SEC Filing | Rayonier Inc.

View:

Download DOC

Download PDF

Download XLS

Download XBRL

a50049025.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

Form 10-Q

( X )

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011

( )

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 1-9035

POPE RESOURCES, A DELAWARE

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	91-1313292
(State or other jurisdiction of	(IRS Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification Number)

19245 10th Avenue NE, Poulsbo, WA 98370

Telephone: (360) 697-6626

(Address of principal executive offices including zip code)

(Registrant's telephone number including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)

	Large Accelerated Filer o	Accelerated Filer x
	Non-accelerated Filer o	Smaller Reporting Company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes o No x

Partnership units outstanding at November 4, 2011: 4,387,903

Pope Resources

Index to Form 10-Q Filing

For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2011

Description	Page Number
Part I. Financial Information

Item 1 Financial Statements (unaudited)
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations	5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	6
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	13

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	35

Item 4. Controls and Procedures	36

Part II. Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings	36

Item 1A. Risk Factors	36

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	38

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities	38

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	38

Item 5. Other Information	38

Item 6. Exhibits	38

Signatures	39

P A R T I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
Pope Resources, a Delaware Limited Partnership
September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010
(Thousands)
	2011		2010
ASSETS
Current assets
Partnership cash and cash equivalents	$	166	$	237
ORM Timber Funds cash and cash equivalents		1,073		2,186
Cash and cash equivalents		1,239		2,423
Accounts receivable, net		1,160		543
Building and land held for sale		1,148		3
Current portion of contracts receivable		18		219
Prepaid expenses and other		708		805
Total current assets		4,273		3,993
Properties and equipment, at cost
Timber and roads, net of accumulated depletion
of $67,626 and $60,044		158,055		164,961
Timberland		34,111		33,980
Land held for development		28,370		27,737
Buildings and equipment, net of accumulated
depreciation of $6,090 and $7,739		5,968		3,854
Total properties and equipment, at cost		226,504		230,532
Other assets
Contracts receivable, net of current portion		569		652
Other		685		660
Total other assets		1,254		1,312
Total assets	$	232,031	$	235,837

LIABILITIES, PARTNERS' CAPITAL AND NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	1,499	$	868
Accrued liabilities		2,849		2,656
Current portion of long-term debt		31		30
Deferred revenue		467		674
Other current liabilities		361		588
Total current liabilities		5,207		4,816
Long-term liabilities
Long-term debt, net of current portion		47,380		50,468
Other long-term liabilities		1,722		1,746
Partners' capital and noncontrolling interests
General partners' capital (units issued and outstanding 60 and 60)		1,036		992
Limited partners' capital (units issued and outstanding 4,269 and 4,203)		73,660		69,998
Noncontrolling interests		103,026		107,817
Total partners' capital and noncontrolling interests		177,722		178,807
Total liabilities, partners' capital, and noncontrolling interests	$	232,031	$	235,837

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)

Pope Resources, a Delaware Limited Partnership
For the Three Months and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010
(Thousands, except per unit data)

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010

Revenue	$	7,522		$	8,591		$	39,465		$	22,646
Cost of timber and land sold		(4,449	)		(4,566	)		(20,366	)		(10,997	)
Operating expenses		(2,887	)		(2,127	)		(8,105	)		(6,092	)
Real estate environmental remediation		(2	)		(5	)		(346	)		(568	)
General and administrative expenses		(950	)		(1,004	)		(3,192	)		(3,397	)
Income (loss) from operations		(766	)		889			7,456			1,592

Other income (expense)
Interest expense		(559	)		(493	)		(1,674	)		(1,355	)
Debt extinguishment costs		-			-			-			(1,250	)
Capitalized interest		108			142			314			460
Interest income		10			30			32			91
Realized gain on investments		-			-			-			11
Total other expense		(441	)		(321	)		(1,328	)		(2,043	)

Income (loss) before income taxes		(1,207	)		568			6,128			(451	)
Income tax benefit (expense)		(19	)		37			(158	)		25
Net income (loss)		(1,226	)		605			5,970			(426	)

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
ORM Timber Funds		664			445			435			801
Net income (loss) attributable to unitholders	$	(562	)	$	1,050		$	6,405		$	375

Allocable to general partners	$	(8	)	$	14		$	89		$	5
Allocable to limited partners		(554	)		1,036			6,316			370
	$	(562	)	$	1,050		$	6,405		$	375

Earnings (loss) per unit attributable to unitholders
Basic	$	(0.14	)	$	0.23		$	1.42		$	0.07
Diluted	$	(0.14	)	$	0.22		$	1.42		$	0.07

Weighted average units outstanding
Basic		4,329			4,567			4,321			4,546
Diluted		4,329			4,603			4,323			4,583

Distributions per unit	$	0.35		$	0.25		$	0.85		$	0.45

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
Pope Resources, a Delaware Limited Partnership
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010
(Thousands)
	2011			2010
Net income (loss)	$	5,970		$	(426	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities
Depletion		7,618			3,909
Capitalized development activities, net of reimbursements		(743	)		(743	)
Equity-based compensation		738			568
Excess tax benefit from equity-based compensation		-			(104	)
Depreciation and amortization		526			485
Gain on investments		-			(11	)
Deferred taxes		(43	)		(183	)
Cost of land sold		110			67
Write-off of debt issuance costs		-			32
Cash flows from changes in operating accounts
Accounts receivable, net		(637	)		(708	)
Contracts receivable		284			157
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		79			89
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		825			1,742
Deferred revenue		(207	)		60
Other current liabilities		38			20
Environmental remediation		(264	)		378
Other long-term liabilities		(24	)		(26	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		14,270			5,306

Cash flows from investing activities
Redemption of investments		-			1,497
Reforestation and roads		(886	)		(339	)
Buildings and equipment		(3,548	)		(235	)
ORM Timber Fund II, Inc. land acquisition		(140	)		(58,206	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(4,574	)		(57,283	)

Cash flows from financing activities
Repayment of line of credit, net		(3,064	)		-
Repayment of long-term debt		(23	)		(1,031	)
Extinguishment of long-term debt		-			(18,554	)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		-			31,000
Debt issuance costs		-			(283	)
Unit repurchases		-			(355	)
Proceeds from option exercises, net		516			573
Payroll taxes paid upon restricted unit vesting		(226	)		-
Excess tax benefit from equity-based compensation		-			104
Cash distributions to unitholders		(3,727	)		(2,080	)
Cash distributions - ORM Timber Funds, net of distributions to Partnership		(4,348	)		-
Capital call - ORM Timber Fund II, Inc.		-			38,800
Preferred stock issuance - ORM Timber Fund II, Inc.		-			125
Preferred stock distribution - ORM Timber Fund II, Inc.		(8	)		(8	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(10,880	)		48,291

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(1,184	)		(3,686	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		2,423			7,180
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the nine-month period	$	1,239		$	3,494

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

POPE RESOURCES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

September 30, 2011

The condensed consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and for the three- and nine-month periods then ended have been prepared by Pope Resources, A Delaware Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”) pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). The condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited, but, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments and accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods. The financial information as of December 31, 2010, is derived from the Partnership’s audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2010, and should be read in conjunction with such financial statements and notes. The results of operations for the interim periods are not indicative of the results of operations that may be achieved for the entire fiscal year ending December 31, 2011.

2.	The financial statements in the Partnership's 2010 annual report on Form 10-K include a summary of significant accounting policies of the Partnership and should be read in conjunction with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Basic net earnings (loss) per unit are calculated by dividing net income (loss) attributable to unitholders, adjusted for non-forfeitable distributions paid out to unvested restricted unitholders and Fund II preferred shareholders, by the weighted average units outstanding during the period. Diluted net earnings (loss) per unit are calculated by dividing net income (loss) attributable to unitholders, adjusted for non-forfeitable distributions paid out to unvested restricted unitholders and Fund II preferred shareholders, by the weighted average units outstanding during the year plus additional units that would have been outstanding assuming the exercise of in-the-money unit equivalents using the treasury stock method, unless the assumed exercise is antidilutive.

The table below displays how we arrived at options used to calculate dilutive unit equivalents and subsequent treatment of dilutive unit equivalents based on net income (loss) for the period:

	Quarter Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
(Thousands)	2011			2010			2011		2010
Average per unit trading price	$	45.17		$	25.75		$	43.34	$	26.13
Total options outstanding at end of period		6			103			6		103
Less: options with strike price above average trading price (out-of-the-money)		-			(2	)		-		(2	)
Options used in calculation of dilutive unit equivalents		6			101			6		101

Net income (loss) attributable to Pope Resources’ unitholders	$	(562	)	$	1,050		$	6,405	$	375

Dilutive unit equivalents used to calculate dilutive EPS		2			36			2		37
Less: unit equivalents considered anti-dilutive due to net loss in period		(2	)		-			-		-
Dilutive unit equivalents used to calculate dilutive EPS		-			36			2		37

The following table shows how we arrived at basic and diluted income (loss) per unit:

	Quarter Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
(Thousands)		2011			2010			2011			2010
Net income (loss) attributable to Pope Resources' unitholders	$	(562	)	$	1,050		$	6,405		$	375
Less:
Net income attributable to unvested restricted unitholders		(20	)		(16	)		(250	)		(29	)
Dividends paid to Fund II preferred shareholders		(4	)		(4	)		(12	)		(8	)
Net income (loss) for calculation of EPS	$	(586	)	$	1,030		$	6,143		$	338

Weighted average units outstanding (in thousands):
Basic		4,329			4,567			4,321			4,546
Dilutive effect of unit equivalents		-			36			2			37
Diluted		4,329			4,603			4,323			4,583

Earnings (loss) per unit: Basic	$	(0.14	)	$	0.23		$	1.42		$	0.07
Earnings (loss) per unit: Diluted	$	(0.14	)	$	0.22		$	1.42		$	0.07

Options to purchase 5,500 units at prices ranging from $10.75 to $17.40 were outstanding at September 30, 2011. There were no out-of-the money options to exclude from the calculation of dilutive unit equivalents for the quarter or nine months ended September 30, 2011. Options to purchase 102,810 units at prices ranging from $9.30 to $37.73 per unit were outstanding as of September 30, 2010. As of September 30, 2010, 1,869 options at prices ranging from $28.50 to $37.73 were excluded from the calculation of dilutive unit equivalents as they were out-of-the-money and, as such, anti-dilutive.

The Partnership granted 20,500 restricted units pursuant to a new management incentive compensation program in January 2011. These restricted units vest ratably over four years with the grant date fair value equal to the market price on the date of grant. We recognized $197,000 of equity compensation expense related to these restricted units in the first nine months of 2011 which includes accelerated expense related to retirement-eligible employees.

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: interest paid, net of amounts capitalized, totaled $1.3 million and $898,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Income taxes paid in the first nine months of 2011 was $46,000 compared to $5,000 of income taxes paid in the first nine months of 2010.

6.	The majority of the Company’s financial instruments are carried at fair value. Those include cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and contracts receivable. Pursuant to accounting guidance, these instruments for the period presented are considered a Level 1 fair value measurement.

