Pope Resources

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 8-K

Current Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported) March 10, 2005

Pope Resources, A Delaware Limited Partnership
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware   91-1313292  
(State or other jurisdiction of  (I.R.S. Employer 
incorporation or organization)  Identification No.) 

19245 Tenth Avenue NE, Poulsbo, Washington     98370
(Address of principal executive of offices)      (ZIP Code) 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (360) 697-6626

NOT APPLICABLE
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (SEE General Instruction A.2. below):

[  ]

Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


[  ]

Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


[  ]

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-(b))


[  ]

Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT

Item 2.02 RESULTS OF OPERATION AND FINANCIAL CONDITION

On March 10, 2005 the registrant provided the attached presentations to certain parties interested in Pope Resources units. A copy of those presentations are attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and 99.2.

Item 9.01. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.   Description  
   
99.1  Presentation dated March 10, 2005 
99.2  Workshop presentation dated March 10, 2005 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                                                                         POPE RESOURCES, A DELAWARE LIMITED
                                                                                         PARTNERSHIP


DATE: March 10, 2005

BY:  /s/ Thomas M. Ringo
Thomas M. Ringo
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Pope
      Resources, A Delaware Limited Partnership,
      and Pope MGP, Inc., General Partner



Exhibit 99.1
Presentation dated March 10, 2005

Exhibit 99.2
Workshop presentation dated March 10, 2005



Investing in Timberlands

Investor Presentation – Florida

March 10, 2005




 

Safe Harbor

This presentation contains forward-looking statements. These forward-
looking statements are subject to a number of risks and should not be relied
upon as predictions of future events. Some of the forward-looking statements
can be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as “believes”,
“expects”, “may”, “will”, “should”, “seeks”, “approximately”, “intends”, “plans”,
“estimates”, “projects”, “strategy” or “anticipates” or the negative of those
words or other comparable terminology. Forward-looking statements involve
inherent risks and uncertainties. A number of important factors could cause
actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking
statements. Some of these factors include, but are not limited to: changes in
forestry, land use, environmental, and other governmental regulations; risk of
losses from fires, floods, windstorms, and other natural disasters; risk of loss
from insect infestations or tree diseases; changes in economic conditions and
competition in our domestic and export markets; an unanticipated reduction
in the demand for timber products and/or an unanticipated increase in the
supply of timber products; and other factors described from time to time in
our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

2




 

Investing in Timberlands - Agenda

Timberland investment thesis

Macroeconomic factors impacting timberland investments

Historical pricing

Investment attributes

Long-term returns

Diversification benefits

Tax efficiency

Risks of investing in timberlands

Ownership trends

Institutional investment performance

Summary

3

3




 

Summary of Timberland Investment Thesis

Timberland is well suited for high net worth investors

Strong risk-adjusted returns

Attractive portfolio diversification attributes

Multi-generational wealth preservation benefits

Short and long-term tax efficiency

Timberland is timely for the current investment climate

Tangible “hard” asset

Biological volume and value growth allow owners to “store value on the stump”

Attractive risk-adjusted returns relative to other investment alternatives

Opportune time to be getting into the timberland asset class

Long-term market fundamentals still strong

Numerous properties expected to trade over the next five years

4




 

Macroeconomic Factors Impacting Timberland Investments

Timber and timber-related product demand is driven by:

Population growth

Per capita GDP

Developed countries account for 75% of paper & paperboard consumption

By 2014, developing countries will contribute more to world GDP than
developed countries

Global timber supplies pressured by increasing environmental pressures
and growing rates of consumption

Supply pressures mitigated by

Greater use of technology by both producers and manufacturers of timber

Establishment of Southern Hemisphere plantations

Long-term supply increase, but with heavier hardwoods component

Will not adequately address growing sawtimber needs

5




 

Global Consumption of Softwood Sawtimber (1961-2001)

Source:  FAO

1961

1963

1965

1967

1969

1971

1973

1975

1977

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

0

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

700,000

800,000

Cubic
Meters
(000)

6




 

U. S. Private Timber Inventory Relative to Demand (1988-2001)

Inventory Trend:  -1.3% / Year

U.S. Sawnwood Consumption

U.S. Private Softwood Sawtimber Inventory

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Inven-
tory
(Billion
Board
Feet)

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

140,000

160,000

180,000

Con-
sumption
in
Cubic
Meters
(000)

