View:
Download DOC
Download PDF
Download XLS
Download XBRL
Document


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

Form 10-Q
 
( X )
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2018

OR
( )
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 1-9035

POPE RESOURCES, A DELAWARE
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
91-1313292
(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization) 
(IRS Employer
Identification Number)
 
19950 7th Avenue NE, Suite 200, Poulsbo, WA 98370
Telephone: (360) 697-6626
(Address of principal executive offices including zip code)
(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes x          No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).      Yes x         No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)
 
Large Accelerated Filer o
Accelerated Filer x
Emerging growth company o
 
Non-accelerated Filer o
Smaller Reporting Company o
 
                                                                                                           
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)    
Yes o          No x

Partnership units outstanding at July 31, 2018: 4,356,070




Pope Resources
Index to Form 10-Q Filing
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2018

Description
Page Number
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
Pope Resources, a Delaware Limited Partnership
June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017
(in thousands)
 
2018
 
2017
ASSETS
 
 
 
Current assets
 
 
 
Partnership cash
$
937

 
$
1,788

ORM Timber Funds cash
3,320

 
1,636

Cash
4,257

 
3,424

Restricted cash
1,026

 
1,860

Total cash and restricted cash
5,283

 
5,284

Accounts receivable, net
3,879

 
6,427

Contract assets
6,514

 
—

Land held for sale
10,734

 
5,728

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
1,401

 
591

    Total current assets
27,811

 
18,030

Properties and equipment, at cost
 

 
 

Timber and roads
362,311

 
267,662

Timberland
69,115

 
55,056

Land held for development
15,470

 
19,311

Buildings and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation (2018 - $7,989; 2017 - $7,833)
5,521

 
5,306

    Total property and equipment, at cost
452,417

 
347,335

Other assets
8,878

 
15,308

Total assets
$
489,106

 
$
380,673

 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES, PARTNERS’ CAPITAL AND NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS
 

 
 

Current liabilities
 

 
 

Accounts payable
$
1,313

 
$
2,430

Accrued liabilities
3,120

 
4,451

Current portion of long-term debt - Partnership
126

 
123

Deferred revenue
451

 
197

Current portion of environmental remediation liability
2,394

 
2,160

Other current liabilities
1,078

 
401

    Total current liabilities
8,482

 
9,762

Long-term debt, net of unamortized debt issuance costs and current portion - Partnership
89,796

 
70,037

Long-term debt, net of unamortized debt issuance costs - Funds
57,302

 
57,291

Environmental remediation and other long-term liabilities
4,712

 
2,957

Partners’ capital and noncontrolling interests
 

 
 

General partners' capital (units issued and outstanding 2018 - 60; 2017 - 60)
1,034

 
1,028

Limited partners' capital (units issued and outstanding 2018 - 4,258; 2017 - 4,251)
63,414

 
63,519

Noncontrolling interests
264,366

 
176,079

    Total partners’ capital and noncontrolling interests
328,814

 
240,626

Total liabilities, partners’ capital and noncontrolling interests
$
489,106

 
$
380,673

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (Unaudited)
Pope Resources, a Delaware Limited Partnership
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 and 2017
(in thousands, except per unit data)
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Revenue
$
27,912

 
$
15,891

 
$
52,899

 
$
33,236

Cost of sales
(14,575
)
 
(8,979
)
 
(26,875
)
 
(20,180
)
Operating expenses
(5,225
)
 
(4,514
)
 
(9,334
)
 
(8,776
)
Environmental remediation expense
(2,900
)
 
—

 
(2,900
)
 
—

General and administrative expenses
(1,403
)
 
(1,405
)
 
(3,024
)
 
(3,106
)
Gain on sale of timberland
—

 
—

 
—

 
12,503

Income from operations
3,809

 
993

 
10,766

 
13,677

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense, net
(1,248
)
 
(1,117
)
 
(2,392
)
 
(2,127
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) before income taxes
2,561

 
(124
)
 
8,374

 
11,550

Income tax expense
(29
)
 
(3
)
 
(127
)
 
(59
)
Net and comprehensive income (loss)
2,532

 
(127
)
 
8,247

 
11,491

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net and comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests - ORM Timber Funds
(2,391
)
 
285

 
(2,388
)
 
(7,963
)
Net and comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests - Real Estate
58

 
—

 
58

 
—

Net and comprehensive income attributable to unitholders    
$
199

 
$
158

 
$
5,917

 
$
3,528

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Allocable to general partners
$
3

 
$
2

 
$
82

 
$
49

Allocable to limited partners
196

 
156

 
5,835

 
3,479

Net and comprehensive income attributable to unitholders
$
199

 
$
158

 
$
5,917

 
$
3,528

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic and diluted earnings per unit attributable to unitholders
$
0.04

 
$
0.03

 
$
1.35

 
$
0.80

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic and diluted weighted average units outstanding
4,320

 
4,327

 
4,320

 
4,326

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Distributions per unit
$
0.70

 
$
0.70

 
$
1.40

 
$
1.40

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS’ CAPITAL AND NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS (Unaudited)
Pope Resources, a Delaware Limited Partnership
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
(in thousands, except unit amounts)

 
 
 
Attributable to Pope Resources
 
 
 
 
 
Units
 
General Partners
 
Limited Partners
 
Noncontrolling Interests
 
Total
December 31, 2017
4,311,065

 
$
1,028

 
$
63,519

 
$
176,079

 
$
240,626

Net income
—

 
82

 
5,835

 
2,330

 
8,247

Cash distributions
—

 
(85
)
 
(6,018
)
 
(6,323
)
 
(12,426
)
Capital call
—

 
—

 
—

 
92,280

 
92,280

Equity-based compensation
15,781

 
10

 
712

 
—

 
722

Units issued under distribution reinvestment plan
1,687

 
—

 
120

 
—

 
120

Unit repurchases
(9,116
)
 
—

 
(653
)
 
—

 
(653
)
Payroll taxes paid on unit net settlements
(1,466
)
 
(1
)
 
(101
)
 
—

 
(102
)
June 30, 2018
4,317,951

 
$
1,034

 
$
63,414

 
$
264,366

 
$
328,814


See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.


