SEC Filing | Rayonier Inc.

View:

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

Form 10-Q

\|X\|	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004

OR

\|_\|	TRANSACTION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 1-9035

POPE RESOURCES, A DELAWARE
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		91-1313292
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification Number)

19245 10th Avenue NE, Poulsbo, WA 98370
Telephone: (360) 697-6626
(Address of principal executive offices including zip code)
(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes |X| No |_|

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934).

Yes |_| No |X|

Partnership units outstanding at June 30, 2004: 4,521,995

Pope Resources
Index to Form 10-Q Filing
For the Quarter and Six Month Period Ended June 30, 2004

Description	Page Number

Part I. Financial Information

Item 1 Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets	4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations	5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	6
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	12

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Risk	29

Item 4. Controls and Procedures	30

Part II. Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings	30

Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds	30

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities	30

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	30

Item 5. Other Information	31

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K	31

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)

Pope Resources
June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003

(Thousands)

		2004		2003


Assets
Current assets:
	Cash and cash equivalents	$	8,865	$	10,361
	Accounts receivable		1,922		865
	Land held for sale		110		135
	Current portion of contracts receivable		16		872
	Prepaid expenses and other		72		545


	Total current assets		10,985		12,778


Properties and equipment at cost:
	Land and land improvements		22,527		20,800
	Roads and timber (net of accumulated depletion of $24,079 and $21,335)		53,801		48,203
	Buildings and equipment (net of accumulated depreciation of $5,768 and $5,537)		3,106		3,107


			79,434		72,110


Other assets:
	Contracts receivable, net of current portion		129		196
	Deferred tax asset and other		1,208		1,224


			1,337		1,420


		$	91,756	$	86,308


Liabilities and Partners’ Capital
Current liabilities:
	Accounts payable	$	615	$	536
	Accrued liabilities		894		1,325
	Environmental remediation		454		100
	Current portion of long-term debt		1,631		1,631
	Minority interest		30		89
	Other current liabilities		303		135


	Total current liabilities		3,927		3,816

Long-term debt, net of current portion			34,198		36,114
Other long term liabilities			184		342

Partners’ capital			53,447		46,036


		$	91,756	$	86,308

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)

Pope Resources
For the Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2003

(Thousands, except per unit data)		Three Months Ended June 30,							Six Months Ended June 30,
		2004			2003				2004			2003


Revenues		$	11,888			$	7,480		$	23,620			$	14,792
Cost of sales			(4,128	)			(3,128	)		(8,616	)			(5,999	)
Operating expenses			(1,974	)			(1,630	)		(3,732	)			(3,340	)
Environmental Remediation			(295	)			—			(295	)			—
General and administrative expenses			(718	)			(723	)		(1,456	)			(1,455	)

Income from operations			4,773				1,999			9,521				3,998


Other income (expense):
Interest expense			(801	)			(769	)		(1,575	)			(1,560	)
Interest income			25				75			49				152

			(776	)			(694	)		(1,526	)			(1,408	)

Income before income taxes			3,997				1,305			7,995				2,590

Income tax provision			—				(9	)		—				(3	)


Net income		$	3,997			$	1,296		$	7,995			$	2,587


Allocable to general partners		$	53			$	17		$	106			$	34
Allocable to limited partners			3,944				1,279			7,889				2,553


		$	3,997			$	1,296		$	7,995			$	2,587


Earnings per unit:
	Basic	$	0.88			$	0.29		$	1.77			$	0.57

	Diluted	$	0.87			$	0.29		$	1.75			$	0.57


Weighted average units outstanding:
	Basic		4,520				4,518			4,520				4,518

	Diluted		4,594				4,519			4,579				4,519

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

Pope Resources
Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2003

(Thousands)			2004			2003

Cash flows provided by operating activities
Net income			$	7,995		$	2,587
Add back non-cash charges:
	Deferred profit			75			29
	Depletion			2,765			1,654
	Depreciation and amortization			342			329
	Cost of land sold			5			—
Change in working capital accounts:
	Accounts receivable			(1,057	)		39
	Contracts receivable			924			791
	Land held for sale			25			175
	Other current assets			473			29
	Accounts payable			79			(281	)
	Accrued liabilities			(431	)		(741	)
	Deposits			93			15
	Environmental remediation			196			(236	)
	Restructuring			—			(459	)
	Other			13			(24	)

Net cash flows provided by operating activities				11,497			3,907

Cash flows from investing activities:
	Timberland acquisition			(8,518	)		—
	Capital expenditures			(1,916	)		(716	)
	Proceeds from sale of building			—			10


		Net cash used in investing activities		(10,434	)		(706	)


Cash flows from financing activities:
	Option exercise			49			—
	Minority interest distribution			(59	)		(161	)
	Repayment of long-term debt			(1,916	)		(1,613	)
	Unitholder distribution			(633	)		(452	)


		Net cash used in financing activities		(2,559	)		(2,226	)


Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents				(1,496	)		975
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year				10,361			6,627


Cash and cash equivalents at end of the six-month period			$	8,865		$	7,602

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

POPE RESOURCES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
June 30, 2004

1.	The condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 and for the three-months (quarter), and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 have been prepared by Pope Resources, A Delaware Limited Partnership (“the Partnership”) pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The financial information for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 is unaudited, but, in the opinion of management, reflects all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments and accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods. The financial information as of December 31, 2003, is derived from the Partnership’s audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2003, and should be read in conjunction with such financial statements. The results of operations for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be achieved for the entire fiscal year ending December 31, 2004.

2.	The financial statements in the Partnership’s 2003 annual report on Form 10-K include a summary of significant accounting policies of the Partnership and should be read in conjunction with this Form 10-Q.

3.	Basic net earnings per unit are based on the weighted average number of units outstanding during the period. Diluted net earnings per unit are based on the weighted average number of units and dilutive unit options outstanding at the end of the period.

		Quarter Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
		2004		2003		2004		2003

Weighted average units outstanding (in thousands):
	Basic		4,520		4,518		4,520		4,518
	Dilutive effect of unit options		74		1		59		1

	Diluted		4,594		4,519		4,579		4,519

Options to purchase 392,000 units at prices ranging from $9.30 to $27.88 per unit were outstanding as of June 30, 2004. For the computation of dilutive effect of unit options for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, options to purchase 165,000 units at prices ranging from $19.00 to $27.88 were not included in the calculation because the option exercise prices were greater than the average market prices of units during the period. For the computation of dilutive effect of unit options for the six-month period ended June 30, 2004, options to purchase 191,000 units at prices ranging from $17.51 to $27.88 were not included in the calculation because the option exercise prices were greater than the average market price during the period.

	Options to purchase 349,000 units at prices ranging from $9.30 to $27.88 were outstanding as of June 30, 2003. For the computation of dilutive effect of unit options for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, options to purchase 348,000 units at prices ranging from $11.00 to $27.88 per unit were not included in the calculation because the option exercise prices were greater than the weighted average market price for the period. For the computation of dilutive effect of unit options for the six-month period ended June 30, 2003, options to purchase 348,000 units at prices ranging from $10.40 to $27.88 were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per unit because the option exercise prices were greater than the average market price during the period.

4.	The Partnership accounts for unit-based compensation in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Accordingly, compensation cost for unit options is measured as the excess, if any, of the fair value of the Partnership’s units at the date of grant over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the unit.