Source: FAO, RISI

7




 

Historical Log and Stumpage Prices (1950-2002)

Source:  USFS, Log Lines, Timber Mart-South

$1

$10

$100

$1,000

$10,000

$/MBF –
Logarithmic
Scale

50

52

54

56

58

60

62

64

66

68

70

72

74

76

78

80

82

84

86

88

90

92

94

96

98

00

PNW Domestic Douglas-fir

Southern Pine Stumpage

Inflation (CPI)

8




 

Timberland Investment Attributes

Exceptional risk-adjusted returns

Timberland has outperformed other asset classes while having lower risk

Attractive diversification attributes

Negative correlation to other asset classes

Positive correlation to inflation

Ideal for long-term investment orientation

Unique opportunity to “store value on the stump”

Tax efficient asset class

Grows in value without generating tax liability

9




 

Risk and Return of Asset Classes (1973-2002)

Long-Term Corporate Bonds

U.S. Treasury Bills

Commercial Real Estate

Large Cap Equities

REITs

Small Cap Equities

International Equities

Timber

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

Standard Deviation (% / Year)

Note:   For purposes of calculating the Sharpe ratio we use 3.8%, the 10-year Treasury Note rate.

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%

16.0%

Annual
Rate of
Return (%)

10




 

Historical Correlations with Timberland Returns (1973-2002)

Commercial Real Estate*

International Equities

Small Cap Equities*

Large Cap Equities

Long-Term Corporate
Bonds

U.S. Treasury Bills

REITs

-18%

-12%

26%

-19%

-40%

-12%

-15%

-50%

-40%

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

*Data for small cap equities and commercial real estate are from 1979-2002

11




 

Efficient Frontiers (1973-2002)

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

Risk (%)

Without Timber

With Timber

At a 10% rate of return, an efficient

portfolio with  timber is approximately

123 basis points less risky.

Conversely at a 4% level of risk, an

efficient portfolio with timber can gain an

additional 106 basis points of return.

Portfolios optimized with 20% constraint for commercial real estate, REITs, & timber. Optimal timber portfolio at 10% return has 14% timber allocation.

Return (%)

12




 

Timber as a Tax Efficient Preserver of Wealth

Time-tested technique for passing wealth on to future generations in a tax-
efficient manner

Timber adds volume and value growth without generating near-term tax
liability

Harvest income from timber held in flow through vehicles enjoys
preferential capital gains tax treatment

Potential for arbitrage opportunities by acquiring undervalued younger
stands and passing those on to younger generations

Timber age classes are not valued in a linear manner

13




 

Risks of  Investing in Timber

Timberland is a relatively illiquid asset

Varies by age of timber and size of property

Three factors that have created an increasingly more liquid asset class:

Greater acceptance by the investment community

More monetization of timber assets by integrated forest products companies

Greater number of publicly traded “pure play” timber equities

Cyclical market conditions over long holding period

Selection and conduct of asset manager

Substitution threats

Other species from other geographies

Engineered wood products

Non-wood products

Fire is generally not considered a significant risk

Historically less than 0.5% of commercial timberland owned by institutional
investors is damaged by fire, insects, disease and other natural hazards

14




 

Investing in Timberlands - Upside Potential and Downside Risks

Upside Potential for Timberlands

Weak dollar

Strong Yen improves U.S. log exports

Strong Euro will impede European
lumber imports into U.S.

Stronger Canadian dollar will put upward
price pressure on lumber prices

Asian economic growth

Improving fundamentals in Japan

China becoming a larger importer of U.S.
logs

Strong underlying demographics
continuing to fuel robust housing starts
and repair & remodel spending in U.S.

Continued growth in acceptance of
timberland asset class will improve
liquidity and values

Downside Risks for Timberlands

Short term spike in interest rates
that would result in significant drop
in housing starts

Significant drop in refinancing
activity could ripple through to
lower repair & remodel spending

Resolution of U.S. Canadian lumber
trade dispute that resulted in
significant increase in Canadian
lumber imports into U.S.