5


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
Pope Resources, a Delaware Limited Partnership
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands)
 
2018
 
2017
Net income
$
8,247

 
$
11,491

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
 

 
 

Depletion
14,141

 
8,485

Equity-based compensation
722

 
784

Depreciation and amortization
285

 
252

Deferred taxes and other
40

 
44

Cost of land sold
75

 
301

Gain on sale of timberland - Funds
—

 
(12,503
)
Gain on disposal of property and equipment
(4
)
 
(3
)
Cash flows from changes in operating accounts
 

 
 

Accounts receivable, net
2,547

 
936

Prepaid expenses, contract assets, and other assets
(6,966
)
 
5,356

Real estate project expenditures
(1,232
)
 
(4,294
)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
(2,447
)
 
(1,031
)
Deferred revenue
254

 
(47
)
Environmental remediation accruals
2,900

 
—

Environmental remediation payments
(885
)
 
(4,280
)
Other current and long-term liabilities
652

 
129

Net cash provided by operating activities
18,329

 
5,620

 
 
 
 
Cash flows from investing activities
 

 
 

Reforestation and roads
(1,861
)
 
(1,109
)
Capital expenditures
(462
)
 
(92
)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
4

 
30

Investment in unconsolidated real estate joint venture
(250
)
 
—

Acquisitions of timberland - Partnership
(6,355
)
 
(4,951
)
Acquisitions of timberland - Funds
(108,364
)
 
—

Proceeds from sale of timberland - Funds
—

 
26,444

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
(117,288
)
 
20,322

 
 
 
 
Cash flows from financing activities
 

 
 

Line of credit borrowings
24,300

 
18,507

Line of credit repayments
(4,500
)
 
(8,000
)
Repayment of long-term debt
(61
)
 
(5,059
)
Debt issuance costs
—

 
(77
)
Proceeds from unit issuances - distribution reinvestment plan
120

 
—

Unit repurchases
(653
)
 
(57
)
Payroll taxes paid on unit net settlements
(102
)
 
(94
)
Cash distributions to unitholders
(6,103
)
 
(6,115
)
Cash distributions - ORM Timber Funds, net of distributions to Partnership
(6,323
)
 
(23,937
)
Capital call - ORM Timber Funds, net of Partnership contribution
92,280

 
825

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
98,958

 
(24,007
)
 
 
 
 
Net increase in cash and restricted cash
(1
)
 
1,935

Cash and restricted cash at beginning of period
5,284

 
2,937

Cash and restricted cash at end of period
$
5,283

 
$
4,872

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

6


POPE RESOURCES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
June 30, 2018

1.
The condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2018, and December 31, 2017, and the related condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) for the three- and six-month periods, and partners’ capital and cash flows for the six-month periods, ended June 30, 2018, and 2017, have been prepared by Pope Resources, A Delaware Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”), pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited but, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments and accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the interim periods. The financial information as of December 31, 2017, is derived from the Partnership’s audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2017, and should be read in conjunction with such financial statements and notes. The results of operations for the interim periods are not indicative of the results of operations that may be achieved for the entire fiscal year ending December 31, 2018.

2.
The financial statements in the Partnership’s 2017 annual report on Form 10-K include a summary of significant accounting policies of the Partnership and should be read in conjunction with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, which requires substantially all leases to be reflected on the balance sheet as a liability and a right-of-use asset. The ASU will replace existing lease accounting guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective on January 1, 2019, and the Partnership will adopt it at that time. The standard will be applied on a modified retrospective basis in which certain optional practical expedients may be applied. Due to the Partnership’s limited leasing activity, management does not expect the effect of this standard to be material to its consolidated financial statements.

3.
Effective January 1, 2018, the Partnership adopted Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. For revenue from the Partnership Timber and Funds Timber segments, which consists primarily of the sale of logs, there were no changes to the timing or amount of revenue recognized because contracts are legally enforceable, the transaction price is fixed, and performance is completed and control transfers at a point in time, typically when risk of loss and title passes to the customer. Similarly, no changes were identified to the timing or amount of revenue recognized from certain components of other revenue in these segments, including commercial thinning, royalties from gravel mines and quarries, and land use permits. For timber deed sales, the timing of revenue recognition was accelerated under the new standard to the effective date of the contract, whereas under the previous revenue recognition guidance the revenue was generally recognized when the timber was harvested by the customer. Under Topic 606, revenue recognized from timber deed sales, in the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2018, was $7.5 million greater than it would have been under the previous revenue recognition accounting standards. For the Real Estate segment, this new standard may result in accelerating the recognition of revenue for performance obligations that are satisfied over time, which generally consist of construction and landscaping activity in common areas completed after transaction closing. The Partnership adopted this standard using the cumulative effect transition method applied to uncompleted contracts as of the date of adoption. The Partnership, however, had no uncompleted contracts at the date of adoption. Accordingly, the adoption of this standard did not have a cumulative effect on the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements.

Revenue is measured based on the consideration specified in a contract with a customer. The Partnership recognizes revenue when it satisfies a performance obligation by transferring control over a product or service to a customer. Taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are both imposed on and concurrent with a specific revenue-producing transaction, that are collected by the Partnership from a customer, are excluded from revenue. Shipping costs associated with delivering products to customers are included in cost of sales.

Included in “Accounts receivable, net” are $3.0 million and $4.4 million of receivables from contracts with customers as of June 30, 2018, and December 31, 2017, respectively. Significant changes in the contract asset balance during the period were as follows, and there were no contract liabilities as of June 30, 2018, and December 31, 2017:


7


Contract assets, January 1, 2018
$
—

Revenue recognized from the satisfaction of performance obligations
8,865

Transferred to receivables from contract assets
(2,351
)
Contract assets, June 30, 2018
$
6,514


The contract assets in the table above represent rights to consideration for timber deeds transferred to the customer, and are related to the Funds Timber segment. These contracts provide the customer the legal right to harvest timber on the Funds’ property. The value of a timber deed contract is determined based on the estimated timber volume by tree species multiplied by the contracted price. The contract consideration is considered variable because the timber volume is an estimate until the harvest is completed. The contract assets are transferred to receivables when the rights to consideration become unconditional, which occurs at harvest. Customers may harvest the timber at their discretion, within a time period and operational parameters stated in the contract.

The following is a description of principal activities, separated by reportable segments, from which the Partnership generates its revenue.

Partnership Timber and Funds Timber

Log sale revenue in these two segments is recognized when control is transferred and title and risk of loss passes to the buyer, which typically occurs when logs are delivered to the customer. Revenue in these two segments is earned primarily from the harvest and sale of logs from the Partnership’s and Funds’ timberland. Other revenue in these segments is generated from the sale of rights to harvest timber (timber deed sales), commercial thinning, ground leases for cellular communication towers, royalties from gravel mines and quarries, and land use permits. Timber deed sales are generally structured so that the customer pays a contracted price per volume, measured in thousands of board feet (MBF), and revenue is recognized when control is transferred to the customer, which generally occurs on the effective date of the contract. Commercial thinning consists of the selective cutting of timber stands that have not yet reached optimal harvest age. However, this timber does have some commercial value and revenue is based on the volume harvested. Royalty revenue from gravel mines and quarries is recognized monthly based on the quantity of material extracted.