The Partnership's long-term debt is not actively traded and, as such, fair values were estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on the Partnership’s current estimated incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements, which are considered level 3 inputs. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, consolidated fixed-rate debt outstanding had a fair value of approximately $46.6 million and $41.9 million, respectively.

7.	The Partnership has two general partners: Pope MGP, Inc. and Pope EGP, Inc. In total, these two entities own 60,000 partnership units. The allocation of distributions and loss between the general and limited partners is pro rata across all units outstanding.

In the presentation of the Partnership’s revenue and operating income (loss) by segment all intersegment revenue and expense is eliminated to determine externally reported operating income (loss) by business segment. The tables that follow reconcile internally reported income (loss) from operations to externally reported income (loss) from operations by business segment, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:

	Fee Timber
Three Months Ended	Pope Resources			ORM Timber			Total			Timberland Management &			Real
September 30, (Thousands)	Timber			Funds			Fee Timber			Consulting			Estate			Other			Consolidated
2011
Revenue internal	$	4,334		$	2,737		$	7,071		$	488		$	575		$	-		$	8,134
Eliminations		(112	)		-			(112	)		(488	)		(12	)		-			(612	)
Revenue external		4,222			2,737			6,959			-			563			-			7,522

Cost of timber and land sold		(1,896	)		(2,472	)		(4,368	)		-			(81	)		-			(4,449	)

Operating, general and
administrative expenses internal		(1,272	)		(909	)		(2,181	)		(445	)		(875	)		(950	)		(4,451	)
Eliminations		12			488			500			112			-			-			612
Operating, general and
administrative expenses external		(1,260	)		(421	)		(1,681	)		(333	)		(875	)		(950	)		(3,839	)

Income (loss) from operations
internal		1,166			(644	)		522			43			(381	)		(950	)		(766	)
Eliminations		(100	)		488			388			(376	)		(12	)		-			-
Income (loss) from operations
external	$	1,066		$	(156	)	$	910		$	(333	)	$	(393	)	$	(950	)	$	(766	)

2010
Revenue internal	$	6,581		$	1,721		$	8,302		$	412		$	340		$	-		$	9,054
Eliminations		(54	)		-			(54	)		(397	)		(12	)		-			(463	)
Revenue external		6,527			1,721			8,248			15			328			-			8,591

Cost of timber and land sold		(2,915	)		(1,648	)		(4,563	)		-			(3	)		-			(4,566	)

Operating, general and
administrative expenses internal		(845	)		(566	)		(1,411	)		(361	)		(823	)		(1,004	)		(3,599	)
Eliminations		12			394			406			57			-			-			463
Operating, general and
administrative expenses external		(833	)		(172	)		(1,005	)		(304	)		(823	)		(1,004	)		(3,136	)

Income (loss) from operations
internal		2,821			(493	)		2,328			51			(486	)		(1,004	)		889
Eliminations		(42	)		394			352			(340	)		(12	)		-			-
Income (loss) from operations
external	$	2,779		$	(99	)	$	2,680		$	(289	)	$	(498	)	$	(1,004	)	$	889

	Fee Timber
Nine Months Ended	Pope Resources			ORM Timber			Total			Timberland Management &			Real
September 30, (Thousands)	Timber			Funds			Fee Timber			Consulting			Estate			Other			Consolidated
2011
Revenue internal	$	$22,918		$	13,173		$	36,091		$	1,577		$	3,744		$	-		$	41,412
Eliminations		(334	)		-			(334	)		(1,577	)		(36	)		-			(1,947	)
Revenue external		22,584			13,173			35,757			-			3,708			-			39,465

Cost of timber and land sold		(9,434	)		(10,507	)		(19,941	)		-			(425	)		-			(20,366	)

Operating, general and
administrative expenses internal		(3,382	)		(2,699	)		(6,081	)		(1,448	)		(2,869	)		(3,192	)		(13,590	)
Eliminations		39			1,577			1,616			331			-			-			1,947
Operating, general and
administrative expenses external		(3,343	)		(1,122	)		(4,465	)		(1,117	)		(2,869	)		(3,192	)		(11,643	)

Income (loss) from operations
internal		10,102			(33	)		10,069			129			450			(3,192	)		7,456
Eliminations		(295	)		1,577			1,282			(1,246	)		(36	)		-			-
Income (loss) from operations
external	$	$9,807		$	1,544		$	11,351		$	(1,117	)	$	414		$	(3,192	)	$	7,456

*Includes $346,000 of environmental remediation expense

2010
Revenue internal	$	18,504		$	3,427		$	21,931		$	1,002		$	844		$	-		$	23,777
Eliminations		(108	)		-			(108	)		(987	)		(36	)		-			(1,131	)
Revenue external		18,396			3,427			21,823			15			808			-			22,646

Cost of timber and land sold external		(8,014	)		(2,977	)		(10,991	)		-			(6	)		-			(10,997	)

Operating, general and
administrative expenses internal		(2,443	)		(1,385	)		(3,828	)		(1,041	)		(2,922	)		(3,397	)		(11,188	)
Eliminations		39			971			1,010			121			-			-			1,131
Operating, general and
administrative expenses external		(2,404	)		(414	)		(2,818	)		(920	)		(2,922	) *		(3,397	)		(10,057	)

Income (loss) from operations
internal		8,047			(935	)		7,112			(39	)		(2,084	)		(3,397	)		1,592
Eliminations		(69	)		971			902			(866	)		(36	)		-			-
Income (loss) from operations
external	$	7,978		$	36		$	8,014		$	(905	)	$	(2,120	)	$	(3,397	)	$	1,592

*Includes $568,000 of environmental remediation expense

The Funds were formed by Olympic Resource Management LLC (ORMLLC), a wholly owned subsidiary of Pope Resources, for the purpose of attracting capital to purchase timberlands. The objective of these Funds is to generate a return on investments through the acquisition, management, value enhancement and sale of timberland properties. Both Funds will operate for a term of ten years from the end of the drawdown period, with Fund I terminating August 2017 and Fund II terminating March 2021. Pope Resources and ORMLLC together own 20% of each Fund and both Funds are consolidated into the Partnership’s financial statements. The Funds’ statements of operations included management fees paid to ORMLLC which are eliminated in consolidation. The Partnership’s consolidated balance sheet included assets and liabilities of the Funds as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, which were as follows:

ORM Timber Funds

(Thousands)	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,073	$	2,186
Other current assets		447		413
Total current assets		1,520		2,599
Timber and roads, net		120,731		125,456
Timberlands		18,747		18,607
Other assets		130		141
Total assets	$	141,128	$	146,803
Liabilities and equity:
Current liabilities	$	1,253	$	954
Current portion of long-term debt		31		30
Long-term debt		11,044		11,068
Total liabilities		12,328		12,052
Funds' equity		128,800		134,751
Total liabilities and equity	$	141,128	$	146,803

10.

During the third quarter of 2011, the Partnership had net incremental borrowings of $1.2 million on its operating line of credit, increasing the outstanding borrowings from $5.3 million at June 30, 2011 to $6.5 million at September 30, 2011. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Partnership repaid $3.1 million on the operating line of credit, reducing outstanding borrowings from $9.6 million at December 31, 2010. The outstanding borrowings are recorded within long-term debt because the line of credit does not mature until 2013 and predictability of cash flows in light of operating needs is not reliable enough to suggest a meaningful and accurate bifurcation of what portion of the line of credit can or will be paid down in the near term

Accrued interest relating to all debt instruments was $492,000 and $453,000 at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, and is included in accrued liabilities.

11.

The Partnership has an accrual for estimated environmental remediation costs of $1.7 million as of September 30, 2011 and $1.9 million as of December 31, 2010. The environmental remediation liability represents estimated payments to be made to monitor and remedy certain areas in and around the townsite and millsite at Port Gamble, Washington, and at Port Ludlow, Washington.

During the third quarter of 2011, the Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) performed some additional sampling during the quarter that will inform modification of the Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS). The updated RI/FS is scheduled to be issued by the end of 2011, followed by the development of a clean-up action plan and consent decree.

Additionally, during the third quarter of 2011 the DOE issued a “No Further Action” letter related to a separate remediation effort completed during the third quarter at Port Gamble confirming we have no further remediation obligations for the project. Total charges for this project were approximately $478,000.

The environmental remediation accrual also contains costs estimated in connection with a site located within the resort community of Port Ludlow. During the third quarter of 2011, additional investigative work was performed to further refine the characterization and extent of the contamination. During the fourth quarter of 2011, we will continue monitoring the site with the intent to obtain data which point toward feasibility of remedies if and when appropriate.

The environmental liability at September 30, 2011 is $1.7 million. Statistical models have been used to estimate the liability and suggest a potential aggregate range of loss of $744,000 to $3.8 million.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This report contains a number of projections and statements about our expected financial condition, operating results, and business plans and objectives. These statements reflect management’s estimates based upon our current goals, in light of management’s knowledge of existing circumstances and expectations about future developments. Statements about expectations and future performance are “forward looking statements” which describe our goals, objectives and anticipated performance. These statements are inherently uncertain, and some or all of these statements may not come to pass. Accordingly, you should not interpret these statements as promises that we will perform at a given level or that we will take any or all of the actions we currently expect to take. Our future actions, as well as our actual performance, will vary from our current expectations, and under various circumstances these variations may be material and adverse. Some of the factors that may cause our actual operating results and financial condition to fall short of our expectations are set forth in the part of this report entitled “Risk Factors” in PART II, ITEM 1A below. Some of the issues that may have an adverse and material impact on our business, operating results and financial condition include economic conditions that affect consumer demand for our products and the prices we receive for them both domestically and overseas, particularly in certain parts of Asia; government regulation that affects our ability to access our timberlands and harvest logs from those lands; the implications of significant indirect sales to overseas customers, including currency translation, regulatory and tax matters; the effect of financial market conditions on our investment portfolio and related liquidity; environmental and land use regulations that limit our ability to harvest timber and develop property; access to debt financing by our customers as well as ourselves; the impacts of climate change and natural disasters on our timberlands and on surrounding areas; and the potential impacts of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates as they affect demand for our products and customers’ ability to pay. From time to time we identify other risks and uncertainties in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The forward-looking statements in this report reflect our estimates as of the date of the report, and we cannot undertake to update these statements as our business operations and environment change.

This discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included with this report.

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

Pope Resources, A Delaware Limited Partnership (“we” or the “Partnership”), is engaged in three primary businesses. The first, and by far most significant segment in terms of owned assets and operations, is the Fee Timber segment. This segment includes timberlands owned directly by the Partnership and operations of the two private equity funds ("Funds"). When we refer to the timberland owned by the Partnership, we describe it as the Partnership’s tree farms. We refer to timberland owned by the Funds as the Funds’ tree farms. When referring collectively to the Partnership’s and Funds’ timberland we will refer to them as the Combined tree farms. Operations in this segment consist of growing timber to be harvested as logs for sale to export brokers and domestic manufacturers. The second most significant business in terms of total assets owned is the development and sale of real estate. Real Estate activities primarily take the form of securing permits, entitlements, and, in some cases, installing infrastructure for raw land development and then realizing that land’s value by selling larger parcels to buyers who will take the land further up the value chain, either to home buyers or to operators and lessors of commercial property. Since these land projects span multiple years, the Real Estate segment may incur losses for multiple years while a project is developed, and will not recognize operating income until that project is sold. In addition, within this segment we sometimes negotiate and sell conservation easements (CE’s) on Fee Timber properties to preclude future development. Our third business, which we refer to as Timberland Management & Consulting, or “TM&C,” is raising and investing capital from third parties for private equity timber funds, and thereafter managing those funds for the benefit of all investors.