Growing supplies of global
plantation timber that could put
downward pressure on prices

Unforeseen regulatory changes

15




 

Shift in U.S. Timberland Ownership

Institutions began to invest directly in timberlands in the 1980’s
following the passage of ERISA

Institutional owners control over $12 billion in direct timberland
ownership

Timberland investment attributes better understood with the launch of
the NCREIF Timberland Index in the early 1990’s and the growth of
early Timberland Investment Management Organizations (TIMO’s)

Publicly traded forest products companies sold significant timberlands
beginning in the late 1980’s

Finance pulp and paper expansion

Pay down debt

Monetize timber not being factored into equity valuations

Vertical integration less of a need

Tax advantaged REIT, MLP, and other private equity structures are
resulting in more timberland transactions flowing to institutional
owners and pure-play timber companies

16




 

NCREIF Timberland Return - Total Return (1987-2003)

-10%

-5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

EBITDDA

Cap. App.

Annual
Return

17




 

Future Outlook for Timberland Ownership

Timberland ownership will continue to flow to institutional owners and
pure play timber companies

Timber is still in the process of being “discovered” by institutional investors

Compelling tax advantages of flow-through entities relative to C-Corps

Timberland will become increasingly more liquid asset as these changes occur

Timberland return expectations will evolve (moderate)

Many investors were drawn to asset class based on anomaly of early 1990’s
returns associated with the listing of the Northern Spotted Owl

New investors have more modest return expectations

Global market forces and product substitution will continue to work pricing
inefficiencies out of log markets, lowering pricing volatility and risk

Other species from other geographies

Engineered wood products

Non wood products

As timberland markets evolve, more emphasis will be placed on
management expertise and value added silvicultural investments

18




 

Summary

Strong underlying supply-demand fundamentals

Timberland is a well-suited asset for most high net worth portfolios

Asset class still relatively undiscovered

Timberland asset markets are becoming more liquid as more financial
buyers enter the market

Timberland is timely for the current investment climate

Afternoon Workshop on Timberland Investing                     

Investment considerations

Investment options

Pope Resources LP

ORM Timber Fund I LP

19




 

Investing in Timberlands

20



Investing in Timberlands - Workshop Session

Investor Presentation - Florida

March 10, 2005




 

Safe Harbor

This presentation contains forward-looking statements. These forward-looking
statements are subject to a number of risks and should not be relied upon as
predictions of future events. Some of the forward-looking statements can be
identified by the use of forward-looking words such as “believes”, “expects”, “may”,
“will”, “should”, “seeks”, “approximately”, “intends”, “plans”, “estimates”, “projects”,
“strategy” or “anticipates” or the negative of those words or other comparable
terminology. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties. A
number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from
those described in the forward-looking statements. Some of these factors include,
but are not limited to: changes in forestry, land use, environmental, and other
governmental regulations; risk of losses from fires, floods, windstorms, and other
natural disasters; risk of loss from insect infestations or tree diseases; changes in
economic conditions and competition in our domestic and export markets; an
unanticipated reduction in the demand for timber products and/or an unanticipated
increase in the supply of timber products; and other factors described from time to
time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

2




 

Investing in Timberlands - Agenda

Timberland investment thesis

Timberland investment considerations

How to invest in timberlands

Investment management value drivers

Role of investment manager

ORM Timber Fund I

Pope Resources

Summary

3




 

Summary of Timberland Investment Thesis

Timberland is well suited for high net worth investors

Strong risk-adjusted returns

Attractive portfolio diversification attributes

Multi-generational wealth preservation benefits

Short and long-term tax efficiency

Timberland is timely for the current investment climate

Tangible “hard” asset

Biological volume and value growth allow owners to “store value on the stump”

Attractive risk-adjusted returns relative to other investment alternatives

Opportune time to be getting into the timberland asset class

Long-term market fundamentals still strong

Numerous properties expected to trade over the next five years

4




 

Timberland Investment Considerations

Liquidity requirements

Investment time horizon

Total return expectations

Current yield vs. long-term capital appreciation

Portfolio allocation

Geographic diversification

Form of investment

Selection of manager or investment advisor

5




 

How to Invest in Timberlands

Publicly traded integrated forest products companies

Weyerhaeuser, International Paper

“Pure-play” publicly traded timber companies

Timber REITs - Plum Creek, Rayonier

MLP - Pope Resources

Other - TimberWest (Canadian)

Closed-end private equity timber funds offered by Timberland Investment
Management Organizations (TIMOs)

National presence - Hancock Timber Res., Campbell Group, Forest Capital,   
Forest Investment Assoc., GMO