The following table presents log sale and other revenue for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017:

(in thousands)
Quarter ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Partnership Timber
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Log sale revenue
$
5,039

 
$
7,710

 
$
19,674

 
$
16,387

Other revenue
531

 
459

 
1,034

 
888

Total revenue
$
5,570

 
$
8,169

 
$
20,708

 
$
17,275

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Funds Timber
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Log sale revenue
$
8,494

 
$
6,630

 
$
18,003

 
$
14,232

Timber deed sale revenue
8,865

 
638

 
8,865

 
710

Other revenue
558

 
5

 
590

 
37

Total revenue
$
17,917

 
$
7,273

 
$
27,458

 
$
14,979


Timberland Investment Management (TIM)

Fee revenue generated by the TIM segment for managing the Funds includes fixed components related to invested capital and acres under management, and a variable component related to harvest volume from the Funds’ tree farms. These fees, which represent an expense in the Funds Timber segment, are eliminated in consolidation. The TIM segment occasionally earns revenue from providing timberland management-related consulting services to third-parties and recognizes such revenue as the related services are provided.


8


Real Estate

The Real Estate segment’s activities consist of investing in and later selling improved properties, holding properties for later development and sale, and managing commercial properties. Revenue is generated primarily from sales of land, sales of development rights known as conservation easements (CE’s), sales of unimproved land from the Partnership’s timberland portfolio, and residential and commercial rents. Revenue on real estate sales is recorded on the date the sale closes. When a real estate transaction is closed with obligations to complete infrastructure or other construction, the portion of the total contract allocated to the post-closing obligations may be recognized over time as that work is performed, provided the customer either simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits as we perform under the contract, our performance creates or enhances the asset controlled by the customer, or we do not create an asset with an alternative use to the customer and we have an enforceable right to payment for the performance completed. Progress towards the satisfaction of our performance obligations is generally measured based on costs incurred relative to the total cost expected to be incurred for the performance obligations.

The following table breaks down revenue for the Real Estate segment for the quarters ended June 30, 2018 and 2017:

 
Quarter ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Development rights (CE)
$
3,730

 
$
—

 
$
3,730

 
$
—

Residential land sales
151

 
170

 
151

 
455

Unimproved land
125

 
—

 
125

 
—

Total land sales
4,006

 
170

 
4,006

 
455

Rentals and other
419

 
279

 
727

 
527

Total revenue
$
4,425

 
$
449

 
$
4,733

 
$
982


4.
The Partnership has two general partners: Pope MGP, Inc. and Pope EGP, Inc. In total, these two entities own 60,000 partnership units. The allocation of distributions, profits, and losses among the general and limited partners is pro rata across all units outstanding.

5.
ORM Timber Fund II, Inc. (Fund II), ORM Timber Fund III (REIT) Inc. (Fund III), and ORM Timber Fund IV LLC (Fund IV), collectively “the Funds”, were formed by Olympic Resource Management LLC (ORMLLC), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Partnership, for the purpose of raising capital to purchase timberlands. The objective of these Funds is to generate a return on investments through the acquisition, management, value enhancement, and sale of timberland properties. Each fund is organized to operate for a specific term from the end of its respective investment period; ten years for each of Fund II and Fund III, and fifteen years for Fund IV. Fund II and Fund III are scheduled to terminate in March 2021 and December 2025, respectively. Fund IV will terminate on the fifteenth anniversary of the end of its investment period, which will occur on the earlier of placement of all committed capital or December 31, 2019, subject to certain extension provisions.

Pope Resources and ORMLLC together own equity interests totaling 20% of Fund II, 5% of Fund III, and 15% of Fund IV. The Funds are considered variable interest entities because their organizational and governance structures are the functional equivalent of a limited partnership. As the managing member of the Funds, the Partnership is the primary beneficiary of each of the Funds as it has the authority to direct the activities that most significantly impact their economic performance, as well as the right to receive benefits and the obligation to absorb losses that could potentially be significant to the Funds. Accordingly, the Funds are consolidated into the Partnership’s financial statements. The obligations of each of the Funds are non-recourse to the Partnership.

In January 2018, Fund IV closed on the acquisitions of two tree farms, one in southwestern Oregon and one in south Puget Sound, Washington, for $33.6 million and $80.4 million, respectively. In 2017, Fund IV paid deposits totaling $5.7 million for these acquisitions. The Partnership’s share of the combined purchase price was $17.0 million. The combined purchase price was allocated $100.7 million to timber and roads, and $13.3 million to the underlying land.

In January 2017, Fund II closed on the sale of one of its tree farms, located on the Oregon coast, for $26.5 million. The Partnership’s share of the pretax results from this tree farm was a gain of $2.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017.

9



The assets and liabilities of the Funds as of June 30, 2018, and December 31, 2017, were as follows:
 
(in thousands)
June 30, 2018

December 31, 2017
Assets:
Cash
$
3,320

 
$
1,636

Other current assets
8,595

 
2,481

Total current assets
11,915

 
4,117

Properties and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
337,526

 
235,046

Other long-term assets
—

 
5,683

Total assets
$
349,441

 
$
244,846

Liabilities and equity:
 

 
 

Current liabilities
$
3,119

 
$
2,862

Long-term debt, net of unamortized debt issuance costs
57,302

 
57,291

Funds’ equity
289,020

 
184,693

Total liabilities and equity
$
349,441

 
$
244,846


6.
Other assets consisted of the following at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:

 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
 
 
 
 
Deferred tax assets, net
$
429

 
$
465

Cash held by like-kind exchange intermediaries
—

 
598

Deposits for acquisitions of timberland
—

 
5,688

Investment in Real Estate joint venture entity
6,142

 
5,895

Advances to Real Estate joint venture entity
506

 
37

Note receivable
1,801

 
2,625

Total
$
8,878

 
$
15,308


7.
In the presentation of the Partnership’s revenue and operating income (loss) by segment, all intersegment revenue and expense is eliminated to determine operating income (loss) reported externally. The following tables reconcile internally reported income (loss) from operations to externally reported income (loss) from operations by business segment.

Beginning with the first quarter of 2018, we measure segment performance based on Adjusted EBITDDA in addition to operating income. We define Adjusted EBITDDA as earnings, on an internal basis, before interest, taxes, depletion, depreciation, amortization, gain or loss on sales of timberland, and environmental remediation expense. The following tables reconcile internally reported operating income (loss) from operations to Adjusted EBITDDA.

In addition, we have changed our internal reporting and our segment reporting to segregate our former “Fee Timber” segment into two segments: “Partnership Timber” includes the operating results of the Partnership’s 100%-owned timberland while “Funds Timber” includes the operating results of our three private equity timber funds. Our chief operating decision maker reviews internal financial reporting information at the Partnership Timber and Funds Timber level to allocate resources and evaluate the results of the business. Prior period segment disclosures have been revised to reflect our current segment structure.