	Unit options granted have an exercise price not less than the fair value of the Partnership’s unit price on the date of the grant. Had compensation expense for unit option grants been recognized based on the fair value at the grant date consistent with the Black-Scholes method described in SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, the Partnership’s net income would have been adjusted to the pro forma amounts indicated below:

		Quarter ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
(In thousands except per unit amounts)		2004			2003			2004			2003


Net income as reported		$	3,997		$	1,296		$	7,995		$	2,587

Compensation expense recognized			—			—			—			—

Subtract proforma compensation expense under SFAS 123			(50	)		(72	)		(100	)		(135	)


Proforma net income under SFAS 123		$	3,947		$	1,224		$	7,895		$	2,452


As reported:
	Basic	$	0.88		$	0.29		$	1.77		$	0.57

	Diluted	$	0.87		$	0.29		$	1.75		$	0.57


Proforma net income per unit:
	Basic	$	0.87		$	0.27		$	1.75		$	0.54

	Diluted	$	0.86		$	0.27		$	1.72		$	0.54

The fair value of options was calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, with the following assumptions:

	2004	2003

Expected life	5 years	5 years
Risk free interest rate	3.97%	3.70%
Dividend yield	2%	2%
Volatility	57%	44%

5.	Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: Interest paid amounted to approximately $804,000 and $776,000 for the quarters ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, interest paid amounted to $1,569,000 and $1,583,000, respectively.

6.	Revenue and operating income by segment for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, are as follows:

Three Months Ended June 30 (Thousands)	Fee Timber			Timberland Management & Consulting				Real Estate				Other			Consolidated

2004
Revenue	$	9,386			$	496			$	2,132		$	—			$	12,014
Eliminations		(17	)			(100	)			(9	)		—				(126	)

Revenue		9,369				396				2,123			—				11,888

Cost of sales		(4,066	)			—				(62	)		—				(4,128	)

Operating expenses		(1,029	)			(520	)			(846	)		(718	)			(3,113	)
Eliminations		98				25				3			—				126

Operating expenses		(931	)			(495	)			(843	)		(718	)			(2,987	)

Income (loss) from operations		4,291				(24	)			1,224			(718	)			4,773
Eliminations		81				(75	)			(6	)		—				—

Income (loss) from operations	$	4,372			$	(99	)		$	1,218		$	(718	)		$	4,773


2003
Revenue	$	6,366			$	395			$	852		$	—			$	7,613
Eliminations		(28	)			(96	)			(9	)		—				(133	)

Revenue		6,338				299				843			—				7,480

Cost of sales		(2,911	)			—				(217	)		—				(3,128	)

Operating expenses		(853	)			(509	)			(399	)		(725	)			(2,486	)
Eliminations		112				16				3			2				133

Operating expenses		(741	)			(493	)			(396	)		(723	)			(2,353	)

Income (loss) from operations		2,602				(114	)			236			(725	)			1,999
Eliminations		84				(80	)			(6	)		2				—

Income (loss) from operations	$	2,686			$	(194	)		$	230		$	(723	)		$	1,999

Six Months Ended June 30 (Thousands)	Fee Timber			Timberland Management & Consulting				Real Estate				Other			Consolidated

2004
Revenue	$	20,810			$	731			$	2,336		$	—			$	23,877
Eliminations		(30	)			(209	)			(18	)		—				(257	)

Revenue		20,780				522				2,318			—				23,620

Cost of sales		(8,548	)			—				(68	)		—				(8,616	)

Operating expenses		(1,919	)			(1,088	)			(1,277	)		(1,456	)			(5,740	)
Eliminations		190				63				4							257

Operating expenses		(1,729	)			(1,025	)			(1,273	)		(1.456	)			(5,483	)

Income (loss) from operations		10,343				(357	)			991			(1,456	)			9,521
Eliminations		160				(146	)			(14	)		—				—

Income (loss) from operations	$	10,503			$	(503	)		$	977		$	(1,456	)		$	9,521


2003
Revenue	$	13,154			$	931			$	1,014		$	—			$	15,099
Eliminations		(41	)			(248	)			(18	)		—				(307	)

Revenue		13,113				683				996			—				14,792

Cost of sales		(5,776	)			—				(223	)		—				(5,999	)

Operating expenses		(1,750	)			(1,048	)			(844	)		(1,460	)			(5,102	)
Eliminations		255				42				5			5				307

Operating expenses		(1,495	)			(1,006	)			(839	)		(1,455	)			(4,795	)

Income (loss) from operations		5,628				(117	)			(53	)		(1,460	)			3,998
Eliminations		214				(206	)			(13	)		5				—

Income (loss) from operations	$	5,842			$	(323	)		$	(66	)	$	(1,455	)		$	3,998

There was one significant change to segment assets in the first two quarters of 2004 with the acquisition of 3,300 acres of timberland. This acquisition resulted in an $8.5 million shift of cash from Other to timber in the Fee Timber segment.

ITEM 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This report contains a number of projections and statements about our expected financial condition, operating results, and business plans and objectives. These statements reflect our management’s estimates based on our current goals, in light of management’s expectations about future developments. Statements about expectations and future performance are “forward looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Because these statements describe our goals, objectives and anticipated performance, they are inherently uncertain, and some or all of these statements may not come to pass. Accordingly, you should not interpret these statements as promises that we will perform at a given level or that we will take any or all of the actions we currently expect to take. Our future actions, as well as our actual performance, will vary from our current expectations, and under various circumstances these variations may be material and adverse. Some of the factors that may cause our actual operating results and financial condition to fall short of our expectations are set forth in the part of this report entitled “Risks and Uncertainties” below and other factors discussed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003. Other issues that may have an adverse and material impact on our business, operating results and financial condition include environmental and land use regulations that limit our ability to harvest timber and develop property and economic conditions that affect consumer demand for our products and the prices we receive for them, and those other risks and uncertainties discussed in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The forward looking statements in this report are accurate as of the date of the report, and we cannot undertake to update these statements as our business operations and environment change.

This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Partnership’s condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included with this report.

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

Pope Resources, A Delaware Limited Partnership (“we” or the “Partnership”), was organized in October 1985 as a result of a spin-off by Pope & Talbot, Inc. (“P&T”). Pope Resources is engaged in three primary businesses. The first, and by far most significant, segment in terms of owned assets and operations is the Fee Timber segment. Operations in this segment consist of growing timber to be harvested as logs for sale to export and domestic manufacturers. The second most significant business in terms of total assets owned is the development and sale of real estate. Real Estate activities primarily take the form of securing permits and entitlements for unimproved land and then realizing that land’s value by selling large parcels to buyers who will take the land further up the value chain, either to home buyers or commercial property operators or lessors. Since these land projects span multiple years, the Real Estate segment may incur losses for multiple years until a major project is sold, which then results in operating income. Our third business is providing timberland-related services to third parties. These services may take the form of large-scale timberland management, forestry consulting, or acquisition and disposition services.

Management’s major opportunity and challenge is to profitably grow our revenue base. We have added almost 44,000 acres over the last three years to our owned timberland portfolio with the most recent addition of 3,300 acres coming in January 2004. Our real estate challenges center around how and when to “harvest” a parcel of land and capture the optimum value increment through sale. Regarding our third-party timberland services, we are currently without a major client contract for the first time since 1997 and are diligently seeking to secure revenue-producing opportunities for this segment.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table reconciles and compares key revenue and cost elements that determined net income realized for each of the three-month periods ended June 30, 2004 to June 30, 2003, respectively. In addition to the table’s detailed numeric analysis, the explanatory text that follows the table describes many of these changes by business segment.