Our current strategy for adding timberland acreage is centered on our private equity timber fund business model, which consists of raising investment capital from third-party investors and investing that capital, along with our own co-investment, into new timberland properties. We have raised two timber funds that have acquired a total of $150 million in commercial timberland properties. Our 20% co-investment in the Funds, which totals $28 million, affords us a share of the Funds’ operating cash flows while allowing us to earn asset management and timberland management fees as well as incentive fees based upon the overall success of each fund. Management also believes that this strategy allows us to maintain more sophisticated expertise in timberland acquisition, valuation, and management than could be cost-effectively maintained for the Partnership’s timberlands alone. We believe our co-investment strategy also boosts our credibility with existing and prospective investors by demonstrating that we have both an operational as well as a financial commitment to the Funds’ successes.

Land held for sale in western Washington by our Real Estate segment is suitable primarily for residential and commercial building sites. The markets for these resources have recently suffered along with regional and national markets, producing a decline in our sales. The primary challenges of our Real Estate segment center around how and when to “harvest” a parcel of land and capture the optimum value increment by selling the property, balancing the long-term risks of carrying and developing a property against the potential for income and positive cash flows upon sale.

Revenue and net income declined from the second to the third quarter in response to an expected increase in regional supply of logs and lumber as the arrival of summer marks the peak of logging operations in high elevation areas. This decline in harvest volume from the Combined tree farms results primarily from management’s strategy for timing our harvest volume to coincide with what we believe will be relatively higher log pricing. For example, we shifted what might otherwise have been third-quarter harvest volume into the second quarter of 2011 to avoid competing with a seasonal influx of wood into the market and softening of log prices. As a result we harvested 12 million board feet (MMBF) in the third quarter of 2011 compared to 19 MMBF in the second quarter of 2011 and 16 MMBF harvested in the third quarter of 2010. Realized log prices declined 5%, or $27 per thousand board feet (MBF), from $582/MBF to $555/MBF, between the second and third quarters of 2011. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 we harvested 61 MMBF compared to 42 MMBF for the first nine months of 2010. We expect our harvest volume for the full year 2011 to be between 86 and 89 MMBF, with the final total depending on the strength or weakness of log markets as well as weather patterns in the final quarter of the year.

We have a unit repurchase program which permits repurchases through December 2011. Between December 2008 and December 2010, we repurchased roughly 125,000 units with a weighted average unit purchase price of $20.04 and we have an unutilized authorization for unit repurchases of $2.5 million. On December 31, 2010, we repurchased 334,340 units from a single unitholder, outside the scope of the formal repurchase program, for $35.50 per unit (which excludes a $0.05 per unit commission paid on settlement). The units represented 7.2% of the total units outstanding at that time and were retired. We did not make any unit repurchases during the first nine months of either 2011 or 2010.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table reconciles and compares key revenue and cost elements that impacted our net income (loss) for the respective quarter and year-to-date periods ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010. In addition to the table’s numerical analysis, the explanatory text that follows the table describes certain of these changes by business segment.

	Quarter Ended			Nine Months Ended
	September 30,			September 30,
(Thousands)	Total			Total
Net income (loss) attributable to Pope Resources' unitholders:
2011 period	$	(562	)	$	6,405
2010 period		1,050			375
Variance	$	(1,612	)	$	6,030
Detail of variance:
Fee Timber
Log volumes (A)	$	(2,001	)	$	8,511
Log price realizations (B)		732			5,684
Production costs		46			(5,376	)
Depletion		149			(3,559	)
Other Fee Timber		(696	)		(1,923	)
Timberland Management & Consulting
Operating results		(44	)		(212	)
Real Estate
Land and conservation easement sales		83			2,403
Timber depletion on HBU sale		-			(150	)
Other Real Estate		19			59
Environmental remediation costs		3			222
General & administrative costs		54			205
Net interest expense		(120	)		(524	)
Debt extinguishment costs		-			1,250
Other		163			(560	)
Total variances	$	(1,612	)	$	6,030

(A) Volume variance calculated by extending change in sales volume by the average log sales price
for the comparison period.
(B) Price variance calculated by extending the change in average realized price by current period
sales volume.

Fee Timber

Fee Timber results include operations from 114,000 acres of timberland owned by the Partnership and 61,000 acres of timberland owned by the Funds. Fee Timber revenue is earned primarily from the harvest and sale of logs from these timberlands which are located in western Washington and northwestern Oregon. To a lesser extent, Fee Timber revenue also includes amounts realized from leasing cellular communication towers, gravel pits and other mineral resources from our timberlands. Our Fee Timber revenue is driven primarily by the volume of timber harvested, which is generally expressed in thousand board feet (MBF) or million board feet (MMBF). Fee Timber expenses, which consist predominantly of harvest, hauling, and depletion costs, vary directly and roughly proportionately with harvest volume and the resulting revenues. Revenue and costs related to harvest activities on timberland owned by the Funds are consolidated into this discussion of operations.

When discussing our Fee Timber operations, we compare current results to both the previous quarter and the corresponding quarter of the prior year. These comparisons offer an understanding of trends in log prices and patterns of harvest volumes that affect Fee Timber operating results. Revenue and operating income for the Fee Timber segment for the quarters ended September 30, 2011, June 30, 2011, and September 30, 2010 were as follows:

(Millions) Quarter Ended	Log Sale Revenue		Mineral, Cell Tower & Other Revenue		Total Fee Timber Revenue		Operating Income (Loss)			Harvest Volume (MMBF)
Partnership tree farms	$	3.8	$	0.4	$	4.2	$	1.1			7
Funds' tree farms		2.7		-		2.7		(0.2	)		5
Total Fee Timber September 30, 2011	$	6.5	$	0.4	$	6.9	$	0.9			12

Partnership tree farms	$	6.6	$	0.4	$	7.0	$	3.1			11
Funds' tree farms		4.3		-		4.3		0.2			8
Total Fee Timber June 30, 2011	$	10.9	$	0.4	$	11.3	$	3.3			19

Partnership tree farms	$	6.1	$	0.4	$	6.5	$	2.8			12
Funds' tree farms		1.7		-		1.7		(0.1	)		4
Total Fee Timber September 30, 2010	$	7.8	$	0.4	$	8.2	$	2.7			16

Comparing Q3 2011 to Q2 2011. Fee Timber revenue declined $4.4 million, or 39%, from second quarter as a result of a 7 MMBF, or 37%, decrease in volume harvested combined with a $27/MBF, or 5%, decrease in average log price realized. Harvest operations ordinarily are at their peak during the third quarter a time when harvest units are most accessible in the Pacific Northwest. This seasonal pattern typically results in a large volume flow of logs to markets and, subsequently, some softening in log prices as customers have more alternatives for log purchases. Operating income for the third quarter 2011 decreased by $2.4 million, or 73%, from second quarter results primarily as a result of lower harvest volumes, but also reflects increased harvest and road maintenance costs. The increased costs to harvest units with steep terrain helped to erode stumpage values realized. Road maintenance costs comprised $743,000, or 44%, of Combined operating expenses in the third quarter compared with $517,000, or 40%, of Combined operating expenses in the second quarter of 2011. Road maintenance costs increased as we worked to prepare roads for current and future harvest operations. The Funds generated $2.7 million of revenue in the third quarter of 2011 compared with revenue of $4.3 million in the second quarter of 2011. The Funds generated an operating loss of $156,000 during the third quarter compared to operating income of $235,000 during the second quarter on a 3 MMBF reduction in harvest volume. The decline in operating income was driven by a decrease in harvest volume and harvesting from units requiring higher cost cable logging.

Comparing Q3 2011 to Q3 2010. Fee Timber revenue for the third quarter of 2011 declined by $1.3 million, or 16%, over the comparable period in the prior year. The decrease in revenue is due to a 4 MMBF, or 26%, decrease in harvest volume offset partially by a $62/MBF, or 13%, increase in average log price realized. Stronger log pricing in the third quarter of 2011 relative to the comparable period in 2010 was driven by both strong export log markets and the indirect impact of heightened export lumber demand by China, which put upward pressure on domestic log prices. Operating income for the third quarter of 2011 decreased $1.8 million, or 66%, over the third quarter of 2010 due primarily to the reduced harvest volume. In addition, road maintenance costs increased from $330,000, or 33%, of Combined tree farm operating expenses in 2010 to $743,000, or 44%, of Combined tree farm operating expenses in 2011 as roads were being prepared for higher levels of future harvest operations. Third quarter 2011 Fund revenue increased 59% to $2.7 million from $1.7 million for the same quarter in 2010 on a 1 MMBF, or 34%, increase in harvest volume. Operating loss, however, for the period increased from $99,000 in 2010 to $156,000 in 2011 because higher harvest costs offset the effects of higher revenue between the two periods.

(Millions) Nine Months Ended		Log Sale Revenue		Mineral, Cell Tower & Other Revenue		Total Fee Timber Revenue		Operating Income	Harvest Volume (MMBF)
Partnership tree farms	$	21.4	$	1.1	$	22.5	$	9.8	37
Funds' tree farms		13.2		-		13.2		1.5	24
Total Fee Timber September 30, 2011	$	34.6	$	1.1	$	35.7	$	11.3	61

Partnership tree farms	$	17.3	$	1.1	$	18.4	$	8.0	36
Funds' tree farms		3.1		0.3		3.4		-	6
Total Fee Timber September 30, 2010	$	20.4	$	1.4	$	21.8	$	8.0	42

Comparing YTD 2011 to YTD 2010. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, Fee Timber revenue, operating income, and harvest volume increased $13.9 million, $3.3 million, and 19 MMBF, respectively, over the comparable period in 2010. Log prices for the first nine months of 2011 were $81/MBF, or 17%, higher than the first nine months of 2010. This is primarily attributable to the rise of the export market that began in the fourth quarter of 2010 and continued through the first nine months of 2011, albeit with some softening later in the third quarter. The surge of the export market motivated us to harvest not only our planned annual volume but also a portion of deferred volumes that accumulated between 2008 and 2010 on both Partnership and Fund tree farms. Fund revenue and harvest volume increased four-fold during the first nine months of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. Year-to-date operating income for the Funds increased from $36,000 in 2010 to $1.5 million in 2011 on increased harvest volume from the Funds. The increase in Fund operating income was less dramatic than the increase in revenue would suggest because of the high depletion rates on Fund properties.