10


Quarter ended June 30, (in thousands)
Partnership Timber
 
Funds Timber
 
Timberland Investment Management
 
Real Estate
 
Other
 
Consolidated
2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenue - internal
$
5,693

 
$
17,917

 
$
1,140

 
$
4,542

 
$
—

 
$
29,292

Eliminations
(123
)
 
—

 
(1,140
)
 
(117
)
 
—

 
(1,380
)
Revenue - external
5,570

 
17,917

 
—

 
4,425

 
—

 
27,912

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cost of sales
(1,994
)
 
(11,870
)
 
—

 
(711
)
 
—

 
(14,575
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating, general and administrative expenses - internal
(1,837
)
 
(2,525
)
 
(1,055
)
 
(1,163
)
 
(1,428
)
 
(8,008
)
Eliminations
42

 
1,140

 
139

 
34

 
25

 
1,380

Operating, general and administrative expenses - external
(1,795
)
 
(1,385
)
 
(916
)
 
(1,129
)
 
(1,403
)
 
(6,628
)
Environmental remediation
—

 
—

 
—

 
(2,900
)
 
—

 
(2,900
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from operations - internal
1,862

 
3,522

 
85

 
(232
)
 
(1,428
)
 
3,809

Eliminations
(81
)
 
1,140

 
(1,001
)
 
(83
)
 
25

 
—

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from operations - external
$
1,781

 
$
4,662

 
$
(916
)
 
$
(315
)
 
$
(1,403
)
 
$
3,809

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from operations - internal
$
1,862

 
$
3,522

 
$
85

 
$
(232
)
 
$
(1,428
)
 
$
3,809

Depletion, depreciation, and amortization
511

 
8,947

 
17

 
68

 
11

 
9,554

Environmental remediation
—

 
—

 
—

 
2,900

 
—

 
2,900

Adjusted EBITDDA
$
2,373

 
$
12,469

 
$
102

 
$
2,736

 
$
(1,417
)
 
$
16,263

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2017
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Revenue - internal
$
8,253

 
$
7,273

 
$
817

 
$
549

 
$
—

 
$
16,892

Eliminations
(84
)
 
—

 
(817
)
 
(100
)
 
—

 
(1,001
)
Revenue - external
8,169

 
7,273

 
—

 
449

 
—

 
15,891

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cost of sales
(3,336
)
 
(5,190
)
 
—

 
(453
)
 
—

 
(8,979
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating, general and administrative expenses - internal
(1,466
)
 
(1,662
)
 
(852
)
 
(1,511
)
 
(1,429
)
 
(6,920
)
Eliminations
40

 
817

 
101

 
19

 
24

 
1,001

Operating, general and administrative expenses -external
(1,426
)
 
(845
)
 
(751
)
 
(1,492
)
 
(1,405
)
 
(5,919
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from operations - internal
3,451

 
421

 
(35
)
 
(1,415
)
 
(1,429
)
 
993

Eliminations
(44
)
 
817

 
(716
)
 
(81
)
 
24

 
—

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from operations - external
$
3,407

 
$
1,238

 
$
(751
)
 
$
(1,496
)
 
$
(1,405
)
 
$
993

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from operations - internal
$
3,451

 
$
421

 
$
(35
)
 
$
(1,415
)
 
$
(1,429
)
 
$
993

Depletion, depreciation, and amortization
942

 
2,655

 
8

 
70

 
13

 
3,688

Adjusted EBITDDA
$
4,393

 
$
3,076

 
$
(27
)
 
$
(1,345
)
 
$
(1,416
)
 
$
4,681



11


Six Months Ended June 30, (in thousands)
Partnership Timber
 
Funds Timber
 
Timberland Investment Management
 
Real Estate
 
Other
 
Consolidated
2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenue - internal
$
20,940

 
$
27,458

 
$
2,164

 
$
4,985

 
$
—

 
$
55,547

Eliminations
(232
)
 
—

 
(2,164
)
 
(252
)
 
—

 
(2,648
)
Revenue - external
20,708

 
27,458

 
—

 
4,733

 
—

 
52,899

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cost of sales
(7,020
)
 
(18,822
)
 
—

 
(1,033
)
 
—

 
(26,875
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating, general and administrative expenses - internal
(3,347
)
 
(4,331
)
 
(2,131
)
 
(2,118
)
 
(3,079
)
 
(15,006
)
Eliminations
92

 
2,164

 
268

 
69

 
55

 
2,648

Operating, general and administrative expenses - external
(3,255
)
 
(2,167
)
 
(1,863
)
 
(2,049
)
 
(3,024
)
 
(12,358
)
Environmental remediation
 
 
 
 
—

 
(2,900
)
 
 
 
(2,900
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from operations - internal
10,573

 
4,305

 
33

 
(1,066
)
 
(3,079
)
 
10,766

Eliminations
(140
)
 
2,164

 
(1,896
)
 
(183
)
 
55

 
—

Income (loss) from operations - external
$
10,433

 
$
6,469

 
$
(1,863
)
 
$
(1,249
)
 
$
(3,024
)
 
$
10,766

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from operations - internal
$
10,573

 
$
4,305

 
$
33

 
$
(1,066
)
 
$
(3,079
)
 
$
10,766

Depletion, depreciation, and amortization
1,836

 
12,369

 
27

 
136

 
25

 
14,393

Environmental remediation
—

 
—

 
—

 
2,900

 
—

 
2,900

Adjusted EBITDDA
$
12,409

 
$
16,674

 
$
60

 
$
1,970

 
$
(3,054
)
 
$
28,059

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2017
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Revenue - internal
$
17,444

 
$
14,979

 
$
1,665

 
$
1,216

 
$
—

 
$
35,304

Eliminations
(169
)
 
—

 
(1,665
)
 
(234
)
 
—

 
(2,068
)
Revenue - external
17,275

 
14,979

 
—

 
982

 
—

 
33,236

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cost of sales
(6,878
)
 
(12,283
)
 
—

 
(1,019
)
 
—

 
(20,180
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating, general and administrative expenses - internal
(2,710
)
 
(3,435
)
 
(1,925
)
 
(2,716
)
 
(3,164
)
 
(13,950
)
Eliminations
97

 
1,665

 
208

 
40

 
58

 
2,068

Operating, general and administrative expenses - external
(2,613
)
 
(1,770
)
 
(1,717
)
 
(2,676
)
 
(3,106
)
 
(11,882
)
Gain on sale of timberland
—

 
12,503

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
12,503

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from operations - internal
7,856

 
11,764

 
(260
)
 
(2,519
)
 
(3,164
)
 
