
|
|
Port
Gamble historic mill town is a many-faceted, long-term project |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rural
historic town designation under States Growth Management Act |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
rights recently secured |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental
cleanup underway |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sewer
system expansion needed for build-out of town site |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long
term: development of former mill site and remaining portion of town site |
Financial Performance
Ten-Year Summary
|
|
(All
amounts in $ millions, except per unit data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1993 |
|
|
1994 |
|
|
1995 |
|
|
1996 |
|
|
1997 |
|
|
1998 |
|
|
1999 |
|
|
2000 |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee
Timber |
|
25.7 |
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
26.6 |
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
23.3 |
Timberland
Mgmnt
& Consulting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
7.3 |
Real
Estate |
|
8.6 |
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
1.6 |
Total
Revenues |
|
34.3 |
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
43.0 |
|
|
50.9 |
|
|
50.6 |
|
|
47.8 |
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Income/(Loss) |
|
14.8 |
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
3.3 |
Net
Income/(Loss) per Unit |
$ |
3.00 |
|
$ |
1.93 |
|
$ |
2.90 |
|
$ |
1.84 |
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
$ |
1.94 |
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
$ |
(1.38 |
) |
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDDA* |
|
18.3 |
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
10.6 |
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Cash Flow |
|
20.1 |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timberland
Harvest (MMBF) |
|
36.3 |
|
|
29.7 |
|
|
37.9 |
|
|
31.6 |
|
|
33.2 |
|
|
38.9 |
|
|
42.0 |
|
|
37.3 |
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
45.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unitholder
Distributions
per Unit |
$ |
1.20 |
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unit
Trading Prices: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
$ |
16.40 |
|
$ |
18.80 |
|
$ |
21.80 |
|
$ |
23.40 |
|
$ |
31.00 |
|
$ |
32.50 |
|
$ |
35.00 |
|
$ |
29.25 |
|
$ |
24.50 |
|
$ |
15.50 |
Low |
$ |
9.60 |
|
$ |
14.40 |
|
$ |
15.25 |
|
$ |
15.80 |
|
$ |
17.40 |
|
$ |
24.06 |
|
$ |
27.88 |
|
$ |
19.00 |
|
$ |
14.00 |
|
$ |
9.30 |
* EBITDA = Net income
before interest expense, interest income, taxes, depreciation, depletion, and
amortization. Used as a measure of liquidity.
Q1 2003 Financial
Results
|
|
(All
amounts in $ millions, except per unit data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q1
2003 |
|
|
Q4
2002 |
|
|
Q1
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee
Timber |
|
6.8 |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
4.0 |
|
Timberland
Mgmnt & Consulting |
|
0.4 |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
1.6 |
|
Real
Estate |
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
Total
Revenues |
|
7.3 |
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
1.3 |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
Net Income
per Unit |
$ |
0.29 |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDDA |
|
3.0 |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Cash Flow |
|
1.9 |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timberland
Harvest (MMBF) |
|
13.2 |
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution
(per Unit) |
$ |
0.05 |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
$ |
|
Log Markets and
Harvest Mix
|
Estimated
2003 Harvest Mix
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Grade
Balance Sheet
|
|
(in
$millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
31-Mar-03 |
|
31-Dec-02 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
Cash |
6.2 |
|
6.6 |
|
Other
Current Assets |
1.7 |
|
2.3 |
|
Properties
and Equipment |
73.2 |
|
73.8 |
|
Other
Assets |
3.7 |
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Assets |
84.8 |
|
86.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
& Equity |
|
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities (excl. Current Debt) |
2.1 |
|
3.6 |
|
Total
Debt |
37.7 |
|
39.2 |
|
Other
Liabilities |
0.4 |
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Liabilities |
40.2 |
|
43.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
44.6 |
|
43.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Liabilities & Equity |
84.8 |
|
86.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
price approximates book value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fraction