Log Volume

We harvested the following log volumes by species from the Combined tree farms for the quarters ended September 30, 2011, June 30, 2011, and September 30, 2010:

Volume (in MBF)		Quarter Ended
Sawlogs		Sep-11		% Total			Jun-11		% Total			Sep-10		% Total
	Douglas-fir		5,900		50	%		10,165		54	%		10,804		68	%
	Whitewood		2,644		22	%		5,092		27	%		1,527		9	%
	Cedar		236		2	%		280		1	%		175		1	%
	Hardwood		654		6	%		512		3	%		275		2	%
Pulpwood
	All Species		2,378		20	%		2,772		15	%		3,090		20	%
Total			11,812		100	%		18,821		100	%		15,871		100	%

Comparing Q3 2011 to Q2 2011. Harvest volumes declined 7 MMBF, or 37%, from the second to the third quarter of 2011 based on the decision to avoid competing with large seasonal volumes of wood entering the market. In concert with this seasonal supply surge, average log prices softened $27/MBF, or 5%, from the second to the third quarter.

Since the fourth quarter of 2010, export demand from China, which has remained largely indifferent to species, prompted us to shift to harvest units with a greater proportion of whitewood volume. However, a backlog of inventory in the China market led to some slack in export pricing during the third quarter. We responded by lowering harvest levels and diverting volume into domestic and pulpwood markets. This served to lower the percentage of Douglas-fir and whitewood sawlog harvest, while increasing pulpwood harvest during the quarter. During the third quarter of 2011, Douglas-fir comprised 64% of the 7 MMBF harvested from the Partnership’s tree farms, while whitewood comprised 8% of that total. On the other hand, the Funds’ third quarter 2011 harvest of 5 MMBF consisted of 30% Douglas-fir and 42% whitewood. The Douglas-fir component for Combined tree farms was 50% of the total harvest and whitewood 22% after blending the two disparate species mixes. Similarly, in the second quarter of 2011, Douglas-fir and whitewood harvest made up approximately 70% and 11%, respectively, of the 11 MMBF harvested from the Partnership’s tree farms while the Funds’ Douglas-fir and whitewood harvest components were 31% and 50%, respectively, of the 8 MMBF of Fund volume harvested. Blending these divergent species patterns yielded a Combined Q2 2011 harvest mix of 54% Douglas-fir and 27% whitewood. While emphasizing whitewood harvests would normally result in lower average log realizations, the strong demand from China and Korea that was largely indifferent as to species tempered this expected price-dampening effect. With log deliveries to sawmills curtailed due to continuing soft domestic lumber demand, the resulting shortage of sawmill residual chips continued to produce demand for chips from whole logs, thus driving up pulpwood prices. As a result, some harvest units heavy to pulpwood were targeted for third quarter harvest, thereby increasing pulpwood volumes to 20% of total third quarter 2011 harvest from 15% of total second quarter 2011 harvest.

Comparing Q3 2011 to Q3 2010. We deliberately decreased harvest volumes by 26% in the third quarter of 2011 from the third quarter of 2010, as noted above, due to an anticipated seasonal influx of log volume and softening export prices. By contrast, during the same period in 2010, we had increased harvest volumes to take advantage of nascent price surges in the export log market. In the third quarter of 2010, we harvested 4 MMBF from the Funds’ tree farms compared to 5 MMBF of Fund harvest in the third quarter of 2011. In the third quarter of 2011, 78% of the Combined whitewood harvest came from the Funds’ tree farms, which served to increase the whitewood mix from 9% in 2010 to 22% in 2011 and reduce the Douglas-fir mix from 68% in 2010 to 50% in 2011. Cedar and pulpwood volumes stayed constant from 2010 to 2011, while hardwood increased modestly by 2% to 6% of the log mix.

Comparing YTD 2011 to YTD 2010. We harvested the following log volumes by species from the Combined tree farms for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010:

Volume (in MBF):		Nine Months Ended
Sawlogs		Sep-11		% Total			Sep-10		% Total
	Douglas-fir		35,155		58	%		30,561		73	%
	Whitewood		14,212		23	%		3,337		8	%
	Cedar		1,035		2	%		451		1	%
	Hardwood		1,844		3	%		582		1	%
Pulpwood
	All Species		8,701		14	%		6,989		17	%
Total			60,947		100	%		41,920		100	%

Harvest volumes increased 45% in the first nine months of 2011 over the same period in 2010, with nearly all of this increase attributable to a boost in Fund harvest. To take advantage of the very favorable pricing in 2011, large amounts of deferred volume were taken from the Funds’ tree farms in the third quarter, resulting in harvest volume increasing from 6 MMBF in 2010 to 24 MMBF in 2011. This served to increase the mix of timber coming from the Funds’ tree farms to 40% in 2011 from 15% in 2010. As described above, the twin decisions to accelerate harvest from both the Partnership’s and Funds’ tree farms came in response to demand from China that took hold during late 2010 and continued through the first nine months of 2011. The shift in year-to-date Combined species mix that saw whitewood volume increase from 8% in 2010 to 23% in 2011, at the expense of Douglas-fir volumes which declined to 58% in 2011 from 73% in 2010, can be attributed to the incremental China export demand, which is largely indifferent to species mix. This species indifference played well into boosting Fund harvest volumes, of which the inventory has a heavier whitewood component. Our cedar and hardwood volumes are minor components of the overall mix and they stayed relatively consistent year over year, while pulpwood saw a slight decline from 2010 to 2011, even as pulpwood prices rose 25% from 2010 to 2011.

Log Prices

Logs from the Combined tree farms serve a number of different domestic and export markets, with domestic mills having historically represented our largest market segment. During the fourth quarter of 2010 and through the first nine months of 2011, however logs destined for export markets represented the largest share of our total log sales, as the China market accepted lower quality than what has traditionally defined an export log. As a result, virtually all of what used to be sold to domestic mills instead flowed to the China market during this period. Beginning in the middle of 2010 and through the middle of the third quarter of 2011, the relative strength of the China export market has been a driving force for much of our log pricing. In contrast to the Japan export market that has historically consisted of the top end of the quality spectrum with a particular preference for Douglas-fir, the China market not only accepts a log quality that is comparable to that which typically goes to the domestic market but is also relatively indifferent as to softwood species. We realized the following log prices by species for the quarters ended September 30, 2011, June 30, 2011, and September 30, 2010:

		Quarter Ended
		Sep-11		Jun-11		Sep-10
Average price
Sawlogs
	Douglas-fir	$	597	$	640	$	549
	Whitewood		562		557		439
	Cedar		924		921		1,045
	Hardwood		622		556		487
Pulpwood
	All Species		385		387		296
Overall			555		582		493

The following table compares the dollar and percentage change in log prices from each of the second quarter of 2011 and third quarter 2010 to the third quarter of 2011:

		Change to September 2011
		Jun-11						Sep-10
		$/MBF			%			$/MBF			%
Sawlogs	Douglas-fir	$	(43	)		-7	%	$	48			9	%
	Whitewood		5			1	%		123			28	%
	Cedar		3			0	%		(121	)		-12	%
	Hardwood		66			12	%		135			28	%
Pulpwood	All Species		(2	)		-1	%		89			30	%
Overall			(27	)		-5	%		62			13	%

The overall log price realized in the third quarter of 2011 declined by $27/MBF, or 5%, from the second quarter of 2011 due to a slightly lower mix of Douglas-fir, which fell from 54% of the total harvest volume in the second quarter to 50% in the third quarter and an increase in pulpwood from 15% of total second quarter harvest volume to 20% of third quarter harvest volume. Notwithstanding a slight decrease in pulpwood price from the second to the third quarter of 2011, pulpwood markets maintained their demand in concert with a shortage of residual chips available from domestic sawmills. Overall log prices increased $62/MBF, or 13%, from the third quarter of 2010 to the third quarter of 2011 in the face of an even more dramatic change in the species mix, which saw Douglas-fir fall from 68% of the total harvest volume in the third quarter of 2010 to 50% in 2011. The main driver behind this overall price increase was the performance of the export market and whitewoods, where log prices increased $65/MBF and $123/MBF, respectively, between the third quarter of 2010 and 2011.

The following table compares the dollar and percentage change in log prices between the first nine months of 2011 and the first nine months of 2010:

		Nine Months Ended
		Sep-11							Sep-10
				∆ from Sep-11 to Sep-10
				$/MBF		%
Sawlogs	Douglas-fir	$	612	$	85		16	%	$	527
	Whitewood		549		103		23	%		446
	Cedar		965		29		3	%		936
	Hardwood		558		63		13	%		495
Pulpwood	All Species		376		74		25	%		302
Overall			568		81		17	%		487

The 2011 nine-month average log price increased $81/MBF, or 17%, over the 2010 nine-month average log price. This was based on $96/MBF, or 18%, year-over-year increase in export price in addition to a $103/MBF, or 23%, increase in whitewood prices, and a $74/MBF, or 25%, increase in pulpwood prices. We targeted some pulpwood stands during the quarter to take advantage of this slight uptick in price which was driven by short supplies of residual chips due to a decline in lumber produced from domestic sawmills.

Douglas-fir: Douglas-fir is noted for its structural characteristics that make it generally preferable to other softwoods and hardwoods for the production of construction grade lumber and plywood. Demand and price for Douglas-fir sawlogs has historically been very dependent upon the level of new home construction in the U.S. Douglas-fir log prices realized in 2011 reflect some softening of this direct link between Douglas-fir sawlog prices and domestic housing starts with a dramatic increase in demand from China for various species of softwood sawlogs sourced from the Pacific Northwest. As a result, we believe Douglas-fir log demand will vary much more directly with U.S. and Canadian housing construction than might our other species.

Single-family home starts continue to languish today at levels below 500,000 starts annually, compared to approximately 1.7 million at its peak in 2005. In the absence of strong export market demand, this collapse in U.S. housing starts would have resulted in a significantly larger decline in log prices. There has been some softening in the export market to China which served to reduce the average price realized on Douglas-fir logs by $43/MBF, or 7%, in the current quarter compared to the second quarter of 2011. However, the realized price increased $48/MBF, or 9%, from the third quarter of 2010 to the third quarter of 2011 with the surge in 2011’s export market. Douglas-fir prices increased $85/MBF, or 16%, for the first nine months of 2011 when compared to the first nine months of 2010, again due primarily to strong export markets.

Whitewood: “Whitewood” is a term used to describe several softwood species, but for us primarily refers to western hemlock. Though generally considered to be of a lower quality than Douglas-fir, these logs are also used for manufacturing construction grade lumber. Historically, there has been a modest export market for whitewood logs, with most of this volume going to Korea. This changed during 2010 and continued through 2011, as the China market sustained its appetite for softwood logs, with little apparent regard or discrimination as to species. To the extent we were able to access whitewood stands, we harvested this species preferentially to take advantage of its higher relative price lift resulting from surging export demand. This strategy benefitted the Funds’ tree farms more than the Partnership tree farms because the former contain a higher proportion of whitewood and the Partnership’s whitewood stands tend to be at higher elevations and not easily accessible during winter. Whitewood prices remained flat in the third quarter of 2011, increasing $5/MBF, or 1%, over the second quarter of 2011 as a result of continued demand in the export markets. Whitewood prices were $123/MBF, or 28%, higher in the third quarter of 2011 compared to the third quarter of 2010 for these same reasons. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, whitewood prices increased $103/MBF, or 23%, from the same period in 2010 due to the export demand for this species.