13,677

Eliminations
(72
)
 
1,665

 
(1,457
)
 
(194
)
 
58

 
—

Income (loss) from operations - external
$
7,784

 
$
13,429

 
$
(1,717
)
 
$
(2,713
)
 
$
(3,106
)
 
$
13,677

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income (loss) from operations - internal
$
7,856

 
$
11,764

 
$
(260
)
 
$
(2,519
)
 
$
(3,164
)
 
$
13,677

Depletion, depreciation, and amortization
1,964

 
6,556

 
16

 
143

 
27

 
8,706

(Gain) loss on sale of timberland
—

 
(12,503
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(12,503
)
Adjusted EBITDDA
$
9,820

 
$
5,817

 
$
(244
)
 
$
(2,376
)
 
$
(3,137
)
 
$
9,880


12



8.
Basic and diluted earnings per unit are calculated by dividing net income attributable to unitholders, adjusted for non-forfeitable distributions paid out to unvested restricted unitholders and preferred shareholders of Fund II and Fund III, by the weighted average units outstanding during the period. There were no dilutive securities outstanding during the periods presented. The following table shows the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per unit:

 
Quarter Ended 
 June 30,
 
Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
(in thousands, except per unit amounts)
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Net and comprehensive income attributable to Pope Resources’ unitholders
$
199

 
$
158

 
$
5,917

 
$
3,528

Less:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Non-forfeitable distributions paid to unvested restricted unitholders
(27
)
 
(25
)
 
(53
)
 
(56
)
Preferred share dividends - ORM Timber Funds
(8
)
 
(8
)
 
(16
)
 
(16
)
Net and comprehensive income for calculation of earnings per unit
$
164

 
$
125

 
$
5,848

 
$
3,456

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic and diluted weighted average units outstanding
4,320

 
4,327

 
4,320

 
4,326

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic and diluted net earnings per unit
$
0.04

 
$
0.03

 
$
1.35

 
$
0.80


9.
In the first quarter of 2018, the Partnership issued 11,393 restricted units pursuant to the management incentive compensation program and 3,575 restricted units to members of the Board of Directors. These restricted units vest ratably over four years with the grant date fair value equal to the market price on the date of grant. During the six months ended June 30, 2018, 801 units were granted with no restrictions to certain board members who elected to receive their quarterly board compensation in the form of units rather than cash. Units granted to directors are included in the calculation of total equity compensation expense which is recognized over the vesting period, for restricted units, or immediately for unrestricted units. Grants to retirement-eligible individuals on the date of grant are expensed immediately. The Partnership recognized $199,000 and $180,000 of equity compensation expense in the second quarter of 2018 and 2017, respectively, related to these compensation programs and $722,000 and $784,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

10.
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: interest paid, net of amounts capitalized, totaled $2.0 million and $1.9 million during the first six months of 2018 and 2017, respectively. Income taxes paid totaled $564,000 and $24,000 for the first six months of 2018 and 2017, respectively.

11.
During the first half of 2018, the Partnership closed on six acquisitions of timberland in western Washington totaling 1,342 acres for $7.2 million. The Partnership utilized $598,000 of funds held by like-kind exchange intermediaries to fund a portion of these acquisitions. The aggregate purchase price was allocated $869,000 to land and $6.3 million to timber and roads. Part of the consideration paid for one of these transactions involved the conveyance by the Partnership of 365 acres of non-strategic timberland to the seller, valued at $214,000, with the remainder paid in cash.

12.
The Partnership’s financial instruments include cash, accounts receivable, and a note receivable, included in other assets, for which the carrying amount of each represents fair value based on current market interest rates or their short-term nature.

Collectively, the Partnership’s and the Funds’ fixed-rate debt has a carrying value of $101.6 million as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. The estimated fair value of this debt, based on current interest rates for similar instruments (Level 2 inputs in the Fair Value Hierarchy), is approximately $102.0 million and $104.6 million as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

13.
The Partnership had an accrual for estimated environmental remediation costs of $7.0 million and $5.0 million as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. The environmental remediation liability represents management’s estimate of payments to be made to remediate and monitor certain areas in and around Port Gamble Bay, Washington.

In December 2013, a consent decree and Clean-up Action Plan (CAP) related to Port Gamble Bay were finalized with the Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) and filed with Kitsap County Superior Court. In the third quarter of 2015,

13


the Partnership selected a contractor to complete the remediation work. Remediation activity began in late September 2015. The required in-water portion of the cleanup was completed in January 2017. This will be followed by cleanup activity on the millsite and by a monitoring period, which is estimated to be approximately 15 years. Management’s cost estimates for the remainder of the project are based on amounts included in construction contracts, bids from contractors, and estimates for project management and other professional fees.

In February 2018, the Partnership and DOE entered into an agreed order with respect to the millsite under which the Partnership will perform a remedial investigation and feasibility study and develop a CAP. As with the in-water portion of the project, the CAP will define the scope of the remediation activity for the millsite. Management expects the design of the millsite cleanup to be substantially completed by approximately the end of 2018. Based on design work completed to date, it appears that a greater volume of sediment will need to be removed from the millsite than was previously anticipated. As a result of this, as well as updated estimates of long-term monitoring costs, the Partnership increased its accrual by $2.9 million in the second quarter of 2018. Because the design of the millsite cleanup is not yet finalized, it is reasonably possible that the accrual for the millsite component of the liability may still increase. The bulk of the millsite cleanup activity is expected to occur in 2019.

Certain environmental laws allow state, federal, and tribal trustees (collectively, the Trustees) to bring suit against property owners to recover damages for injuries to natural resources. Like the liability that attaches to current property owners in the cleanup context, liability for natural resource damages (NRD) can attach to a property owner simply because an injury to natural resources resulted from releases of hazardous substances on that owner’s property, regardless of culpability for the release. In the case of Port Gamble, the Trustees are alleging that the Partnership has NRD liability because of releases that occurred on its property. The Partnership has been in discussions with the Trustees regarding their claims and the alleged conditions in Port Gamble Bay, and has also been discussing restoration alternatives that might address the damages the Trustees allege. Discussions with the Trustees may result in an obligation for the Partnership to fund NRD restoration activities and past assessment costs that are greater than it has estimated, and it is reasonably possible that this component of the liability may increase beyond what has been accrued in the liability. Management expects to update its estimate of the NRD liability, or range of liability, during the next twelve months.

The environmental liability at June 30, 2018 is comprised of $2.4 million that management expects to expend in the next 12 months and $4.6 million thereafter.