of liquidation value by any measure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tarred
unfairly by problems facing two other timber publicly traded partnerships |
|
|
|
|
Great
time to invest in timber asset class |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio
diversification benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strong
asset class track record |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset
values have fallen substantially |
|
|
|
|
Tax
attributes meaningful to sophisticated individual investors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield
component associated with arbitrage between tax rate applicable to capital gains and
ordinary income |
|
|
|
|
Growing
value, not necessarily near-term earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Best
suited to long-term holder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ideal
for long-term wealth accumulation or for passing wealth to future generations |
|
|
|
|
Modest
distribution yield |
Tax Advantages of
Investing in Pope Resources Units
|
|
A |
|
B |
|
C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pope
Res 1065
Aggregate
Amounts
Reported
|
Per
Unit
Amounts
|
Applicable
Tax
Rate
|
Resultant
Tax (Liab)/
Benefit
(B times -C)
|
Tax
Yield at Various Unit Prices |
|
$
10.00 |
|
$
12.00 |
|
$
14.00 |
|
$
16.00 |
|
Old
Tax Rates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K-1
Taxable Income |
1,500,000 |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1231
gain |
11,700,000 |
|
$ |
2.59 |
|
20.0% |
|
$ |
(0.52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Int
income |
300,000 |
|
|
0.07 |
|
38.6% |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ord
loss |
(10,500,000 |
) |
|
(2.32 |
) |
38.6% |
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
3.5% |
|
2.9% |
|
2.5% |
|
2.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New
Tax Rates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K-1
Taxable Income |
1,500,000 |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1231
gain |
11,700,000 |
|
$ |
2.59 |
|
15.0% |
|
$ |
(0.39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Int
income |
300,000 |
|
|
0.07 |
|
35.0% |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ord
loss |
(10,500,000 |
) |
|
(2.32 |
) |
35.0% |
|
|
0.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
4.0% |
|
3.3% |
|
2.9% |
|
2.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Income amounts
provided are representative examples only and should not be interpreted as pro
forma results. As such, the amounts shown in this slide represent management's
estimates based on general tax principles. Individual tax consequences will
vary from investor to investor, and you should consult with your own tax advisor
about the specific tax consequences in light of your own investment and income
profile.
Why Has Unit Price
Suffered?
|
|
|
|
|
Small
market cap combined with limited public float |
|
|
|
|
Limited
appeal to institutional holders (UBTI issue) |
|
|
|
|
Suspension
of cash distributions in 2000 |
|
|
|
|
Uneven
nature of cash flows |
|
|
|
|
Losses
associated with the sale of Port Ludlow |
|
|
|
|
Columbia
tree farm acquisition dilutive to near-term earnings |
|
|
|
|
Loss
of Hancock contract and closure of Canadian offices |
|
|
|
|
Private
Capital Management no longer adding to position |
Unit Price History
Daily Trading Activity
|
Daily
Trading Activity
|
|
Unit Price History
Percent Trading Days Per Month
|
Percent
Trading Days per Month
|
|
Unit Price History
Monthly Trading Volume
|
Monthly
Trading Volume
|
|
Unit Price History
Trade Frequency & Avg. Trade Size
|
Monthly
Trading Frequency and Average Trade Size
|
|
Pope Resources -
Summary of Opportunity
|
|
|
|
|
Pope
Resources units represent intriguing upside potential with limited downside risk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading
at 11 times trailing earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extraordinarily
deep discount to NAV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
consequences of recent restructurings behind us |
|
|
|
|
Highly
tax-efficient vehicle for investing in timberland asset class |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Modest
distribution yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compelling
diversification benefits of timberland asset class |
|
|
|
|
Growth
strategy for use of free cash flow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Invest
in ORM Timber Fund I, L.P. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opportunistic
acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increases
in distribution level |
|
|
|
|
Improved
alignment between unitholders and management with insider open-market buying in past year |
|
POPE
RESOURCES |
|
|