Cedar: Cedar is a minor component in most upland timber stands and is generally used for outdoor applications such as fencing, siding and decking. Although there is a link between demand for these products and housing starts, this link is not as strong as with most other softwood species. Cedar prices remained flat, increasing $3/MBF from Q2 2011 to Q3 2011, and decreased $121/MBF, or 12% from Q3 2010 to Q3 2011 as a result of lower seasonal demand. However, on a year-to-date basis, cedar prices increased $29/MBF, or 3%, from 2010 to 2011.

Hardwood: “Hardwood” can refer to many different species, but on our tree farms primarily consists of red alder. The local mills that process red alder sawlogs are using the resource to manufacture lumber for use in furniture and cabinet construction. Hardwood prices increased $66/MBF, or 12%, from the second quarter of 2011 to the third quarter of 2011, and increased $135/MBF, or 28%, from the third quarter of 2010. Hardwood prices increased $63/MBF, or 13%, from the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to the same period in 2011, due chiefly to supply shortages that began earlier in 2011 and continued through the third quarter of 2011.

Pulpwood: Pulpwood is a lower quality log of any species that is manufactured into wood chips. These chips are used primarily to make a full range of pulp and paper products from unbleached linerboard (used in paper bags and cardboard boxes) to fine paper and specialty products. The pulpwood market has enjoyed relative strength in recent years as a direct result of sawmills taking significant downtime in response to the slowdown in housing starts. Sawmills typically provide the bulk of the chips used by pulp manufacturers, so curtailed sawmill production helped to push up the price of pulpwood logs sold directly to pulp mills as a primary alternative raw material source. For the quarter ended September 30, 2011, pulpwood prices were off $2/MBF, or 1%, over the second quarter of 2011 and up $89/MBF, or 30%, over the same period in 2010. During the first nine months of 2011, pulpwood prices increased $74/MBF, or 25%, when compared to the first nine months of 2010.

Customers

The export market for logs in the Pacific Northwest has been migrating over the last couple of years from a market highly focused on Japan to a market that includes more volume to China and Korea. During the third quarter of 2010, China eclipsed Japan as the largest export log destination from the Pacific Northwest. The Japan market historically required a higher quality log relative to the domestic U.S. market, and was willing to pay a premium for such logs. Under this historical pattern, domestic U.S. sawmills and export customers in Japan had complementary segments of the market. Due to the lower valued end-uses of products manufactured in China and Korea, including concrete forms and pallets, these log markets tend to seek the full complement of domestic and export sorts, as well as a broader range of species such as whitewoods, from the Pacific Northwest. The resultant lower average sawlog quality and more diverse species mix flowing to China and Korea has resulted in a narrowing of the export premium received for sales of logs into these markets relative to the domestic market. Combined with a higher absolute demand for export logs, this new and broadened source of demand for sawlogs in the Pacific Northwest is expected to continue to exert pricing pressure on domestic mills that have been competing with these offshore sources of demand for Pacific Northwest sawlogs. These new outlets for lower quality logs have helped to diversify our customer mix away from domestic mills that are more heavily dependent on the U.S. housing market.

The ultimate decision on where to sell logs is based on the net proceeds we receive after considering the quoted delivered log prices from a prospective customer and the hauling cost needed to get logs to that customer. In instances where harvest operations are in close proximity to a mill relative to the export yard of a broker, we will take advantage of favorable haul costs over selling to an export customer whose yard may be a greater distance from a harvest unit. The higher net delivered log value earned by selling to the domestic mill will, in such instances, result in sales of logs originally intended for Asia being diverted to domestic markets. As such, delivered log price movements can be influenced by marketing decisions predicated on a net return rather than merely focusing on the quoted per MBF log price.

The table below categorizes timber sold by customer type for the quarters ended September 30, 2011, June 30, 2011, and September 30, 2010:

	Q3 2011							Q2 2011							Q3 2010
	Volume							Volume							Volume
Destination	MBF		%			Price		MBF		%			Price		MBF		%			Price
Export brokers		4,897		42	%	$	614		10,834		58	%	$	645		4,646		29	%	$	549
Domestic mills		4,537		38	%		579		5,215		28	%		556		8,135		51	%		536
Pulpwood		2,378		20	%		385		2,772		14	%		387		3,090		20	%		296
Total		11,812		100	%	$	555		18,821		100	%	$	582		15,871		100	%	$	493

Comparing Q3 2011 to Q2 2011. Volume sold to the export market declined to 42% of total volume in Q3 2011 compared to 58% of total volume in Q2 2011 with an attendant drop in prices paid by export brokers of $31/MBF, or 5%. This reflects a backlog of log inventory in China and, as such, a decline in fervor for wood on the part of export brokers. Volume sold to domestic mills increased to 38% of total volume for Q3 2011 from 28% in Q2 2011 and prices paid by domestic mills rose by $23/MBF, or 4%, as mills attempted to capture log inventory to meet domestic and overseas lumber demand. The narrowing of the gap between export and domestic prices also led to some logs being sold to domestic mills when the difference in haul cost resulted in higher net return from the domestic mill despite having a lower sales price. Pulpwood volumes increased to 20% of the total third quarter volume compared to 14% of the second quarter volume due to increased demand for pulpwood logs in lieu of residual sawmill chips that have been in short supply. Pulpwood prices remained flat, dropping slightly by $2/MBF from the second to the third quarter, reflecting pulpwood with a higher mix of whitewood during the third quarter, which translates to a lower price.

Comparing Q3 2011 to Q3 2010. Volume sold to export brokers as a percentage of total harvest increased to 42% in Q3 2011 from 29% for the comparable period in the prior year, along with a $65/MBF, or 12%, increase in prices paid by export brokers. In contrast, volumes sold to domestic mills declined to 38% of total sales in the third quarter of 2011 compared to 51% of third quarter 2010’s total, although prices paid by domestic mills increased by $43/MBF, or 8%. These price increases and volume swings reflect continued demand from the export markets which served to put pressure on domestic mills fighting for the same quality log sought by the export markets. Overall average log price increased $62/MBF, or 13%, in the third quarter of 2011 from the third quarter of 2010 as a result of responding to the 2011 surge in demand from the China export market.

The table below categorizes timber sold by customer type for the year-to-date periods ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010:

	Nine Months Ended
	30-Sep-11							30-Sep-10
	Volume							Volume
Destination	MBF		%			Price		MBF		%			Price
Export brokers		32,135		53	%	$	625		12,341		29	%	$	529
Domestic mills		20,111		33	%		560		22,590		54	%		521
Pulpwood		8,701		14	%		376		6,989		17	%		302
Total		60,947		100	%	$	568		41,920		100	%	$	487

Comparing YTD 2011 to YTD 2010. Export brokers purchased 53% of total year-to-date volume compared with 29% during the same period in 2010. In addition, export brokers increased the price they paid by $96/MBF, or 18%, on a year-over-year basis. Nearly all of this increase in volume came at the expense of the domestic mills, which purchased 33% in 2011 compared to 54% in 2010. Notwithstanding the loss in total volume purchased, domestic mills increased prices paid by $39/MBF, or 7%, in an effort to compete with export brokers for logs being sold to the export market. Pulpwood buyers saw a slight decline in logs sold for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010, notwithstanding a $74/MBF, or 25% price increase during the same period. This price increase reflects higher pulp mill demand for whole log chips resulting from sawmill production curtailments.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales for the Fee Timber segment consists of harvest and haul costs and depletion expense. Harvest, haul, and depletion expenses all vary directly with actual harvest volume. Harvest costs will vary by terrain, with steeper slopes requiring more expensive cable systems with a high labor component, while more moderate slopes can be harvested with mechanized equipment and lower relative labor costs. Harvest and haul costs represent the direct cost incurred to convert trees into logs and deliver those logs to the point of sale. Depletion expense represents the cost of acquiring or growing the harvested timber. The applicable depletion rate is derived by dividing the aggregate cost of timber, together with capitalized road expenditures, by the estimated volume of merchantable timber available for harvest at the beginning of that year. The depletion rate is applied to the volume harvested in a given period to calculate depletion expense for that period. Readers should note that, because of the relatively recent acquisition dates, and thus relatively higher acquisition costs, of the Funds’ tree farms, the depletion rates associated with harvests from those properties is considerably higher than for harvests from the Partnership’s tree farms.

Fee Timber cost of sales for the quarters ended September 30, 2011, June 30, 2011, and September 30, 2010, respectively, is as follows, with the first table expressing these costs in total dollars and the second table expressing the costs on a per unit of production basis:

(Millions) Quarter Ended	Harvest, Haul and Other		Depletion		Total Cost of Sales		Harvest Volume (MMBF)
September 30, 2011	$	2.8	$	1.6	$	4.4		12
June 30, 2011		4.1		2.6		6.7		19
September 30, 2010		2.9		1.7		4.6		16

(amounts per MBF) Quarter Ended	Harvest, Haul and Other		Depletion		Total Cost of Sales
September 30, 2011	$	236	$	133	$	369
June 30, 2011		218		138		356
September 30, 2010		180		108		288

Comparing Q3 2011 to Q2 2011. Cost of sales declined by $2.3 million, or 35%, in the third quarter of 2011 relative to the second quarter of 2011. The decline is due to a decrease in harvest volume of 7 MMBF, or 37%, in response to a seasonal influx of logs into the market, although harvest costs increased as we had a higher proportion of harvest units requiring cable logging. Harvest, haul, and other costs increased $18/MBF during the third quarter of 2011 from the second quarter of 2011 as a result of an increase in harvest from units requiring more expensive cable logging methods, as well as a slight increase in timber excise taxes. Depletion costs decreased slightly by $5/MBF in the third quarter which reflects a shift in harvest between tree farms within the Funds’ tree farms during Q3 compared to Q2.

Comparing Q3 2011 to Q3 2010. Cost of sales decreased $195,000, or 4%, in the third quarter of 2011 versus the comparable period in 2010 as a result of a 4 MMBF, or 25%, decrease in harvest volume more than offset by a $56/MBF increase in harvest, haul, and other costs in the current quarter when compared to the same period in 2010. The higher per unit cost results from the harvest of stands requiring more costly logging methods and longer haul distances. In addition, depletion costs increased $25/MBF in the third quarter of 2011 relative to the third quarter of 2010 due to harvest from the Funds’ tree farms increasing from 4 MMBF in 2010 to 5 MMBF in 2011, which represented 41% of third quarter 2011 harvest compared with 23% of third quarter 2010 harvest volume. Depletion rates for the Funds’ tree farms are higher than depletion rates for the Partnership’s tree farms because the former were purchased more recently and thus at a higher acquisition cost than the latter.