Activity in the environmental liability is as follows:
 
(in thousands)
Balance at Beginning of the Period
 
Additions to Accrual
 
Expenditures for Remediation
 
Balance at Period-end
Year ended December 31, 2016
16,761

 
7,700

 
(11,691
)
 
12,770

Year ended December 31, 2017
12,770

 
—

 
(7,791
)
 
4,979

Quarter ended March 31, 2018
$
4,979

 
$
—

 
$
(219
)
 
$
4,760

Quarter ended June 30, 2018
$
4,760

 
$
2,900

 
$
(666
)
 
$
6,994



14


ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This report contains a number of projections and statements about our expected financial condition, operating results, and business plans and objectives. These statements reflect management’s estimates based upon our current expectations, in light of management’s knowledge of existing circumstances and expectations about future developments. Statements about expectations and future performance are “forward looking statements” within the meaning of applicable securities laws, which describe our goals, objectives and anticipated performance. These statements can be identified by words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “intend” and similar expressions. Some of these statements are inherently uncertain, and some or all of these statements may not come to pass. Accordingly, you should not interpret these statements as promises that we will perform at a given level or that we will take any or all of the actions we currently expect to take. Our future actions, as well as our actual performance, will vary from our current expectations, and under various circumstances these variations may be material and adverse. Some of the factors that may cause our actual operating results and financial condition to fall short of our expectations are set forth in the part of this report entitled “Risk Factors” in Part II, Item 1A below. From time to time we identify other risks and uncertainties in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The forward-looking statements in this report reflect our estimates and expectations as of the date of the report, and unless required by law, we do not undertake to update these statements as our business operations and environment change.

This discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included with this report. 
 
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

Pope Resources, A Delaware Limited Partnership (“we” or the “Partnership”), is engaged in four primary businesses: Partnership Timber, Funds Timber, Timberland Investment Management, and Real Estate.

By far the most significant segments, in terms of owned assets and operations, are our two timber segments, which we refer to as Partnership Timber and Funds Timber. These segments include timberlands owned directly by the Partnership and three private equity funds (“Fund II”, “Fund III” and “Fund IV”, collectively, the “Funds”), respectively. We refer to the timberland owned by the Partnership as the Partnership’s tree farms, and our Partnership Timber segment reflects operations from those properties. We refer to timberland owned by the Funds as the Funds’ tree farms, and operations from those properties are reported in our Funds Timber segment. When referring collectively to the Partnership’s and Funds’ timberland, we refer to them as the Combined tree farms. Operations in each of these segments consist of growing timber and manufacturing logs for sale to domestic wood products manufacturers and log export brokers.

Our Timberland Investment Management segment is engaged in organizing and managing private equity timber funds using capital invested by third parties and the Partnership. The Funds are consolidated into our financial statements, but then income or loss attributable to equity owned by third parties is subtracted from consolidated results in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income under the caption “Net and comprehensive (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests-ORM Timber Funds” to arrive at “Net and comprehensive income attributable to unitholders”.

Our current strategy for adding timberland acreage is centered primarily on our private equity timber fund business model. However, we acquire smaller timberland parcels from time to time to add on to the Partnership’s existing tree farms. In addition, during periods when the Funds’ committed capital is fully invested, we may look to acquire larger timberland properties for the Partnership. Our three active timber funds have assets under management totaling approximately $490 million as of June 30, 2018 based on the most recent appraisals. Through our 20% co-investment in Fund II, our 5% co-investment in Fund III, and our 15% co-investment in Fund IV, we have deployed $43 million of Partnership capital. Fund IV, launched in December 2016, is still in its investment period and has not yet drawn or deployed all of its committed capital. Our co-investment affords us a share of the Funds’ operating cash flows while also allowing us to earn asset management and timberland management fees, as well as potential future incentive fees, based upon the overall success of each fund. We also believe that this strategy allows us to maintain more sophisticated expertise in timberland acquisition, valuation, and management on a more cost-effective basis than we could for the Partnership’s timberlands alone. We believe our co-investment strategy also enhances our credibility with existing and prospective Fund investors by demonstrating that we have both an operational and a financial commitment to the Funds’ success.

Our Real Estate segment’s activities primarily include securing permits and entitlements, and in some cases, installing infrastructure for raw land development and then realizing that land’s value by selling larger parcels to developers who, in turn, seek to take the land further up the value chain by either selling homes to retail buyers or lots to developers of commercial

15


property. More recently, we have acquired and developed other real estate properties (not owned by the Partnership), either on our own or by partnering with another developer in a joint venture. Since these projects often span multiple years, the Real Estate segment may incur losses for multiple years while a project is developed, and will not recognize operating income until that project is sold. In addition, within this segment, we sometimes negotiate and sell development rights in the form of conservation easements (CE’s) on Partnership Timber properties which preclude future development, but allow continued forestry operations. The strategy for our Real Estate segment centers around how and when to “harvest” or sell a parcel of land to realize its optimal value. In doing so, we seek to balance the long-term risks and costs of carrying and developing a property against the potential for income and cash flows upon sale. Land held for development by our Real Estate segment represents property in western Washington that has been deemed suitable for residential and commercial building sites. Land and timber held for sale includes those properties in the development portfolio that we expect to sell in the next 12 months.

Outlook

We expect our 2018 harvest volume will be approximately 67 million board feet (MMBF) for the Partnership, and approximately 82 MMBF for the Funds, including timber deed sales. The 67 MMBF for the Partnership includes 15 MMBF of volume from timber located on Real Estate properties and recent small-tract acquisitions that is not factored into our long-term, sustainable harvest plan of 52 MMBF. On a look-through basis, defined as the Partnership plus its portion of the Funds based on its ownership interest in each Fund, 2018 harvest volume is expected to be 77 MMBF including timber deed sales. We will continue to monitor log markets and adjust our harvest levels accordingly as the year progresses.

The Puget Sound housing market remains strong, and we anticipate closing on additional residential lots from our Harbor Hill project in the fourth quarter, as well as potential sales from other projects in Kitsap County.

Timber - Overall
 
Operations. Timber results include operations on 120,000 acres of timberland owned by the Partnership in western Washington, and 124,000 acres of timberland owned by the Funds in western Washington, northwestern Oregon, southwestern Oregon, and northern California. Timber revenue is earned primarily from the harvest and sale of logs from these timberlands, and is driven primarily by the volume of timber harvested and the average log price realized on the sale of that timber. Our harvest volume typically represents delivered log sales to domestic mills and log export brokers. We also occasionally sell rights to harvest timber (timber deed sales) from the Combined tree farms. The metrics used to calculate volumes sold and average price realized during the reporting periods exclude timber deed sales, except where stated otherwise. Harvest volumes are generally expressed in million board feet (MMBF) increments while harvest revenue and related costs are generally expressed in terms of revenue or cost per thousand board feet (MBF).