QUARTER TO QUARTER COMPARISONS
(Amounts in $000’s except per unit data)

			Q2 2004 vs. Q2 2003

			Total			Per Unit


Net income:
	2nd Quarter 2004		$	3,997		$	0.88
	2nd Quarter 2003			1,296			0.29

		Variance		2,701			0.59

Detail of earnings variance:
Fee Timber
	Log price realizations (A)			614			0.14
	Log volumes (B)			1,674			0.37
	Depletion			(483	)		(0.11	)
	Other Fee Timber			(119	)		(0.03	)
Timberland Management & Consulting
	Management/consulting fees			223			0.05
	Other Timberland Mgmnt & Consulting			(128	)		(0.03	)
Real Estate
	Environmental remediation reserve			(295	)		(0.07	)
	Operating results from sold RE op’s			41			0.01
	Land sales			1,257			0.28
	Other Real Estate			(15	)		—
General & administrative costs				5			—
Interest expense				(32	)		(0.01	)
Other (taxes, minority int., interest inc.)				(41	)		(0.01	)

Total change in earnings			$	2,701		$	0.59

	(A)	Price variance calculated by extending the change in average realized price current period volume

	(B)	Volume variance calculated by extending change in sales volume by the average log sale price for the comparison period, less variance in log production costs.

Fee Timber

Fee Timber revenue is earned primarily from the harvest and sale of logs from the Partnership’s 115,000 acres of fee timberland located in western Washington and, to a lesser extent, from the sale of gravel and leases of cellular communication tower sites on our properties. Revenue from the sale of timberland tracts will also appear periodically in results for this segment. Our Fee Timber revenue is driven primarily by the volume of timber harvested, which we ordinarily express in terms of millions of board feet, or “MMBF”, and by the average prices realized on log sales, which we express in dollars per thousand board feet, or “MBF”.

When discussing our Fee Timber operations current results are compared to both the last completed quarter and the comparable quarter from the prior year. Both of these comparisons are made to help the reader gain an understanding of the trends in market price and harvest volumes that affect Fee Timber results of operations. When discussing other segment results we discuss current quarter performance only in comparison to the prior year’s comparable quarter and not in relation to the immediately preceding quarter. This expanded trend analysis for Fee Timber reflects the significance to overall results of Fee Timber and the impact of market price and harvest volume trends on Fee Timber and overall Partnership income. Revenue and operating income for the Fee Timber segment for the quarters ended June 30, 2004, March 31, 2004 and June 30, 2003 are as follows:

Quarter Ended:

Log Sales

Mineral, Cell
Tower & Other

Total Fee
Timber Revenue

Operating Income

June 30, 2004

9.1 million

0.3 million

9.4 million

4.4 million

March 31, 2004

11.0 million

0.4 million

11.4 million

6.1 million

June 30, 2003

6.1 million

0.2 million

6.3 million

2.7 million

Fluctuations in total Fee Timber revenue and operating income between Quarter 2 2004 and Quarter 1 2004 and Quarter 2 2004 and Quarter 2 2003 are as follows:

Quarterly changes	Total Fee Timber Revenue			Operating Income

Q-2 2004 and Q-1 2004		$	(2.0) million		$	(1.7) million
Q-2 2004 and Q-2 2003			3.1 million			1.7 million

The decrease in revenue and operating income for the current quarter from the quarter ended March 31, 2004 is due to a 2.8 MMBF decrease in harvest volume for the quarter combined with a $23 per MBF decline in average price realized per MBF of harvest. The decline in harvest volume resulted from our decision to front-load harvest into the first quarter of 2004 to take advantage of strong log markets (both export and domestic). The decline in average log price realized per MBF is due to a decrease in volume sold to the export market. Both revenue and operating income for Fee Timber in the second quarter of 2004 increased relative to the comparable period in 2003. This increase in revenue and operating income is due to harvest volumes that were 4.9 MMBF higher than last year’s comparable quarter combined with an improvement in average price realized of $35 per MBF. The increase in harvest volume is attributable to two factors. First, the January 2004 acquisition of 3,300 acres from Plum Creek Timber Company enabled us to increase our annual harvest. This acquisition contained a large component of merchantable timber that is expected to result in an increase to our annual harvest in 2004 and 2005 to 58 MMBF per year from 45 MMBF in 2003. Cash flow resulting from this incremental harvest on the acquired lands will serve to offset a large portion of the purchase price. Second, strong log prices in early 2004 relative to those realized over the last few years resulted in management’s decision to accelerate the timing of the annual harvest to concentrate more harvest volume into the first half of the year.

The Partnership harvested the following timber from its fee timberlands for the quarters ended June 30, 2004, March 31, 2004, and June 30, 2003:

		30-June-04		Quarters ended 31-March-04		30-June-03

Log sale volumes (MBF):
	Export		1,558		5,624		1,203
	Domestic		12,529		11,690		8,939
	Pulp		2,786		2,633		2,069
	Hardwoods		682		405		464

	Total		17,555		20,352		12,675

Revenue and operating income for the Fee Timber segment for the six months ended June 30, 2004, and 2003 are as follows:

Six Months Ended:

Log Sales

Mineral,
Cell Tower
& Other

Total Fee
Timber
Revenue

Operating
Income

June 30, 2004

20.1 million

0.7 million

20.8 million

10.5 million

June 30, 2003

12.6 million

0.5 million

13.1 million

5.8 million

On a year-to-date basis revenue and operating income increased $7.7 million and $4.7 million, respectively, from June 30, 2003 to June 30, 2004. Both increases are due to the sale of log volume from the aforementioned timberland acquisition; an increase in average log prices; and the decision to front-load the annual harvest in 2004. The front-loaded harvest in 2004 was also present in 2003, however in 2004 the weighting of harvest volume to the first half of the year is even more pronounced with 65% of our planned annual harvest completed as of June 30, 2004 vs. 57% for the comparable period in 2003. The decision to front-load the annual harvest was based upon the relatively strong market for logs experienced in the first half of 2004. Weighted average log prices for the six months ended June 30, 2004 were 8% above the comparable period in 2003.