Fee Timber cost of sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010, respectively, is as follows, with the first table expressing these costs in total dollars and the second table expressing the costs on a per unit of production basis:

(Millions) Nine Months Ended	Harvest, Haul and Other		Depletion		Total Cost of Sales		Harvest Volume (MMBF)
September 30, 2011	$	12.5	$	7.5	$	20.0		61
September 30, 2010		7.1		3.9		11.0		42

(amounts per MBF) Nine Months Ended	Harvest, Haul and Other		Depletion		Total Cost of Sales
September 30, 2011	$	204	$	123	$	327
September 30, 2010		169		93		262

Comparing YTD 2011 to YTD 2010. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, cost of sales increased $9.0 million, or 81%, versus the comparable period in 2010 as a result of a 19 MMBF, or 45%, increase in harvest volume as well as higher harvest, haul, and depletion costs. Harvest, haul and other costs increased $35/MBF, or 21%, in 2011 compared to 2010 which reflects costs incurred to harvest more units requiring cable logging and longer distances to customers. Cable logging generally occurs predominantly on higher-elevation timberlands and therefore more frequently in summer months. Cable logging costs were affected by a shortage of contractors in the wake of the industry-wide slowdown of 2008-2010 in which many contractors went out of business. In 2011 the high export log prices saw an increase in harvest in the industry that exceeded the contractor capacity, allowing contractors to demand relatively higher prices for their services. During the same period many log trucks were converted by their owners to highway freight hauling configuration, creating a shortage of log trucks and thus slightly higher haul costs. Depletion saw a $30/MBF, or 32%, increase during the first nine months of 2011 compared to the first nine months of 2010. This is attributable to a significant increase in the relative harvest from the Funds’ tree farms from 2010 to 2011 such that the Funds’ share of the Combined harvest total was 40% in 2011 compared to 15% in 2010.

Depletion expense for the quarters ended September 30, 2011, June 30, 2011, and September 30, 2010 was calculated as follows:

	Quarter Ended September 30, 2011
	Partnership				Funds				Combined
Volume harvested (MBF)		6,928	59	%		4,884	41	%		11,812
Rate/MBF	$	63			$	233			$	133
Depletion expense (Thousands)	$	434			$	1,137			$	1,571

	Quarter Ended June 30, 2011
	Partnership				Funds				Combined
Volume harvested (MBF)		11,065	59	%		7,756	41	%		18,821
Rate/MBF	$	63			$	247			$	138
Depletion expense (Thousands)	$	692			$	1,913			$	2,605

	Quarter Ended September 30, 2010
	Partnership				Funds				Combined
Volume harvested (MBF)		12,226	77	%		3,645	23	%		15,871
Rate/MBF	$	62			$	263			$	108
Depletion expense (Thousands)	$	763			$	957			$	1,720

When the percentage of harvest from the Funds’ tree farms increases, as it did from the third quarter of 2010 compared to the third quarter of 2011, the Combined depletion rate rises also to reflect the Funds’ more pronounced harvest weighting. Variable depletion expenses for the Funds reflect shifts in harvest between tree farms within the Funds’ tree farms between the different quarters.

Depletion expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 was calculated as follows:

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
	Partnership				Funds				Combined
Volume harvested (MBF)		36,789	60	%		24,158	40	%		60,947
Rate/MBF	$	63			$	214			$	123
Depletion expense (Thousands)	$	2,301			$	5,167			$	7,468

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
	Partnership				Funds				Combined
Volume harvested (MBF)		35,472	85	%		6,448	15	%		41,920
Rate/MBF	$	62			$	263			$	93
Depletion expense (Thousands)	$	2,215			$	1,694			$	3,909

Partnership depletion consists primarily of historical timber cost that has been owned by the Partnership for many decades, as well as the Columbia tree farm property that was acquired in 2001. As relatively newer acquisitions when compared to the Partnership tree farms, the Funds’ tree farms carry a higher depletion rate than our depletion pool for the Partnership tree farms. The increase in first nine months of 2011 Combined depletion rate over the same period in 2010 reflects the increase in harvest from the Funds to 40% in 2011 compared to 15% in 2010.

Operating Expenses

Fee Timber operating expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 were $1.7 million compared to $1.3 million and $1.0 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2011, and September 30, 2010, respectively. Operating expenses include management, silviculture and the cost of both maintaining existing roads and building temporary roads required for harvest activities for the 114,000 acres owned by the Partnership and the 61,000 acres owned by the Funds. The increase in operating expense in the third quarter of 2011 over the second quarter of 2011 and the third quarter of 2010 is due to an increase in road building and maintenance during the third quarter to support both current and future harvest operations. Roads are typically built one year in advance of harvest. However, it was necessary to build some roads concurrently with third quarter harvesting on a portion of the newly acquired Funds’ tree farms. Combined road maintenance costs for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 were $743,000, or 44%, of Combined operating expenses compared to $517,000, or 40%, and $330,000, or 33%, of Combined operating expenses for the quarters ended June 30, 2011, and September 30, 2010, respectively. Operating expenses for the Fee Timber segment for the first nine months of 2011 and 2010 were $4.5 million and $2.8 million, respectively. The increase in year-to-date expenses over the prior year is attributable to increased road building and maintenance costs to facilitate an increase in harvest levels and to prepare roads for future harvest on newly acquired Timber Fund lands. Combined road maintenance costs for 2011 were $1.8 million, or 40%, compared to 592,000, or 21%, of Combined operating expenses in 2010.

Timberland Management & Consulting

The Timberland Management & Consulting (TM&C) segment primarily develops timberland investment portfolios on behalf of the Funds. As of September 30, 2011, the TM&C segment managed two private equity timber funds representing $150 million of acquired commercial timberlands. Equity capital in these funds includes a co-investment by the Partnership of 20% of total fund equity capital with the remaining 80% coming from third-party investors.

Accounting guidance requires us to consolidate the Funds’ financial performance into our financial statements. As such, all fees associated with managing the Funds are eliminated in our consolidated financial statements. This creates challenges in how we illustrate the benefit we receive from the management fees generated in the TM&C segment. See Accounting Matters ~ Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates ~ Timber Fund Management Fees for more information on accounting for management fees paid by third-party investors.

Revenue and operating loss for the TM&C segment for the quarters ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:

(Thousands) Quarter Ended	Revenue		Operating loss
September 30, 2011	$	-	$	333
September 30, 2010		15		289

Comparing Q3 2011 to Q2 2011. TM&C had no revenue for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 after eliminating $488,000 of revenue earned from managing the funds. This compares to consulting revenue of $15,000 for the same period in 2010 after eliminating $397,000 of fund management revenue. The increase in revenue eliminated resulted from additional fees earned on the management of $58 million of timberland acquired by ORM Timber Fund II, Inc. at the end of the third quarter of 2010. Late in the third quarter of 2010, we acquired 25,000 acres of timberland on behalf of Fund II, which brought us to the current total of 61,000 acres we manage in two timber separate funds.

Operating losses generated by the TM&C segment for the quarters ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 totaled $333,000 and $289,000, respectively, after eliminating revenue earned from managing the funds as discussed above. The increase in operating losses is attributable to an increase in the cost of managing the Funds’ tree farms as a result of a 1 MMBF increase in harvest volume in the third quarter of 2011 over the prior period in 2010. In addition, higher personnel-related expenses were incurred in the third quarter of 2011 in connection with Fund oversight.

Revenue and operating loss for the TM&C segment for the year-to-date periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:

(Thousands) Nine Months Ended	Revenue		Operating loss
September 30, 2011	$	-	$	1,117
September 30, 2010		15		905

Comparing YTD 2011 to YTD 2010. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, TM&C had no revenue after eliminating Fund management fee revenue of $1.6 million and $987,000, respectively. The addition of property under management for Fund II in the fall of 2010 drove the increase in revenue eliminated for the nine-month period in 2011 over 2010. Operating losses for the first nine months of 2011 increased by $212,000 from $905,000 for the first nine months of 2010 to $1.1 million for the first nine months of 2011 as a result of costs incurred in connection with boosting Fund harvest levels, legal costs related to formation of a third timber fund, and higher personnel-related expenses associated with Fund oversight.

Real Estate

The Partnership’s Real Estate segment consists primarily of revenue from the sale of land within its 2,800-acre portfolio, sales of conservation easements and timberland tracts from the Partnership’s timberland portfolio, and residential and commercial property rents at the Port Gamble townsite. The Partnership’s Real Estate holdings are located primarily in the Washington counties of Pierce, Kitsap, and Jefferson Counties. Land sales include the sale of unimproved land which generally consists of larger acreage sales rather than single lot sales and are normally completed with very little capital investment prior to sale. Rural residential lot sales generally require some capital improvements such as zoning, road building, or utility access improvements prior to completing the sale. Commercial and residential plat land sales represent land sold after development rights have been obtained and are generally sold with certain infrastructure improvements.

Results from Real Estate operations are expected to vary significantly from year to year as we make multi-year investments in entitlements and infrastructure prior to selling entitled or developed land. Revenue and operating loss for the Real Estate segment for each of the third quarter 2011 and third quarter of 2010 are as follows:

(Thousands) Quarter Ended	Revenue		Operating loss
September 30, 2011	$	563	$	393
September 30, 2010		328		498

Real Estate revenue and gross margin detail for the quarters ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 is displayed in the table below:

(Thousands)
For the three months ended:							Revenue		Gross Margin
Description	Revenue		Gross margin		Acres Sold		per acre		per acre
Residential	$	110	$	78		3	$	36,667	$	26,000
Deferred revenue recognized
on Q2 residential land sale		50		1
Total land	$	160	$	79		3
Rentals		401		401
Other		2		2
September 30, 2011 Total	$	563	$	482

Rentals	$	319	$	319
Other		9		6
September 30, 2010 Total	$	328	$	325

Comparing Q3 2011 to Q3 2010. The Real Estate segment experienced a slight increase in activity during the third quarter of 2011, with one residential land closing and revenue recognition of $50,000 from a second quarter sale of a building in north Seattle. There were no land sales during the third quarter of 2010. Additional revenue earned by our real estate segment during the quarter of 2011 included commercial and residential rent, the primary revenue earned in the third quarter of 2010. The increase in rental revenue during the quarter is primarily attributable to revenue earned on a commercial office building acquired in May 2011.

Management intends to offer rural residential lots to the market as demand for raw land increases. In normal markets we target 150 to 300 acres of rural residential lot sales annually. The market for these types of land sales has been extremely weak thus far in 2011 and is not expected to improve over the balance of the year. As a result, we will not meet this target in 2011.

Revenue and operating loss for the Real Estate segment for each of the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:

(Thousands) Nine Months Ended	Revenue		Operating income (loss)
September 30, 2011	$	3,708	$	414
September 30, 2010	$	808	$	(2,120	)

Real Estate revenue and gross margin detail for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 is displayed in the table below:

(Thousands)
For the nine months ended:	Thousands						Revenue		Gross Margin
Description	Revenue		Gross margin		Acres sold		per acre		per acre
Conservation sale	$	1,955	$	1,715		386	$	5,065	$	4,443
Unimproved land		375		314		91		4,121		3,451
Residential		484		361		5		96,800		72,200
Total land	$	2,814	$	2,390		482		5,838		4,959
Rentals		882		881
Other		12		12
September 30, 2011 Total	$	3,708	$	3,283

Rentals	$	767	$	767
Other		41		35
September 30, 2010 Total	$	808	$	802

Comparing YTD 2011 to YTD 2010. Real Estate activity for the first nine months of 2011 included a conservation sale to The Nature Conservancy, three unimproved land sales, the sale of a building on two acres we owned in north Seattle, and one residential lot in Kitsap County. Rental revenue included commercial and residential rents that were augmented by the addition of a commercial tenant in the new Poulsbo building we purchased in May 2011. The foregoing activity compared favorably to the first nine months of 2010 where we did not have any land sales.