Southern only - Resource Management Service, Molpus Woodlands

Western only - ORM

Other - Forestland Group (hardwoods), Global Forest Partners (offshore)

Direct separate account investment through TIMOs (for pension funds)

Direct investment

6




 

Timberland Investment Management Value Drivers

Acquisition cost

Has a critical bearing on overall performance

Forest management

Growth and yield modeling critical component of projecting future harvest levels

Forests are a biological factory where wood can be “stored on the stump”

Log marketing

Product price optimization

Flexibility to change harvest levels in response to changes in market cycles

Application of advanced silvicultural treatments

Disposition value maximization

Small tract HBU sales

Final disposition

7




 

Role of a Timberland Investment Manager

Acquisition Process

Forest Management

Portfolio Management

Disposition Process

- Disciplined approach

- Improve productivity

- Return to holding analysis

- Exit strategy  well

- Inventory assessment &

  through advanced silvi-

  used to guide hold/sell

  developed

  verfication

  cultural practices (being

  decisions

- Knowledge of buyers

- Sensitive area set asides

  better farmers)

- HBU sale opportunities

- Timing and execution of

- Growth & yield modeling

- Lower management costs

- Opportunistic portfolio

  sales process

- Harvest schedule modeling

  through economies of

  management

- Reputation of property

- Harvesting and manage-

  scale

  through conduct of

  ment cost estimates

- Optimize harvest revenues

  timberland manager

- Capital expenditures

  through market timing,

- Comparable sales analysis

  improved utilization,

- Discount rate assessment

  and log merchandizing

- Sensitivity analysis

- Maximize other revenues

- Price forecasting

- Stewardship reputation

8




 

Olympic Resource Management and Timber

Owner and manager of timberland in the Pacific Northwest since 1853

Parent company, Pope Resources, is a publicly traded partnership (Nasdaq:
POPEZ)

Nationally recognized timberland management firm, having provided turnkey
timberland management services on 1.5 million acres of timberland in Washington,
Oregon, and California

Western region manager for HTRG (1998 to 2002) on 29 tree farms

Business and timberland manager for Pioneer Resources (2000-2003)

Timberland manager for Cascade Timberlands (2005 - )

Experienced management team with proven track record of adding value

Disciplined acquisition and portfolio management processes

Sophisticated in-house planning tools and systems

Geographic reach and expertise of field forestry staff

Economies of scale

Certified with both FSC and SFI third-party certification systems

Extensive real estate experience capturing HBU land values

9




 

ORM Timber Fund I, LP

Private equity vehicle for investing in Pacific Northwest timberland properties

Target return of 10% to 12% per year

Investment term - 10 years

ORM LLC will act as GP

Fund size - $50 million of equity capital

Co-investment by GP or its affiliates of 10% of equity capital raised

Management co-investment of $150,000 by top five managers

Minimum investment size of $500,000 by accredited investors

Fees:  

Annual asset management fee of 1% on committed capital

Back end participation fee

Split 80/20 between LP’s and GP after 8% preferred return

10




 

Why Invest in Pacific Northwest Timberlands

Structural characteristics of Douglas-fir

More upside potential to participate in Asian export markets

Less substitution risk relative to other species

Main substitution risk for Douglas-fir is high valued engineered wood products

Less susceptible than the U.S. South to impacts of declining competitiveness
of North American pulp and paper production

More upside return potential from management activities

Log merchandizing

Log marketing

Stable regulatory environment relative to other timberland geographies

Highly regulated, but known, regulatory environment

11




 

Acquisition Philosophy – Timber Fund I

Pursue properties that may be overlooked by others

Property size

Location

Past management

Utilize ORM contacts to surface potential deals

Extensive industry network

Third party management associations

Leverage off our recent acquisition success

Credibility in marketplace

Efficient property review and reasonable contingencies

Financial capacity

Ability to close quickly

12




 

ORM Timber Fund I - Conceptual Design

Pope

Resources

Pope

EGP

Pope

MGP

ORM, Inc.