The Partnership realized the following average log prices from its fee timberlands for the quarters ended June 30, 2004, March 31, 2004, and June 30, 2003:

		Quarter Ended

Average price realizations (per MBF):		30-June-04			31-March-04			30-June-03

	Export		$	628		$	659		$	564
	Domestic			562			554			532
	Pulp			234			221			200
	Hardwoods			582			558			563
	Overall			517			540			482

The Partnership harvested the following timber and realized the following average log prices from its fee timberlands for the six-month period ended June 30, 2004 and 2003:

		30-June-04		30-June-03

Log sale volumes (MBF):
	Export		7,182		2,633
	Domestic		24,219		18,226
	Pulp		5,419		3,748
	Hardwoods		1,087		1,234

	Total		37,907		25,841

Average price realizations (per MBF):		30-June-04			30-June-03

	Export		$	652		$	579
	Domestic			558			528
	Pulp			228			216
	Hardwoods			573			543
	Overall			529			489

We sell our logs to domestic mills and to log brokers that resell our logs to Japanese customers and, when export conditions allow, to the Korean and Chinese log markets. Prices paid by these log brokers are dependent upon the export market for logs but are generally purchased for a premium when compared to prices paid by domestic customers. In the current quarter, realized export prices increased 11% from the comparable quarter in 2003, but decreased 5% from the first quarter of 2004. The decrease in export prices realized from the first quarter of 2004 reflects a lower quality export log mix and a slight decline in export market conditions relative to the first quarter of 2004. Even with this decline, year-to-date export prices are still considerably stronger than those realized over the last few years. The cyclical improvement in the export market is a welcome change from the last few years, but should be taken in context with the structural changes that management still believes have changed the long-term log export market. Logs from the Pacific Northwest region of the United States continue to face competition in Asia from lower valued log species supplied by other countries. Additionally, greater use of alternative building materials and engineered wood products have diminished the price premium we have historically been able to obtain for Douglas-fir logs sold to the export market. Offsetting these downward pressures on log prices, the weakened state of the U.S. dollar vis-a-vis the Japanese yen has helped to boost the competitiveness of our logs in certain markets this year. A modest economic recovery in Japan has also contributing to stronger export log pricing this year.

The proportion of second quarter 2004 overall log volume sold to the export market has decreased to 9% from 28% for the first quarter 2004. This dramatic drop in export percentage is more a function of harvest unit selection in the first quarter of 2004 being specifically aimed to capitalize on strong export pricing. Certain harvest units are projected before cutting to have a higher-than-normal component of export-quality wood. We moved these units to the front of our annual harvest queue to best “time the market.” The proportion of total timber volume sold to the export market in the second quarter of 2004 has not changed significantly from the comparable quarter in the prior year.

Domestic log prices for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 were 1% and 6% higher than the first quarter of 2004 and second quarter of 2003, respectively. This improvement in domestic log prices is attributed to a strong housing market in the U.S. combined with a significant decline in logs imported from Canada. The decline in Canadian log volume is due to several factors. First, the unusually hot dry summer of 2003 in British Columbia resulted in a decline in timber harvest. This was followed in late 2003 by a labor strike in British Columbia. These two conditions led to reduced log inventories in western Canada. Finally, hot and dry conditions in western Canada have continued into 2004, resulting in Canadian mills consuming a higher proportion of the timber being harvested in Canada. These same weather conditions that have restricted logging in western Canada have been present to a degree in the U.S. Pacific Northwest. The Hood Canal tree farm is in a marine-influenced climate, which allows us to continue to harvest when a lot of tree farms that are further inland are faced with harvest restrictions. All of this has resulted in a relatively strong domestic market for logs in the quarter ended June 30, 2004 despite the weakening export market.

Pulp log volumes were 2.8 MMBF, 2.6 MMBF, and 2.1 MMBF for the quarters ended June 30, 2004, March 31, 2004, and June 30, 2003, respectively. The average price realized per MBF on pulp logs was $234, $221, and $200, for the quarters ended June 30, 2004, March 31, 2004 and June 30, 2003, respectively. Pulp log prices have increased 6% from the first quarter of 2004 and have increased 17% from the second quarter of 2003. Pulp log prices improved primarily as a result of stronger pricing for finished pulp and paper products.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales for the Fee Timber segment consists of two components: harvest costs and depletion expense. Harvest costs represent the direct costs incurred to manufacture trees into logs and deliver those logs to their point of sale. Depletion expense represents the cost of acquiring or growing the timber harvested and is calculated using a depletion rate developed from an accumulation of the cost of the timber, divided by the estimated volume of merchantable timber available for harvest. The depletion rate is then applied to the volume harvested to calculate depletion expense. Fee Timber cost of sales for the quarters ended June 30, 2004, March 31, 2004, and June 30, 2003, respectively were:

Quarter Ended:

Harvest and
Haul Costs

Depletion Expense

Total

June 30, 2004

2.8 million

1.3 million

4.1 million

March 31, 2004

3.0 million

1.5 million

4.5 million

June 30, 2003

2.2 million

0.7 million

2.9 million

Quarter Ended:	Harvest and Haul Costs per MBF			Depletion Expense per MBF			Total

June 30, 2004		$	160		$	72	$	232
March 31, 2004			148			72		220
June 30, 2003			168			62		230

Harvest and haul costs, depletion expense, and total cost of sales have decreased in the second quarter of 2004 relative to the first quarter of 2004 and increased relative to the comparable period in 2003. Both of these changes are explained by change in harvest volume. Harvest costs vary based upon the physical site characteristics of acres harvested during the year. For example, sites that are not readily accessible, or are located on a steep hillside, are more expensive to harvest. Furthermore, haul costs vary based upon the distance between the harvest area and the mill customer’s location. For the quarter ended June 30, 2004, harvest costs per MBF have increased relative to the first quarter of 2004 due to a lower proportion of total harvest from the Hood Canal tree farm. The Hood Canal tree farm is generally at lower elevations with gentler terrain than the Columbia tree farm, which results in a lower average cost of harvest.

The rate applied to harvest volume to calculate depletion expense is calculated annually in January and does not normally change during the year. Depletion expense per MBF has increased in 2004 relative to 2003 due to the January 2004 timberland acquisition.

Fee Timber cost of sales for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 were:

Six Months Ended:	Harvest and Haul Costs		Depletion		Total

June 30, 2004	$	5.8 million	$	2.7 million	$	8.5 million
June 30, 2003		4.2 million		1.6 million	$	5.8 million

Six Months Ended:	Harvest and Haul Costs per MBF			Depletion Expense per MBF			Total

June 30, 2004		$	153		$	72		$	225
June 30, 2003			162			62			224

Cost of sales has increased $2.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 from the comparable period in 2003. This increase in cost of sales is attributable to the 47% increase in harvest volume. Depletion expense per MBF has increased $10 per MBF due to the January 2004 timberland acquisition. The decrease in harvest and haul costs per MBF is due to the types of stands that have been harvested in 2004. When compared to the same period in 2003, the stands we have been harvesting in 2004 have been in locations that are less costly to operate. The harvest and haul cost per MBF amount is expected to increase in the third quarter as the Partnership begins harvesting from less accessible locations.

Operating Expenses

Fee Timber operating expenses for the quarters ended June 30, 2004, March 31, 2004 and June 30, 2003 were $931,000, $798,000, and $741,000, respectively. Operating expenses on a quarterly basis vary depending primarily on the timing of road maintenance and silviculture projects. Fee Timber operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 were $1.7 million and $1.5 million, respectively.

The increase in operating expenses in the second quarter of 2004 relative to both the first quarter 2004 and second quarter 2003 is due to the intra-year timing of road maintenance projects. The increase in year-to-date operating expenses compared to last year is due primarily to an increase in the cost of road maintenance following Washington State’s new road maintenance and abandonment rules. The new road maintenance and abandonment rules are expected to result in an increase in road maintenance costs for the next two to three years.