Logs from the Combined tree farms serve a number of different domestic and export markets, with domestic mills historically representing our largest market destination. Export customers consist of log brokers who sell the logs primarily to Japan, China and, to a lesser degree, Korea. The ultimate decision of whether to sell our logs to the domestic or export market is based on the net proceeds we receive after taking into account both the delivered log prices and the cost to deliver logs to the customer. As such, our reported log price realizations will reflect our properties’ proximity to customers as well as the broader log market.

Timber revenue is also derived from commercial thinning operations, ground leases for cellular communication towers, and royalties from gravel mines and quarries, all of which, along with timber deed sales, are included in other revenue in the tables that follow. Commercial thinning consists of the selective cutting of timber stands not yet of optimal harvest age. The smaller diameter logs harvested in these operations do, however, have some commercial value, thus allowing us to earn revenue while at the same time improving the projected value at harvest of the remaining timber in the stand.

Log Prices. During Q2 2018, log prices declined slightly from prices realized during Q1 2018, but were well above the prices realized during Q2 2017. On a Combined basis, Q2 2018 realized log prices versus Q1 2018 for Douglas-fir sawlogs were down 4% and for whitewood sawlogs were up 2%. Q2 2018 realized log prices versus Q2 2017 for Douglas-fir sawlogs were up 19% and for whitewood sawlogs were up 13%. West Coast softwood lumber production during Q2 2018 was slightly below that of Q1 2018 and in line with that of Q2 2017. West Coast softwood log exports in Q2 2018 were 18% above exports during Q1 2018 and 2% above Q2 2017.

Year-to-date 2018 realized log prices increased 23% from the same period of 2017. On a Combined basis, YTD 2018 realized log prices versus YTD 2017 for Douglas-fir sawlogs were up 26% and for whitewood sawlogs were up 19%. West Coast softwood lumber production during the first six months of 2018 increased 4% relative to the same period a year ago, while West Coast softwood log exports decreased 9%.

16



Partnership Timber

Partnership Timber operating results for the quarters ended June 30, 2018, March 31, 2018, and June 30, 2017, and the six months ended June 30, 2018, and June 30, 2017, were as follows:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Six Months Ended
 
Q2 2018
 
Q1 2018
 
Q2 2017
 
Jun-18
 
Jun-17
Partnership
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Overall log price per MBF
$
726

 
$
779

 
$
616

 
$
765

 
$
615

Total volume (in MMBF)
6.9

 
18.8

 
12.5

 
25.7

 
26.6

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Log sale revenue
$
5,039

 
$
14,635

 
$
7,710

 
$
19,674

 
$
16,387

Other revenue
531

 
503

 
459

 
1,034

 
888

Total revenue
5,570

 
15,138

 
8,169

 
20,708

 
17,275

Cost of sales
(1,994
)
 
(5,026
)
 
(3,336
)
 
(7,020
)
 
(6,878
)
Operating expenses
(1,795
)
 
(1,460
)
 
(1,426
)
 
(3,255
)
 
(2,613
)
Operating income
$
1,781

 
$
8,652

 
$
3,407

 
$
10,433

 
$
7,784


Operating Income
 
Comparing Q2 2018 to Q1 2018.  Operating income decreased $6.9 million, or 78%, from Q1 2018. An average realized log price decrease of 7%, coupled with a 63% decrease in delivered log volume, resulted in a 66% decrease in log sale revenue. The decrease in delivered log volume during the second quarter reflects the decision to pull a significant amount of volume ahead into Q1 2018, when log prices were stronger than Q2 2018. A 23% increase in operating expenses was more than offset by a 60% decrease in cost of sales from the lower harvest volume.
 
Comparing Q2 2018 to Q2 2017.  Operating income decreased $1.6 million, or 48%, from Q2 2017, driven by a 45% decrease in delivered log volume, which was partially offset by an 18% rise in average realized log prices.

Comparing YTD 2018 to YTD 2017. Operating income increased $2.6 million, or 34% for the first six months of 2018 from the first six months of 2017.

Revenue
 
Comparing Q2 2018 to Q1 2018.  Log sale revenue in Q2 2018 decreased $9.6 million, or 66%, from Q1 2018 due to a 63% decrease in delivered log volume and a 7% decline in average realized log prices.

Comparing Q2 2018 to Q2 2017.  Log sale revenue in Q2 2018 decreased $2.7 million, or 35%, from Q2 2017, due to a 45% decrease in harvest volume, which was partially offset by an 18% rise in average realized log prices. Other revenue increased by $72,000.

Comparing YTD 2018 to YTD 2017. Log sale revenue in the first six months of 2018 increased by $3.3 million, or 20%, from the first six months of 2017.

 Log Prices

Partnership Timber log prices for the quarters ended June 30, 2018, March 31, 2018, and June 30, 2017, and six months ended June 30, 2018, and 2017, were as follows:


17


Average price realizations (per MBF)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Six Months Ended
 
Q2 2018
 
Q1 2018
 
Q2 2017
 
Jun-18
 
Jun-17
Partnership
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Douglas-fir domestic
$
812

 
$
850

 
$
674

 
$
841

 
$
660

Douglas-fir export
843

 
922

 
723

 
896

 
696

Whitewood domestic
529

 
549

 
474

 
542

 
462

Whitewood export
714

 
764

 
686

 
742

 
653

Cedar
1,373

 
1,458

 
1,513

 
1,422

 
1,423

Hardwood
721

 
708

 
687

 
713

 
661

Pulpwood
351

 
375

 
307

 
367

 
298

Overall log price
726

 
779

 
616

 
765

 
615


Comparing Q2 2018 to Q1 2018. Overall realized log prices in Q2 2018 were 7% lower than Q1 2018. Our overall average realized log price is influenced heavily by price movements for our two most prevalent species, Douglas-fir and whitewood, and the relative harvest volume mix of those two species. Realized sawlog prices decreased by 5% in Q2 2018 versus Q1 2018 for Douglas-fir and by 6% for whitewood. Prices for both species are above historic averages and reflect the continued strong demand in both the domestic and export markets during the quarter.

Comparing Q2 2018 to Q2 2017. From Q2 2017 to Q2 2018, average realized log prices increased 18%. The favorable change was attributable to an increase in lumber production which when combined with a strong export market resulted in price strength for both of our primary species with increases in Douglas-fir and whitewood log prices of 19% and 10%, respectively. Relative to Q2 2017, prices for cedar were down 9%, while hardwood sawlogs and all pulpwood species showed increases of 5% and 14%, respectively.

Comparing YTD 2018 to YTD 2017. Average realized log prices increased by 24% for all our species groups during the first six months of 2018, relative to the same period in 2017. Douglas-fir and whitewood realized log prices increased 27% and 19%, respectively. Prices increased for other species groups include: pine (21%), cedar (3%), hardwood (8%) and pulpwood (23%).