Olympic Resource

Management,

LLC

Hood Canal

Tree Farm

Columbia

Tree Farm

ORM

Timber

Fund I LP

New Timber

Properties

Limited

Partnership

Investors

71,000 Acres

Puget Sound, WA

44,000 Acres

SW Washington

LP

GP

13




 

Pope Resources Overview

Last remaining timber MLP

Established in 1985 as a spin-off from Pope & Talbot

4.6 million units outstanding, with limited public float

22% controlled by GP’s and broader “family” ownership

31% controlled by Private Capital Management

Limited institutional ownership

Over one-third held by retail investors

Thinly traded

Market capitalization of $160 million

Enterprise value of approximately $195 million

2004 revenues of $40 million

2004 net income of $10 million or $2.22/unit

2004 EBITDDA of $19 million

Unit distribution of $0.15/quarter (return of capital)

14




 

Pope Resources Ownership

General Partners

Two corporate GP’s own collectively
about 1.5% of Pope Resources

Each of GP’s owned 50/50 by Peter
Pope and his cousin, Emily
Andrews

$150,000/year management fee,  
unchanged since spin-off

Sliding-scale profit-sharing interest
in third-party service subsidiary

Limited Partners

Private Capital Management at
31% (initial stake in 1993)

“Family” position at 22% (including
GP interest)

Limited other institutional
ownership

Over one-third held by retail
investors

U.S. Trust

3.7%

Rutabaga Cap. Mgt.

2.9%

Royce & Associates

0.7%

Hollencrest

0.5%

Management

0.6%

Outside Directors

0.3%

Private Cap. Mgt.

31.3%

All Other

36.4%

Other Inst.

1.1%

GP Ownership

22.5%

15




 

Pope Resources Business Segments

Fee Timber

115,000 acres of timberland in western Washington

Produced 60 MMBF of log harvest volume in 2004

Future growth will be through co-investment in ORM Timber Funds

Timberland Management & Consulting

Provide third-party timberland management services to other owners of timber,
leveraging off our timberland management expertise and providing additional
economies of scale

Launch of $50 million private equity fund, ORM Timber Fund I

ORM has managed 1.5 million acres of industrial timberland in the Western U.S. and
Canada for HTRG, Pioneer Resources, and Cascade Timberlands

Real Estate

3,000 acres of higher and better use properties near population centers

Seeking development entitlements to add value to land

Primary role is as a master developer, selling lands to other developers following
entitlement process

Ownership and management of historic mill town of Port Gamble

16




 

Pope Resources Growth Strategy

Free cash flow, after debt service and distributions, of $5 to $7 million per year,
depending on log prices

Used for co-investment in ORM Timber Funds

Opportunistically pursue fee (owned) timberland acquisitions

Where appropriate, invest in real estate projects

Potential to increase unit distribution with excess cash

Growth capital

Near-term growth fueled primarily by organic cash flow generation

Debt capacity

Between $50 and $80 million of incremental debt capacity, depending upon the
value of Units and cash flows

Debt to total capitalization covenant of 50% (currently 24% - market equity)

No current expectation for secondary offering of units

Maintain modest unit distribution

Current distribution is $0.60/unit per year, or a yield of 1.7%

17




 

Fee Timber Strategy

Acquisition of Columbia tree farm in 2001 from Plum Creek filled age-class gap
and leveled off age classes older than 30 years

Recent acquisitions will push 2005 harvest to 79 MMBF

Addition of 12 MMBF in each of years 2004 and 2005 as result of January 2004
acquisition

Addition of 21 MMBF in 2005 as result of November 2004 acquisition

Beginning in 2006, base non-declining harvest level of 53 MMBF for
subsequent decade

Look to add to fee (owned) timberland base

Opportunistic/contrarian approach to timber acquisitions

Acquisitions involving debt likely to be dilutive to earnings initially

Much of fee timber growth will come through co-investment in new ORM
Timber Funds

Will allow Pope Resources to participate in acquisition economies associated with
larger transactions

18




 

Productive Acres & Inventory by Age Class (1/1/05)

-

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

18,000

Clearcut

0 - 4

5 - 9

10 - 14

15 - 19

20 - 24

25 - 29

30 - 34

35 - 39

40 - 44

45 - 49

50 - 54

55 - 59

60 - 64

65+

Age Class

Productive
  Acres by
    Age
   Class

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

MMBF
Inventory
by Age
Class

Total

Merchantable

Inventory

486 MMBF

Total Productive Acres

99,556 Acres

19




 

Timberland Management & Consulting Strategy

Manage timberlands for third-party clients

Full-service management, selected forestry consulting services, workout specialist

Focus development of expert processes/tools, and market presence

Ancillary benefits accrue to fee timber properties through management expertise and
economies of scale

Fit with broad ownership trends in industry

Raise capital for investing in timberlands: ORM Timber Fund I, L.P.