Timberland Management & Consulting

Revenue and operating loss for the Timberland Management & Consulting segment for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 were as follows:

Quarter Ended:	Revenue		Operating Loss

June 30, 2004	$	0.4 million	$	0.1 million
June 30, 2003		0.3 million		0.2 million

Six Months Ended:	Revenue		Operating Loss

June 30, 2004	$	0.5 million	$	0.5 million
June 30, 2003		0.7 million		0.3 million

Revenue for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 was $97,000 higher than the comparable period in 2003. Operating loss for the current quarter was $95,000 lower than the comparable period in 2003. The increase in revenue and operating results is due to revenue earned from timberland consulting services provided to a new client. On a year-to-date basis revenue has decreased $161,000 and operating loss increased $180,000. We are still operating without a major timberland management client following completion of a timberland management and disposition project in the fourth quarter of 2003. Management is currently working on the launch of a private equity timber fund as well as pursuing other large-scale timberland management opportunities to replace this lost revenue.

Operating Expenses

Timberland Management & Consulting operating expenses for the quarters ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 were $495,000 and $493,000, respectively. On a year-to-date basis, operating expenses are consistent at $1.0 million for both six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003. Operating expenses in the first quarter of 2004 include $70,000 of bad debt expense due to the write-down of a receivable from a former customer of our closed timberland consulting operation in British Columbia. The receivable is from a large forest products company in British Columbia that is currently working its way through bankruptcy. We have $20,000 of the receivable remaining on our balance sheet following the write-down, which represents our current estimate of the realizable value from this receivable.

Real Estate

The Partnership’s Real Estate segment consists primarily of residential and commercial property rents and of revenue from the sale of land to developers or investors. The Partnership’s real estate holdings are located in Pierce, Kitsap, and Jefferson Counties in Washington State.

Revenue and operating income (loss) for the Real Estate segment for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 are as follows:

Quarter Ended:	Revenue			Operating income

June 30, 2004		$	2.1 million		$	1.2 million
June 30, 2003			0.8 million			0.2 million

Six Months Ended:	Revenue			Operating Income/(Loss)

June 30, 2004		$	2.3 million		$	1.0 million
June 30, 2003			1.0 million			(0.1) million

Current quarter revenue includes $1.9 million from a 426-acre sale to Kitsap County for a regional park in Kingston, Washington as well as rent earned on residential and commercial leases at Port Gamble. Operating expenses include costs incurred while management pursues zoning and development entitlements to maximize value from the Partnership’s 2,600-acre portfolio of land investments. The current status of these pursuits is described below.

At our development property in Gig Harbor, Washington we are working on plans and permits for a water tank and road improvements to the commercial portion of the property. Our first closing on this property is expected in 2005 to Costco Wholesale Corporation for approximately 17 acres of the 320-acre site. We have also signed a purchase and sale agreement with Northwest Capital Investors for 1.7 acres with a purchase price of $1.8 million. Northwest Capital Investors plans to use the property as a location for a Walgreen’s store.

Management has also signed a purchase and sale agreement with a developer to sell 205 acres of the 248-acre Hansville property for $1.5 million. This portion of the Hansville property, also identified by its plat name of “Homestead,” has preliminary plat approval for 89 residential lots. A closing on this property is targeted for late in the fourth quarter of 2004.

Separately, we are working on the preliminary approvals for several large-lot residential subdivisions that we expect to begin marketing later in 2004. These large-lot subdivisions reflect an emergent strategy for conversion of marginal timberland into near-term cash where the realizable per acre real estate values are sufficiently in excess of timberland values.

Cost of Sales

Real Estate cost of sales for each of the quarters ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 were $62,000 and $217,000, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 cost of sales were $68,000 and $223,000, respectively. Cost of sales during the current quarter represents cost basis on the 426-acre sale to Kitsap County. The property sold in this transaction was raw acreage. Cost of sales in the comparable period in 2003 represented basis on a plat sale in Everett, Washington. The basis in the sale completed in 2003 was higher due to the cost of platting the property.

Operating Expenses

Real Estate operating expenses for the quarters ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 were $843,000 and $396,000, respectively. For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, operating expenses were $1.3 million and $839,000, respectively. Operating expenses in the current quarter include a $295,000 expense for environmental remediation at the Port Gamble townsite discussed in more detail below. The remaining increase in Real Estate operating expenses is due to repair and maintenance costs incurred on the residential and commercial properties at the Port Gamble townsite.

Environmental Remediation

The additional environmental remediation charge in the current quarter results from our discussions with consultants we have hired to assist us with the clean up process. Those experts informed management that ongoing testing at the Port Gamble site reveals a higher than anticipated contamination, and estimated that additional costs between $488,000 and $729,000 may be necessary to comply with the Partnership’s obligations respecting that liability. The consultants also informed management that no single estimate within that range has a higher likelihood of representing actual results than another. Therefore, we have recorded a charge to bring the liability to the low point of the range provided, consistent with current accounting standards. The environmental liability at June 30, 2004 includes $454,000 that the Partnership expects to expend in the next 12 months and $34,000 thereafter.

Port Gamble is a historic town that was owned by Pope & Talbot (P&T) until 1985 when the townsite and other assets were spun off into the Partnership. The townsite included a lumber mill that operated until 1995 and was dismantled by the end of 1996. P&T continued to lease the millsite until January 2002, when a settlement agreement was signed between the Partnership and P&T that divided the responsibility for paying for environmental remediation costs in Port Gamble.

Activity in the environmental remediation liability is detailed as follows:

	Balances at the Beginning of the Period			Additions to Accrual		Expenditures for Remediation		Balances at the End of the Period

Year Ended December 31, 2000		$	120,000	$	1,956,000	$	206,000		$	1,870,000
Year Ended December 31, 2001			1,870,000		—		461,000			1,409,000
Year Ended December 31, 2002			1,409,000		730,000		1,510,000			629,000
Year Ended December 31, 2003			629,000		—		337,000			292,000
Quarter ended March 31, 2004			292,000		—		9,000			283,000
Quarter ended June 30, 2004			283,000		295,000		90,000			488,000

General and Administrative (G&A)

General and administrative expenses for the quarters ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 were $718,000 and $723,000, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, general and administrative expenses were $1.5 million in both periods. The Partnership is projecting G&A expenses for 2004 to approximate $3.0 million.

Interest Income and Expense

Interest income for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 declined to $25,000 from $75,000 at June 30, 2003. For the six-month period interest income declined to $49,000 as of June 30, 2004 from $152,000 at June 30, 2003. The decline in interest income is due to the reduction in the balance of the note receivable from the purchaser of Port Ludlow. This note was paid off in March 2004.

Interest expense for the three-month period ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 was $801,000 and $769,000, respectively. For the six month period interest expense totaled $1.6 million as of June 30, 2004 and 2003. The Partnership’s debt consists primarily of mortgage debt with a fixed interest rate. The increase in interest expense in the second quarter of 2004 is due to a “make-whole” payment due the mortgage lender as the result of an unscheduled $374,000 prepayment on the Partnership’s timberland mortgage attributable to the land sale to Kitsap County.

Income Tax

Pope Resources is a limited partnership and is therefore not subject to corporate income tax. Taxable income/loss is reported to unitholders each year on a Form K-1 for inclusion in each unitholder’s tax return. Pope Resources does have subsidiaries that are corporations and are subject to income tax.