Cost of Sales

Real Estate cost of sales for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2011 included costs incurred in connection with the conservation sale and other land sales during the quarter. Cost of sales for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010 were de minimis.

Operating Expenses

Real Estate operating expenses, excluding $2,000 in environmental remediation charges, were $873,000 for the third quarter of 2011. Real Estate operating expenses during the same period in 2010, excluding $5,000 in environmental remediation charges, were $818,000. The slight increase in operating expenses from 2010 to 2011 is primarily attributable to an increase in maintenance expenses related to our residential and commercial properties which had been deferred in prior years. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, Real Estate operating expenses, excluding $346,000 in environmental remediation charges, were $2.5 million. For the first nine months of 2010, Real Estate operating expenses, excluding $568,000 in environmental remediation charges, were $2.4 million. This increase is primarily attributable to the residential and commercial property maintenance described above.

Basis in Real Estate Projects

“Land Held for Development” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet represents the Partnership’s cost basis in land that has been identified as having greater value as development property rather than as timberland. Our Real Estate segment personnel work with local officials to establish entitlements for further development of these parcels. We capitalize costs that are clearly associated with development or construction of fully entitled projects, whereas costs associated with projects that are in the entitlement phase are expensed. Those properties that are for sale, under contract, and the Partnership has an expectation they will sell within the next 12 months, are classified on our balance sheet as a current asset under “Building and Land Held for Sale”. The $1.1 million amount currently in Building and Land Held for Sale reflects our expectation of sales in early 2012 of the Partnership’s current headquarters building and a 10-acre multi-family parcel from the Harbor Hill project in Gig Harbor, Washington.

When facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of properties may be impaired, an evaluation of recoverability is performed by comparing the currently recorded carrying value of such property or properties to the projected future undiscounted cash flows of the same property or properties. If it is determined that the carrying value of such assets may not be fully recoverable, we would recognize an impairment loss, adjusting for changes in estimated fair market value, and would recognize an expense in this amount against current operations. We have continuously owned most of our land for decades. As a result, the land basis associated with most of our development properties is well below even the weakened current market values prevalent today. As such, we do not anticipate an asset impairment charge on our development projects.

Environmental Remediation

The Partnership has an accrual for estimated environmental remediation costs of $1.7 million as of September 30, 2011 and $1.9 million as of December 31, 2010. The environmental remediation liability represents estimated payments to be made to monitor and remedy certain areas in and around the millsite of Port Gamble, and at Port Ludlow, Washington.

The environmental liability at September 30, 2011 is comprised of $133,000 that the Partnership expects to expend in the next 12 months and $1.5 million thereafter. Statistical models have been used to estimate the liability and suggest a potential aggregate range of loss of $744,000 to $3.8 million.

During the third quarter, the DOE performed some additional sampling during the quarter that will inform modification of the RI/FS. The updated RI/FS is scheduled to be issued by the end of 2011, followed by the development of a clean-up action plan and consent decree.

During the third quarter of 2011, additional investigative work was performed to further refine the characterization and extent of the contamination in connection with a site located within the resort community of Port Ludlow. During the fourth quarter of 2011, we will continue monitoring the site with the intent to obtain data that point toward feasibility of remedies if and when appropriate.

Activity in the environmental remediation liability is detailed as follows:


	Balances at		Additions		Expenditures
	the Beginning		to		for		Balance at
(Thousands)	of the Period		Accrual		Remediation		Period-end
Year ended December 31, 2010	$	1,269	$	875	$	211	$	1,933
Quarter ended March 31, 2011		1,933		267		282		1,918
Quarter ended June 30, 2011		1,918		77		235		1,760
Quarter ended September 30, 2011		1,760		2		94		1,668

General and Administrative (G&A)

G&A expenses for the quarters ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were $950,000 and $1.0 million, respectively. This decrease in G&A expense in 2011 is due to development and adoption of a new incentive compensation plan first recorded in 2010 that required a catch-up accrual for multi-year performance cycles. G&A expenses for the first nine months of 2011 were $3.2 million compared to $3.4 for the first nine months of 2010; the decrease from the first nine months of 2010 is attributable to the catch-up accrual for the incentive compensation plan recorded in 2010.

Interest Income and Expense

Interest income for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 declined to $10,000 compared to $30,000 for the corresponding period of 2010. The decrease in interest income is due to lower cash balances and a decline in average interest rates earned on the portfolio. Interest income for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $32,000 and $91,000, respectively. The decline in interest expense is due primarily to the low cash balances we have been carrying in 2011 since taking a draw on the operating line of credit in December of 2010 to repurchase units.

Interest expense for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $559,000 and $493,000, respectively. This increase results from additional interest expense due to an increase in borrowings on the operating line of credit in 2011 over 2010 and interest expense from the Fund II timberland mortgage that closed in the fall of 2010. The Partnership’s debt consists primarily of mortgage debt with fixed interest rates and an operating line of credit that uses LIBOR with a spread that ranges from 225 to 325 basis points. Interest expense increased to $1.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 from $1.4 million from the comparable period in 2010. This is attributable to an increase in borrowings on the line of credit in 2011 and additional interest expense associated with the Fund II timberland mortgage.

For the quarter ended September 30, 2011, $108,000 of interest expense was capitalized. In the third quarter of 2010, we capitalized a combined $142,000 of interest expense. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, capitalized interest declined to $314,000 compared to $460,000 for the comparable period in 2010 due to the cessation of capitalized interest on projects considered substantially complete.

Income Tax

Pope Resources is a limited partnership and is therefore not subject to federal income tax. Taxable income/loss is instead reported to unitholders each year on a Form K-1 for inclusion in each unitholder’s tax return. Pope Resources does have corporate subsidiaries, however, that are subject to income tax liability.

The Partnership recorded tax expense of $19,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2011. For the third quarter of 2010, the Partnership recorded a $37,000 tax benefit. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we recorded tax expense of $158,000 compared with a tax benefit of $25,000 for the same period in 2010.

Noncontrolling interests-ORM Timber Funds

Noncontrolling interests-ORM Timber Funds represent that 80% portion of the Funds’ 2011 net income or loss which is attributable to third-party owners of the Funds. As such, in both 2010 and 2011, we added back 80% of the Funds’ losses.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements other than immaterial operating leases.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We ordinarily finance our business activities using funds from operations and, where appropriate in management’s assessment, commercial credit arrangements with banks or other financial institutions. Funds generated internally from operations and externally through financing are expected to provide the required resources for the Partnership's future capital expenditures for at least the next twelve months.

The Partnership’s debt agreements have covenants which are measured quarterly. Among the covenants measured, is a requirement that the Partnership not exceed a maximum debt-to-total-capitalization ratio of 30%, with total capitalization calculated using fair market (vs. carrying) value of timberland, roads and timber. The Partnership is in compliance with this covenant as of September 30, 2011 and expects to remain in compliance for at least the next twelve months. As such, all long-term debt agreements are appropriately classified on the balance sheet. The Partnership has a $20.0 million operating line of credit which had $6.5 million drawn as of September 30, 2011, down from $9.6 million at December 31, 2010.

Simultaneous with a timberland acquisition during the third quarter of 2010, Fund II closed on an $11 million timberland mortgage with MetLife Insurance Company. The mortgage is a non-amortizing 10-year loan with an interest rate of 4.85%. The agreement allows for, but does not require, annual principal payments of up to 10% without incurring a make-whole premium.

The $2.5 million decrease in cash used for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 to September 30, 2010 is due primarily to the following:

	Nine months ending			Nine months ending
(Thousands)	Sep-11			Sep-10			Change
Cash provided by operations	$	14,270		$	5,306		$	8,964
Investing activities
Redemption of investments		-			1,497			(1,497	)
Reforestation and roads		(886	)		(339	)		(547	)
Buildings and equipment		(3,548	)		(235	)		(3,313	)
Timberland acquisition		(140	)		(58,206	)		58,066
Cash used in investing activities		(4,574	)		(57,283	)		52,709
Financing activities
Repayment of line of credit and long-term debt		(3,087	)		(1,031	)		(2,056	)
Extinguishment of long-term debt		-			(18,554	)		18,554
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		-			31,000			(31,000	)
Debt issuance costs		-			(283	)		283
Cash distributions to unitholders		(3,727	)		(2,080	)		(1,647	)
Unit repurchases		-			(355	)		355
Cash from option exercises, net		516			573			(57	)
Excess tax benefit from equity-based compensation		-			104			(104	)
Payroll taxes paid upon restricted unit vesting		(226	)		-			(226	)
Cash distributions to fund investors, net of distributions to Partnership		(4,356	)		(8	)		(4,348	)
Capital call- ORM Timber Fund II, Inc.		-			38,800			(38,800	)
Proceeds from Fund II preferred share issuance		-			125			(125	)
Cash used in financing activities		(10,880	)		48,291			(59,171	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	(1,184	)	$	(3,686	)	$	2,502

Cash provided by operating activities was $14.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 versus $5.3 million for the corresponding period in 2010. The increase in cash provided by operating activities primarily results from a 19 MMBF increase in timber volume harvested in the first nine months of 2011 versus 2010’s comparable period, higher log prices in 2011, and $2.8 million in real estate sales that did not have a counterpart in 2010.

Cash used in investing activities was $4.6 million for the first nine months of 2011 versus $57.3 million for the corresponding period in 2010. The decrease in cash used in investing activities is primarily due to the acquisition of 25,000 acres of timber land for Fund II in the third quarter of 2010 that did not have a counterpart in 2011. ”Buildings and equipment” (including the aforementioned Poulsbo building) are detailed in the following table:

(Thousands)
For the nine months ended:	September 30, 2011
Poulsbo commercial office building		3,210
Port Gamble capital improvements		160
Vehicles and miscellaneous		178
Total capital expenditures	$	3,548

Cash used in financing activities was $10.9 million for the first nine months of 2011 compared to cash provided by financing activities of $48.3 million for the comparable period in prior year. This change is primarily attributable to the refinancing of one of the Partnership’s timber mortgages as well as the Fund II capital call and issuance of new mortgage debt for the $58 million acquisition by Fund II in 2010. In addition, we had an increase in distributions to Pope unitholders and distributions by the Funds to their investors in 2011 over 2010. Also contributing to the year-over-year increase is the partial pay down of the operating line of credit.

Seasonality

Fee Timber. The Partnership owns 114,000 acres of timberland in western Washington and the Funds own collectively 61,000 acres of timberland in western Washington and western Oregon. We are able to conduct year-round harvest activities on the 70,000-acre Hood Canal tree farm and 12,000 acres of the Funds’ properties because these properties are concentrated at low elevations. In contrast, the 44,000-acre Columbia tree farm and the remaining 49,000 acres of the Funds’ ownership are at a higher elevation where harvest activities are generally not possible during the winter months when snow precludes access to the lands. Generally, we concentrate our harvests from the Hood Canal tree farm in those months when weather limits operations on other properties, thus taking advantage of reduced competition for log supply to our customers and improving prices realized. As such, when these various tree farms are combined, we can operate so that the pattern of quarterly volumes harvested is flatter than would be the case if looking at one tree farm in isolation.