$50 million of equity capital

10% co-investment by Pope Resources and affiliates

ORMLLC will serve as GP

20




 

Cascade Timberlands Assignment

Crown Pacific bankruptcy plan approved in December 2004

ORM served in advisory role to lenders during second half of 2004

ORM hired as timberland manager for newly formed entity, Cascade Timberlands LLC

522,000 acres in Washington and Oregon

Cascade Timberlands has its own Board of Directors

ORM commenced operations in January

Hired 12 new foresters and opened three offices

Conducting detailed inventory assessment to inform hold vs. sell strategy

Duration of contract expected to be 1-2 years

Assignment designed to bridge the ramp-up of ORM timber fund business

Allowing retention of key technical and operational personnel

Providing development opportunities for timberland management personnel

21




 

Real Estate Strategy

Push real estate properties through entitlement and permitting pipeline

To point where sale opportunity is optimal

May retain selected properties where management is passive and income stream is
steady with upside

Major early-stage entitlement projects

Gig Harbor - 320 acre mixed-use project within city limits

Commercial rezone effort enables future sale to Costco, Walgreen’s, YMCA

New Tacoma Narrows bridge impact

Bremerton - 260 acre mixed-use project with 15 year development agreement

Kingston - 720 acre project subject to urban growth boundary determination

Port Gamble historic mill town is a many-faceted, long-term project

Rural historic town designation under State’s Growth Management Act

Water rights recently secured

Environmental cleanup complete

Sewer system expansion needed for build-out of town site

Long term: development of former mill site and remaining portion of town site

22




 

Pope Resources - Summary of Investment Opportunity

Still a discount to NAV in spite of 2004-05 rise in unit price

Imputed value of fee timberlands of approximately $1,500 assuming value of HBU
lands of $10K/acre

Enterprise value to EBITDDA multiple of 10

Trading at 16 times trailing 12-month earnings

Highly tax-efficient vehicle for investing in timberland asset class

Positive tax yield

Modest distribution yield

Compelling diversification benefits of timberland asset class

Adding value through use of free cash flow

Co-investment in ORM Timber Fund I, L.P.

Opportunistic acquisitions

Opportunity for increases in distribution level

Improved alignment with insider buying in past few years

Favorable liquidity trends

23




 

Pope Resources Trading Volume

-

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

400,000

450,000

500,000

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

Trading
Volume   

-

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

Non-block
Trades

Annual Non-Block

Trading Volume

(left axis)

Number of

Non-Block Trades

(right axis)

24




 

Tax Advantages of Investing in Pope Resources Units

A

B

C

Pope Resources 1065

Resultant

Aggregate

Per

Applicable

Tax (Liability)/

Amounts

Unit

Tax

Benefit

Reported

Amounts

Rate

(

B

times

-C

)

28.00

$  

32.00

$  

36.00

$  

40.00

$  

New Tax Rates:

K-1 Taxable Income

4,600,000

         

1.00

$           

1231 gain

14,000,000

        

3.05

$           

15.0%

(0.46)

$            

Int income

200,000

            

0.04

            

35.0%

(0.02)

               

Ord loss

(9,600,000)

        

(2.09)

            

35.0%

0.73

               

4,600,000

         

1.00

$           

0.26

$              

0.9%

0.8%

0.7%

0.6%

Note: Income amounts provided are representative examples only and should not be interpreted as pro forma results. As such, the amounts shown in

this worksheet represent management's estimates based on general tax principles. Individual tax consequences will vary from investor to investor,

and you should consult with your own tax advisor about the specific tax consequences in light of your own investment and income profile.

Tax "Yield" at Various Unit Prices

25




 

Summary

Timberland is a well-suited asset for most high net worth portfolios

Asset class still relatively undiscovered

Timberland asset markets are becoming more liquid as more financial buyers
enter the market

Timberland investment can take different forms

Publicly traded equity

Private equity fund

Direct investment

Form of timberland investment is dependent on numerous factors             

Investment time horizon

Liquidity requirements

Return expectations

Portfolio allocation

Selection of timberland investment manager

26




 

Investing in Timberlands