For the three months ended June 30, 2004, the Partnership’s taxable subsidiaries experienced a net loss. We recorded a valuation allowance for the tax asset created from the losses incurred in our taxable subsidiaries. As a result there is no income tax provision in the current quarter as compared to a $9,000 tax provision for the comparable period in the prior year. On a year-to-date basis, the Partnership recorded a valuation allowance for the tax asset created as a result of operating losses generated in its taxable subsidiaries versus a tax provision of $3,000 for the comparable period in 2003. The valuation allowance recorded in 2004 was based upon current projections of net income in these subsidiaries.

Supplemental Segment Information

The following table provides comparative operating information for the Partnership’s segments:

			SEGMENT INFORMATION (all amounts in $000’s)

			Three months ended June 30,							Six months ended June 30,
			2004			2003				2004			2003

Revenues:
	Fee Timber		$	9,369			$	6,338		$	20,780			$	13,113
	Timberland Management & Consulting (TM&C)			396				299			522				683
	Real Estate			2,123				843			2,318				996

		Total		11,888				7,480			23,620				14,792
EBITDDA:
	Fee Timber			5,671				3,531			13,304				7,561
	TM&C			(77	)			(180	)		(459	)			(289	)
	Real Estate			1,279				250			1,061				(27	)
	General & administrative			(632	)			(629	)		(1,278	)			(1,264	)

		Total		6,241				2,972			12,628				5,981
Depreciation, depletion and amortization:
	Fee Timber			1,299				845			2,801				1,719
	TM&C			22				14			44				34
	Real Estate			61				20			84				39
	General & administrative			86				94			178				191

		Total		1,468				973			3,107				1,983
Operating income/(loss):
	Fee Timber			4,372				2,686			10,503				5,842
	TM&C			(99	)			(194	)		(503	)			(323	)
	Real Estate			1,218				230			977				(66	)
	General & administrative			(718	)			(723	)		(1,456	)			(1,455	)

		Total	$	4,773			$	1,999		$	9,521			$	3,998

EBITDDA= Earnings before interest, income tax, depletion, depreciation, and amortization. The Company considers earnings (net income or loss) before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization (EBITDDA) to be a relevant and meaningful indicator of liquidity and earnings performance commonly used by investors, financial analysts and others in evaluating companies in its industry and, as such, has provided this information in addition to the generally accepted accounting principle-based presentation of net income or loss.

Analysis of Operating Income

The following table sets forth expenses as a percentage of revenues for the quarters and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003:

	Quarter ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,

	2004			2003			2004			2003

Revenues		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%
Cost of sales		35			42			37			41
Operating expenses		19			21			17			22
General, and administrative expenses		6			10			6			10

Operating income		40	%		27	%		40	%		27	%

Cost of sales includes the cost of purchasing and producing tangible goods for sale. Cost of sales for the Partnership will fluctuate due to the mix of revenue between the sale of tangible goods and revenue generated from providing services. Cost of sales as a percentage of revenues has decreased on both a quarter-to-date and year-to-date basis from the comparable period in the prior year. The decrease in cost of sales as a percentage of revenues results from a land sale recorded in the Real Estate segment during the current quarter. This land sale consisted of $1.9 million of revenue and $55k of basis resulting in a decline in cost of sales as a percentage of revenue. The land sold was timberland with a relatively low basis resulting in a very high gross margin on the sale. In addition, the gross margin realized by the Fee Timber segment has increased 3% to 57% in the current quarter versus 54% for the comparable period in 2003. The improvement in gross margin is a function of the increase in weighted average price realized on log sales. The combination of these two factors has caused a decrease in the ratio of cost of sales to revenue.

Operating expenses consist of salary and other costs directly attributable to revenue-generating activity. As a percentage of revenues, operating expenses have decreased 2% to 19% for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 from 21% for the comparable period in 2003. On a year-to-date basis, operating expenses as a percentage of revenue decreased 5% to 17% from 22%. The decrease in operating expenses as a percentage of revenues is due to the aforementioned land sale, which contributed $1.9 million of revenue with no change in operating expenses. This positive impact on the expense ratio was partially offset by the $295,000 environmental remediation expense recorded in the current quarter for clean up activities in and around the Port Gamble townsite.

G&A expenses as a percentage of revenues on both a quarter-to-date and year-to-date are 6% for the current periods ended June 30, 2004 as compared to 10% for the comparable periods in 2003. General and administrative expenses on a raw dollar basis remained consistent between the two periods while revenue increased 60%.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We ordinarily finance our operations using funds from operations and, where appropriate in management’s assessment, lender lines of credit. Funds generated from operations and externally through financing are expected to provide the required resources for the Partnership’s capital expenditures. The Partnership’s debt-to-total capitalization ratio was 40% at June 30, 2004. This represents a decline from the quarters ended March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, in which we had debt-to-total capitalization ratios of 42% and 45%, respectively. Management considers its capital resources to be adequate for its current plans and does not anticipate any significant changes in its debt-to-total capitalization ratio over the balance of 2004. Based upon current plans the debt-to-total capitalization ratio is expected to continue its decline as we make our regularly scheduled mortgage payment in 2005. We do not currently have a line of credit since we believe our current cash position together with forecasted cash flows over the next few months are adequate to cover immediate and known financing needs.

We are currently working on locating investors for ORM Timber Fund I, LP. Pope Resources has agreed to invest 10% of the fund’s invested capital, which is expected to be around $50 million. We have agreed that once the fund is fully subscribed and suitable timber properties are identified and brought under contract for purchase by the fund, we will invest the 10% of fund’s aggregate equity capital that is expected to total approximately $5 million. ORMLLC, an indirect subsidiary of the Partnership, is expected to earn management and acquisition fees from the fund.

Management’s current plan is to harvest approximately 20 million board feet of timber over the remaining six months of 2004 for a total fiscal 2004 harvest of 58 million board feet. Since harvest plans are based on demand and pricing, actual harvesting may vary subject to management’s ongoing review.

In the six months ended June 30, 2004, cash generated by operating activities was $11.5 million and overall cash and cash equivalents decreased $1.5 million from December 31, 2003. Cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2004 was $10.4 million and consisted of $8.5 million for a timberland acquisition, $1.0 million in capitalized costs for the Gig Harbor project, $398,000 of reforestation expenditures, $279,000 of capital improvements to buildings and a small land purchase at the Port Gamble townsite, and $258,000 in other capital improvements. Cash used in financing activities included mortgage principal payments of $1.9 million, two unitholder distributions totaling $633,000 and a minority interest payment of $60,000.

In the six months ended June 30, 2003, cash generated by operating activities was $3.9 million and overall cash and cash equivalents increased $975,000 from December 31, 2002. Cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2003 was $706,000 and consisted of reforestation expenditures, capital improvements to buildings at the Port Gamble townsite, and capitalized expenditures for the Gig Harbor property. Cash used in financing activities included a mortgage principal payment of $1.6 million, two unitholder distributions totaling $452,000 and a minority interest payment of $161,000.

Seasonality

Fee Timber. The Partnership owns 115,000 acres of timberland in Washington State. Our timber acreage is concentrated in two non-contiguous tree farms: the 71,000-acre Hood Canal tree farm located in Kitsap, Jefferson, Mason Counties on the eastern side of Washington’s Olympic Peninsula; and the 44,000-acre Columbia tree farm located in Cowlitz, Clark, Lewis, Skamania, and Pierce counties on the western side of Washington’s Cascade mountain range.