Timberland Management & Consulting. Management revenue generated by this segment is made up of asset and timberland management fees. These fees, which primarily relate to our activities on behalf of the Funds and are eliminated in consolidation, vary based upon the amount of capital managed, the number of acres managed, and the volume of timber harvested from properties owned by the Funds and are not expected to be significantly seasonal.

Real Estate. While Real Estate results are not expected to be seasonal, the nature of the activities in this segment will likely result in periodic large transactions that will have significant positive impacts on both revenue and operating income of the Partnership in periods in which these transactions close, and relatively limited revenue and income in other periods. While the variability of these results is not primarily a function of seasonal weather patterns, we do expect to see some seasonal fluctuations in this segment because of the general effects of weather on Pacific Northwest development activities.

Capital Expenditures and Commitments

Projected capital expenditures, including capitalized development expenditures, for the full year 2011 will approximate $5.8 million, including capitalized interest. Projected capital expenditures for the remainder of 2011 are $674,000, including capitalized interest, and are currently expected to include the following:

(Thousands)
For the period beginning October 1, 2011 and ending December 31, 2011:
Capitalized interest	$	119
Capitalized development expenditures		59
Total capitalized development expenditures		178
Reforestation and roads		484
		12
Total capital expenditures	$	674

These expenditures could be higher or lower as a result of future economic conditions. Projected capital expenditures are subject to permitting timetables and progress toward closing on specific land sale transactions.

ACCOUNTING MATTERS

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

An accounting policy is deemed to be “critical” if it is important to a company’s results of operations and financial condition, and requires significant judgment and estimates on the part of management in its application. The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain amounts reported in the financial statements and related disclosures. Actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions. Management believes its most critical accounting policies and estimates relate to the calculation of timber depletion as well as modeling performed to determine liabilities for matters such as environmental remediation, and potential asset impairments.

Timber Fund Management Fees

The Partnership’s wholly owned subsidiary, ORMLLC, earns management fees related to managing the funds. As a result, the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements, excluding the Funds, include 100% of these management fees as revenue. The stand-alone financial statements for the Funds include 100% of these management fees as expenses. The dollar amounts are the same, allowing for elimination of these two amounts in consolidation, and initially, no income impact in consolidation. However, each fund is 80% owned by third-party investors, and, as a result, 80% of these management fees are paid by these third-party investors. The 80% of management fees paid by third-party investors flows to the Partnership’s Statement of Operations under the caption “Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest-ORM Timber Funds,” effectively bringing the 80% of management fees back into consolidated income of the Partnership.

Total management fees of $488,000 and $397,000 were generated in the quarters ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Total management fees of $1.6 million and $987,000 were generated in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. To summarize the aforementioned consolidation process, these management fees were eliminated from revenue in the Partnership’s TM&C segment and from operating expenses in the Partnership’s Fee Timber segment. The 80% of management fees paid by third-party investors in the funds were added back to consolidated income in the Statement of Operations under the caption “Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests: ORM Timber Funds.”

For a further discussion of our critical accounting policies and estimates see Accounting Matters in the Management Discussion and Analysis section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Interest Rate Risk

The consolidated fixed-rate debt outstanding had a fair value of approximately $46.6 million and $41.9 million as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, based on the current interest rates for similar financial instruments. A change in the interest rate on fixed-rate debt will affect the fair value of the debt, whereas a change in the interest rate on variable-rate debt will affect interest expense and cash flows. A hypothetical 1% change in prevailing interest rates would change the fair value of the Partnership's fixed-rate long-term debt obligations by $2.7 million. We are not subject to material foreign currency risk, derivative risk, or similar uncertainties.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Partnership’s management maintains a system of internal controls, which management views as adequate to promote the timely identification and reporting of material, relevant information. Those controls include (1) requiring executive management and all managers in accounting roles to sign and adhere to a Code of Conduct and (2) implementation of a confidential hotline for employees to contact the Audit Committee directly with financial reporting concerns. Additionally, the Partnership’s senior management team meets regularly to discuss significant transactions and events affecting the Partnership’s operations. The Partnership’s President & Chief Executive Officer and Vice President & Chief Financial Officer (“Executive Officers”) lead these meetings and consider whether topics discussed represent information that should be disclosed under generally accepted accounting principles and the rules of the SEC. The Board of Directors of the Partnership’s general partner includes an Audit Committee. The Audit Committee reviews the earnings release and all reports on Form 10-Q and 10-K prior to their filing. The Audit Committee is responsible for hiring the Partnership’s external auditors and meets with those auditors at least eight times each year.

Our Executive Officers are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures. They have designed such controls to ensure that others make all material information known to them within the organization. Management regularly evaluates ways to improve internal controls.

As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q our Executive Officers completed an evaluation of the disclosure controls and procedures and have determined them to be effective. There have been no changes to internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II- OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, the Partnership may be subject to legal proceedings and claims that may have a material adverse impact on its business. Management is not aware of any current legal proceedings or claims that are expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse impact on its business, prospects, financial condition or results of operations.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Our business is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, any one or more of which could impact our operating results and financial condition materially and adversely. Some of these risks are discussed in greater detail below, arranged according to business segment. In addition, we face a number of risks that affect our business generally. We compete against much larger companies in each of our business segments. These larger competitors may have access to larger amounts of capital and significantly greater economies of scale. Land ownership carries with it the risk of incurring liabilities due to accidents that take place on the land and previously undiscovered environmental contamination. The Partnership endeavors to maintain adequate accruals to reflect the cost of remediating known environmental contamination and other liabilities resulting from land ownership. However these estimates may prove to be inadequate as additional information is discovered. A more thorough discussion of these and other risks and uncertainties that may affect our business is contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, and from time to time in our various other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Readers should review these risks in deciding whether to invest in Partnership units, and should recognize that those factors are not an exhaustive list of risks that could cause us to deviate from management’s plans or expectations. Readers also are cautioned that, in reviewing these risk factors, the factors contained in this report and in our other SEC filings are effective as of the date the filing was made, and we cannot undertake to update those disclosures.

Fee Timber

Fee Timber revenue is generated primarily through the sale of softwood logs directly to domestic sawmills and to third-party intermediaries who resell them to the export market. Over the past year, the export market has come to the fore as the primary outlet for our log sale program with the emergence of China, particularly, as an active acquirer of Pacific Northwest sawlogs. Until this past year, Japan had been the primary destination for sawlogs shipped from our region to Asia, even as we have seen log prices erode in the Japanese market in the face of competition from regions outside of the United States and emergent market acceptance in Japan for engineered wood products. These export markets for Pacific Northwest logs are significantly affected by fluctuations in United States, Japanese and, increasingly, Chinese and Korean economies, as well as by the foreign currency exchange rate between these Asian currencies and the U.S. dollar and ocean transportation costs, an issue that is particularly important in light of recent downgrades of the credit ratings for U.S. debt securities and increasing volatility in worldwide currency markets. On the other hand, the domestic market for logs in our operating area depends heavily on U.S. housing starts that are at depressed levels and this has reduced demand for lumber which in turn reduces demand for our sawlogs. To the extent the housing crisis continues or deepens the negative impacts on our operating results could continue.

Our ability to grow and harvest timber can be significantly impacted by legislation, regulations or court rulings that restrict or stop forest practices. For example, events that focus media attention upon natural disasters and damage to timberlands have at various times brought increasing public attention to forestry practices. Additional regulations, whether or not adopted in response to such events, may make it more difficult for us to harvest timber and may reduce the amount of harvestable timber on our properties. These and other restrictions on logging, planting, road building, fertilizing, managing competing vegetation, and other activities can significantly increase the cost or reduce available inventory thereby reducing income.

Timberland Management & Consulting

Management is working to expand our fee-for-service business through the expansion of the timber fund business, which represents the primary source of revenue within our Timberland Management & Consulting segment. To date we have acquired timberlands on behalf of the Funds, including full deployment of Fund I and Fund II. Unlike other components of our business, which relate solely or primarily to real estate and timber operations, this line of business carries risks relating to the offer and sale of securities, and to the management of investment operations. Among other risks, this line of business includes potential liability to investors if we are determined to have made material misstatements or omissions to those investors, potential accusations that we have breached fiduciary duties to other limited partners, and similar types of investor action. Moreover, litigation of shareholder-related matters can be expensive and time consuming, and if brought, would likely distract management from their focus on ordinary operating activities. Management plans to sponsor new funds in the future but success in this venture depends first on raising investment capital from third parties and then putting that committed capital to work by acquiring timberland properties at attractive prices that generate satisfactory future returns on that deployed capital. Failing to execute on either of these two fronts (capital raising or capital placement) will limit our ability to grow this segment’s business.

Real Estate

Similar to our Fee Timber business, real estate markets are keenly sensitive to the diminished housing market and regulatory risks. In a contracted housing market, such as the one we are currently experiencing, the demand for real estate declines with a resultant drop in sales. The value of our real estate investments is subject to changes in the economic and regulatory environment, as well as various land-use regulations and development risks, including the ability to obtain the necessary permits and zoning variances that would allow us to maximize our revenue from our real estate investments. Our real estate investments are long-term in nature, which raises the risk that unforeseen changes in the economy or laws surrounding development activities may have an adverse impact on our investments. Moreover, these investments often are highly illiquid and thus may not generate cash flow if and when needed to support our other operations.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

(a) – (e) None

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

(a)

None

(b)

There have been no material changes in the procedures for shareholders of the Partnership’s general partner to nominate directors to the board.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibits.

31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).

31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).

32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (furnished with this report in accordance with SEC Rel. No. 33-8238).

32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (furnished with this report in accordance with SEC Rel. No. 33-8238).

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on November 4, 2011.

	POPE RESOURCES,
	A Delaware Limited Partnership

	By:	POPE MGP, Inc.
		Managing General Partner


		By: /s/ David L. Nunes
		David L. Nunes
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)


		By: /s/ Thomas M. Ringo
		Thomas M. Ringo
		Vice President and CFO
		(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)

a50049025ex31-1.htm

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

		I, David L. Nunes, certify that:

1.		I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pope Resources;

2.		Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.		Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.		The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a–15(f) and 15d–15(f)) for the registrant and have:

	(a)		Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

	(b)		Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

	(c)		Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

	(d)		Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.		The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

	(a)		All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

	(b)		Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 4, 2011	/s/ David L. Nunes
	David L. Nunes
	Chief Executive Officer

a50049025ex31-2.htm

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

		I, Thomas M. Ringo, certify that:

1.		I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pope Resources;

2.		Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.		Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.		The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a–15(f) and 15d–15(f)) for the registrant and have:

	(a)		Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

	(b)		Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

	(c)		Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

	(d)		Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.		The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

	(a)		All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

	(b)		Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 4, 2011	/s/ Thomas M. Ringo
	Thomas M. Ringo
	Chief Financial Officer

a50049025ex32-1.htm

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pope Resources (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David L. Nunes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any of the Company’s filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise be deemed to be filed as part of the Report or under such Acts.

/s/ David L. Nunes
David L. Nunes

Chief Executive Officer

November 4, 2011

a50049025ex32-2.htm

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pope Resources (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas M. Ringo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

/s/ Thomas M. Ringo

Thomas M. Ringo

Chief Financial Officer

November 4, 2011