The Hood Canal tree farm is concentrated at low elevations, which permits us to harvest trees year-round. Generally, we concentrate our harvests from this tree farm in the winter and spring when supply, and thus competition, is typically lower and, accordingly, when we can expect to receive higher prices. With the acquisition of the Columbia tree farm in 2001 management expected a decrease in the seasonality of Fee Timber operations as the Columbia tree farm is at higher elevations where harvest activities are most feasible in the middle six months of the year. In practice, over the last few years our harvest has tended to be more front-loaded as log prices have been relatively strong in the first half of the year leading management to weight the harvest plans toward the first six months. In future quarters, management expects quarterly harvest volume to be affected by both local market conditions for logs and weather conditions.

Timberland Management & Consulting. Timberland Management & Consulting operations are not significantly seasonal.

Real Estate. While Real Estate results are not expected to be seasonal, the nature of the activities in this segment will likely result in large non-recurring transactions that may have large positive or negative impacts on revenue and operating income of the Partnership. .

Risks and Uncertainties

Our business is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, any one or more of which could impact our operating results and financial condition materially and adversely. Some of these risks are discussed in greater detail below, arranged according to business segment. In addition, we face a number of risks that affect our business generally. The Partnership competes against much larger companies in each of its business segments. These larger competitors may have access to larger amounts of capital and significantly greater economies of scale. Land ownership carries with it the risk of incurring liabilities due to accidents that take place on the land and previously undiscovered environmental contamination. The Partnership endeavors to maintain adequate accruals to reflect the cost of remediating known environmental contamination and other liabilities resulting from land ownership, however these estimates may prove to be inadequate as additional information is discovered. A more thorough discussion of the risks and uncertainties that may affect our business is contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, and in our various other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Readers should review these risks in deciding whether to invest in Partnership units, and should recognize that those factors are not an exhaustive list of risks that could cause us to deviate from our expectations. Readers also are cautioned that, in reviewing these risk factors, the factors contained in this report and in our other SEC filings are effective as of the date the filing was made, and we cannot undertake to update those disclosures.

Fee Timber

Fee Timber revenue is generated primarily through the sale of softwood logs to both domestic mills and third-party intermediaries that resell to the export market. The markets for these products are significantly affected by fluctuations in U.S. and Japanese economies, as well as by the foreign currency exchange rate between the Japanese yen and the U.S. dollar. Despite the strong prices experienced in the current quarter, over the last few years the Partnership has seen the price of logs erode in the Japanese market as competing logs and lumber from regions outside of the U.S. and engineered wood products have gradually gained market acceptance.

The domestic market for logs in the Puget Sound region has been impacted by imported lumber from Canada and decreased demand for lumber as engineered wood products have gained market acceptance in the U.S. In addition, we have experienced the gradual concentration of mill ownership with larger mill operators and decreasing the number of mills operating in the Puget Sound region. If this trend continues, decreases in local demand for logs may decrease our profitability.

Our ability to grow and harvest timber can be significantly impacted by legislation, regulations or court rulings that restrict or stop forest practices. Restrictions on logging, planting, road building, fertilizing, managing competing vegetation and other activities can significantly increase the cost or reduce available inventory thereby reducing income.

Timberland Management & Consulting

The Timberland Management & Consulting segment is currently operating without a major timberland management client for the first time since 1997[make this change because we had HTRG for all of 98]. Management is working to expand our customer base through market outreach efforts.

Representative of those efforts is our renewed focus on the Investor Portfolio Management Business (“IPMB”), which is a component of our Timberland Management & Consulting segment. However, unlike many other components of our business, which relate solely or primarily to real estate and timber operations, this line of business carries risks relating to the offer and sale of securities, and to the management of investment operations, including potential liability to investors if we are determined to have made material misstatements or omissions to those investors, potential accusations that we have breached fiduciary duties to other limited partners, and similar types of investor action. Moreover, litigation of shareholder-related matters can be expensive and time consuming, and if brought, would likely distract management from their focus on ordinary operating activities.

Real Estate

The value of our real estate investments is subject to changes in the economic and regulatory environment, as well as various land use regulations and development risks, including the ability to obtain the necessary permits and zoning variances that would allow us to maximize our revenue from our real estate investments. Our real estate investments are long-term in nature, which raises the risk that unforeseen changes in the economy or laws surrounding development activities may have an adverse affect on our investments. Moreover, these investments often are highly illiquid and thus may not generate cash flow if and when needed to support our other operations.

Capital Expenditures and Commitments

Total capital expenditures in 2004 (excluding the $8.5 million January 2004 timberland acquisition) are currently expected to be approximately $4.4 million, of which $1.9 million has been expended through June 30, 2004. The $4.4 million expected year-end amount of capital expenditures includes $1.8 million of expenditures related to the Real Estate project at Gig Harbor. The actual pace of these expected expenditures will depend on how quickly we are able get approval from the City of Gig Harbor on our planned infrastructure improvements at the site. The Partnership expects that the funds for these expenditures will be generated internally through operations and externally through financing.

Cost of Compliance with Government Regulation

Compliance with laws, regulations and demands usually involves capital expenditures as well as operating costs. The Partnership cannot easily quantify future amounts of capital expenditures required to comply with these laws, regulations and demands, or the effects on operating costs, because in some instances compliance standards have not been developed or have not become final or definitive. Accordingly, at this time the Partnership has not quantified any future capital requirements to comply with any new regulations being developed by the United States or Canadian regulatory agencies.

Litigation

The Partnership may from time to time be a defendant in lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business. As of June 30, 2004 and as of the date of this report, there was no litigation pending or, to management’s knowledge, threatened that, if determined adversely to the Partnership, would have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’s business, operating results or financial condition.

ACCOUNTING MATTERS

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Management believes its most critical accounting policies and estimates include those related to management’s calculation of timber depletion and liabilities related to matters such as environmental remediation, and potential asset impairments. In relation to liabilities, potential impairments and other estimated charges, it is management’s policy to conduct ongoing reviews of significant accounting policies and assumptions used in the preparation of the financial results of the Partnership. The assumptions used are tested against available and relevant information and reviewed with subject-matter experts for consistency and reliability. During the preparation of financial results, tests are conducted to ascertain that the net book carrying values of assets are not in excess of fair values. These tests use current market information, if available, or other generally accepted valuation methods, such as future cash flows. When the use of estimates is necessary, an exact answer is unlikely, and therefore, the reporting within a range of likely outcomes is used in the preparation of the financial statements. Tests are also applied in order to be reasonably assured that liabilities are properly reflected on the records of the Partnership and that the notes to the financial statements are prepared in a fashion that informs readers of possible outcomes and risks associated with the conduct of business.

Depletion: Depletion represents the cost of timber harvested and is charged to operations by applying a depletion rate to volume harvested during the period. The depletion rate is calculated on January 1st of each year by dividing the Partnership’s cost of merchantable timber by the volume of merchantable timber. Merchantable timber is defined as timber that is equal to or greater than 40 years of age. To calculate the depletion rate the Partnership has determined that a combined pool representing costs and volume of both the Hood Canal and Columbia tree farms is the most appropriate method to use.

Inventory volumes take into account the applicable state and federal regulatory limits on timber harvests as applied to the Partnership’s properties, including the new Forests and Fish law that supplements Washington State’s forest practice regulations to provide for expanded riparian management zones, wildlife leave trees, and other harvest restrictions. Timber inventory volume is accounted for by the Partnership’s standing timber inventory system, which utilizes annual statistical sampling of the timber (cruising) with annual adjustments made for estimated growth and the depletion of areas harvested.

The standing inventory system is subject to two processes each year to monitor accuracy. The first is the annual cruise process and the second is a comparison of (a) volume actually extracted by harvest to (b) inventory for the corresponding stands of harvested timber in the standing inventory system at the time of the harvest. A “cruise” represents a physical measurement of timber on a specific set of acres. The cruise process is completed when the physical measurement totals are compared to the inventory in the standing inventory system. Only productive acres with timber that is at least 20 years old are selected to cruise. The Partnership cruised 20% of its productive acres with 20 year old or greater timber in both 2002 and 2003 and plans to continue to cruise 20% for at least the next few years. Specific acres are first selected for cruising with a bias towards those acres that have gone the longest without a cruise and, second, with a bias towards those acres that have been growing the longest. As the cruise is being performed, only those trees with a breast height diameter (approximately 4.5 feet from the ground) of at least 6 inches are measured for inclusion in the inventory.

A 5% change in estimated timber inventory volume would have changed 2003 depletion expense by $152,000.

Environmental remediation: The environmental remediation liability represents estimated payments to be made to remedy and monitor certain areas in and around the townsite of Port Gamble. Port Gamble is a historic town that was owned and operated by P&T, a related party, until 1985 when the townsite and other assets were spun off to the Partnership. P&T continued to operate the townsite until 1996 and leased the mill site at Port Gamble through January 2002, at which point P&T signed an agreement with the Partnership dividing the responsibility for environmental remediation of Port Gamble between the two parties.

The environmental remediation liability on the Partnership’s books is based upon an estimate of the Partnership’s portion of the clean-up costs under this agreement with P&T. During the current quarter the environmental liability increased $295,000 as a result of costs to complete the Partnership’s share exceeding the prior estimate. While the majority of the Partnership’s portion of the clean up efforts is complete, there remains the possibility that the remaining remediation or monitoring activities may exceed estimates, resulting in an additional environmental remediation charge. Management will continue to monitor the remaining liability against estimates to complete the clean-up effort to determine if an adjustment to the environmental remediation liability is necessary to accurately represent management’s estimate of remaining cost to complete the project.

Deferred tax assets: The Partnership has a United States subsidiary corporation that has $1.0 million of deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2004. The majority of this balance represents net operating loss carryforwards resulting from the liquidation of our subsidiary in Canada. Management evaluates the likelihood of earning taxable income to absorb net operating loss carryforwards each reporting period to determine if deferred tax assets are likely to be utilized.

Item 3

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES
ABOUT MARKET RISK

Interest Rate Risk

As of June 30, 2004, the Partnership had $35.1 million of fixed rate debt outstanding with a fair value of approximately $35.8 million based on the current interest rates for similar financial instruments. A change in the interest rate on fixed rate debt will affect the fair value of the debt, whereas a change in the interest rate on variable rate debt will affect interest expense and cash flows. A hypothetical 1% increase in prevailing interest rates would decrease the fair value of the Partnership’s fixed-rate long-term debt obligations by $1.7 million.

Item 4

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Partnership’s management maintains an adequate system of internal controls to promote the timely identification and reporting of material, relevant information. Those controls include (1) requiring executive management and all managers in accounting roles to sign and adhere to a Code of Conduct and (2) implementation of a confidential hotline for employees to contact the Audit Committee directly with financial reporting concerns. Additionally the Partnership’s senior management team meets regularly to discuss significant transactions and events affecting the Partnership’s operations. The Partnership’s President & CEO and V.P. & CFO lead these meetings and consider whether topics discussed represent information that should be disclosed under generally accepted accounting principles and the rules of the SEC. The Board of Directors of the Partnership’s general partner includes an Audit Committee. The Audit Committee reviews the earnings release and all reports on Form 10-Q and 10-K prior to their filing. The Audit Committee is responsible for hiring the Partnership’s external auditors and meets with those auditors at least four times each year.

The Partnership’s President & CEO and V.P. & CFO are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures. They have designed such controls to ensure that others make all material information known to them within the organization. Management regularly evaluates ways to improve internal controls.

As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q our executive officers completed an evaluation of the disclosure controls and procedures and have determined them to be functioning properly and effectively. There were no significant changes in the Partnership’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II

Item 1:	Legal Proceedings

From time to time, the Partnership may be subject to legal proceedings and claims that may have a material adverse impact on its business. Management is not aware of any current legal proceedings or claims that will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse impact on its business, prospects, financial condition or results of operations.

Item 2:	Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds

	(a) – (e) None

Item 3:	Defaults upon Senior Securities

	None

Item 4:	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

	None

Item 5:	Other Information

	(a)	None

	(b)	There have been no material changes in the procedures for shareholders of the Partnership’s general partner to nominate directors to the board.

Item 6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

	(a) Exhibits.

	31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).

	31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).

	32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (furnished with this report in accordance with SEC Rel. No. 33-8238.

	32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (furnished with this report in accordance with SEC Rel. No. 33-8238.

	(b) Forms 8-K.

	On April 22, 2004, the Partnership filed a report on Form 8-K reporting earnings for the quarter ended March 31, 2004.

	On May 7, 2004, the Partnership filed a report on Form 8-K containing the President’s Letter, which was included in the Partnership’s Annual Report for the year ending December 31, 2003.

	On June 8, 2004, the Partnership filed a report on Form 8-K announcing the close of a $1.9 million land sale to Kitsap County.

	On June 17, 2004, the Partnership filed a report on Form 8-K announcing the signing of a purchase and sale agreement for 1.7 acres at the Gig Harbor site. The acres under this agreement are expected to be developed into a Walgreen’s store by the purchaser.

	On June 23, 2004, the Partnership filed a report on Form 8-K containing an attachment with materials representing a presentation to certain parties interested in investing in Pope Resources’ units.

	On June 29, 2004, the Partnership filed a report on Form 8-K announcing the sale of 205 acres of residential development property in Kitsap County.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on August 4, 2004.

	POPE RESOURCES, A Delaware Limited Partnership

	By:	POPE MGP, Inc.
		Managing General Partner


		By: /s/ David L. Nunes

		David L. Nunes
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)


		By: /s/ Thomas M. Ringo

		Thomas M. Ringo
		Vice President and CFO
		(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, David L. Nunes, President and CEO certify that:

	1.	I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Pope Resources, A Delaware Limited Partnership;

	2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

	3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

	4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

			(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

			(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

			(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

	5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

			(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

			(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 4, 2004

	/s/David L. Nunes

	David L. Nunes
	President and CEO

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Thomas M. Ringo, VP and CFO certify that:

	1.	I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Pope Resources, A Delaware Limited Partnership;

	2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

	3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

	4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

			(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

			(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

			(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

	5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

			(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

			(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 4, 2004

/s/Thomas M. Ringo

Thomas M. Ringo
VP and CFO

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pope Resources on Form 10-Q for the quarter and six month period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Periodic Report”), I, David L. Nunes, Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.	The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ David L. Nunes

David L. Nunes
President and Chief Executive Officer Pope MGP August 4, 2004

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pope Resources on Form 10-Q for the quarter and six month period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Periodic Report”), I, Thomas M. Ringo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.	The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Thomas M. Ringo

Thomas M. Ringo
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer August 4, 2004