Log Volume

The Partnership harvested the following log volumes by species for the quarters ended June 30, 2018, March 31, 2018, and June 30, 2017, and the six months ended June 30, 2018, and 2017, were as follows:

Volume (in MMBF)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Six Months Ended
 
Q2 2018
 
Q1 2018
 
Q2 2017
 
Jun-18
 
Jun-17
Partnership
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Douglas-fir domestic
3.5

51
%
 
12.2

64
%
 
6.0

49
%
 
15.7

61
%
 
12.7

49
%
Douglas-fir export
0.8

12
%
 
1.8

10
%
 
1.9

15
%
 
2.6

10

 
4.9

18

Whitewood domestic
0.2

3
%
 
0.3

2
%
 
0.4

3
%
 
0.5

2

 
0.9

3

Whitewood export
0.3

4
%
 
0.5

3
%
 
0.4

3
%
 
0.8

3

 
0.9

3

Cedar
0.3

4
%
 
0.4

2
%
 
0.3

2
%
 
0.6

2

 
0.9

3

Hardwood
0.4

6
%
 
0.6

3
%
 
0.8

6
%
 
1.0

4

 
1.1

4

Pulpwood
1.4

20
%
 
3.0

16
%
 
2.7

22
%
 
4.5

18

 
5.2

20

Log sale volume
6.9

100
%
 
18.8

100
%
 
12.5

100
%
 
25.7

100
%
 
26.6

100
%
Timber deed sale volume
—

 
 
—

 
 
—

 
 
—

 
 
—

 
Total volume
6.9

 
 
18.8

 
 
12.5

 
 
25.7

 
 
26.6

 

Comparing Q2 2018 to Q1 2018. Harvest volume decreased 11.9 MMBF, or 63%, in Q2 2018 from Q1 2018. The decrease reflects our decision to pull planned harvest volume from Q2 into Q1 when log prices were stronger. Product mix was relatively consistent between the two comparable quarters, with the exception of a 15% decrease in the relative share of

18


domestic Douglas-fir, which reflects the decision to pull volume forward into Q1 as that sort received a strong premium from domestic mills as they scrambled to increase production to meet demand from the domestic softwood lumber market.

 Comparing Q2 2018 to Q2 2017. Harvest volume decreased 5.6 MMBF, or 45%, in Q2 2018 from Q2 2017. While volume was pulled forward from Q2 2018 to Q1 2018, our planned harvest volume in 2017 followed a more consistent quarterly pattern. Product mix was relatively consistent between the two comparable quarters.

Comparing YTD 2018 to YTD 2017. Relative to the first six months of 2017, YTD 2018 harvest volume decreased by 0.9 MMBF, or 3%. Product mix was relatively consistent between the two periods, with the exception of an 8% decrease in the Douglas-fir export sort and a 13% increase in the Douglas-fir domestic sort, which is indicative of the strengthening domestic market relative to the export market.

Cost of Sales
 
Cost of sales varies with harvest volume, and for the quarters ended June 30, 2018, March 31, 2018, and June 30, 2017, and the six months ended June 30, 2018, and 2017, was as follows, with the first part of the table expressing these costs in total dollars and the second part of the table expressing those costs that are driven by volume on a per MBF basis:

(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Six Months Ended
 
Q2 2018
 
Q1 2018
 
Q2 2017
 
Jun-18
 
Jun-17
Partnership
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Harvest, haul, and tax
$
1,513

 
$
3,728

 
$
2,428

 
$
5,241

 
$
4,948

Depletion
478

 
1,295

 
908

 
1,773

 
1,930

Other
3

 
3

 
—

 
6

 
—

Total cost of sales
$
1,994

 
$
5,026

 
$
3,336

 
$
7,020

 
$
6,878

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amounts per MBF *
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Harvest, haul, and tax
$
219

 
$
198

 
$
194

 
$
204

 
$
186

Depletion
$
69

 
$
69

 
$
73

 
$
69

 
$
73

 *
Timber deed sale volumes are excluded in the per MBF computation for harvest, haul and tax costs but included in the per MBF computation for depletion.
 
Comparing Q2 2018 to Q1 2018. Cost of sales decreased $3.0 million, or 60%, in Q2 2018 from Q1 2018 due to a 63% decrease in harvest volume. On a per-MBF basis, the harvest, haul and tax rate increased by 10% due to higher relative cost of the units harvested in the current quarter. Higher cost units are typically harvested as the winter weather wanes, allowing access to higher elevation and more expensive portions of our tree farms.
 
Comparing Q2 2018 to Q2 2017. Cost of sales decreased $1.3 million, or 40%, in Q2 2018 from Q2 2017 due to a 45% decrease in harvest volume. On a per-MBF basis, the harvest, haul and tax rate increased by 13%, while the per-MBF depletion rate decreased by 5%. Harvest and haul costs are up in the current quarter due to higher relative cost of the units harvested in the current quarter.
Comparing YTD 2018 to YTD 2017. Year-to-date 2018 cost of sales increased $142,000, or 2%, relative to the same period in 2017 due to a 10% increase in the per-MBF harvest, haul and tax rate, which was partially offset by a 5% decrease in the per-MBF depletion rate and a 3% decline in harvest volume.

Operating Expenses
 
Operating expenses include the cost of maintaining existing roads and building temporary roads for harvesting, silviculture costs, and other management expenses. For the quarters ended June 30, 2018, March 31, 2018, and June 30, 2017, segment operating expenses were $1.8 million, $1.5 million, and $1.4 million, respectively. The $335,000 increase in operating expenses in Q2 2018 from Q1 2018 is attributable to higher management, silviculture and road maintenance expenses. Operating expenses increased by $370,000 from Q2 2017 to Q2 2018 due to higher road maintenance and management expenses, which were partially offset by lower silviculture expenses.


19


Funds Timber

Funds Timber operating results for quarters ended June 30, 2018, March 31, 2018, and June 30, 2017, and six months ended June 30, 2018, and 2017, were as follows:

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Six Months Ended
 
Q2 2018
 
Q1 2018
 
Q2 2017
 
Jun-18
 
Jun-17
Funds
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Overall log price per MBF
$
707

 
$
698

 
$
617

 
$
718

 
$
594

Total volume (MMBF)
28.6

 
13.1

 
12.8

 
41.7

 
26.4

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Log sale revenue
$
8,494

 
$
9,509

 
$
6,630

 
$
18,003

 
$
14,232

Other revenue
9,423

 
32

 
643

 
9,455

 
747

Total revenue
17,917

 
9,541

 
7,273

 
27,458

 
14,979

Cost of sales
(11,870
)
 
(6,952
)
 
(5,190
)
 
(18,822
)
 
(12,283
)
Operating expenses - internal
(2,525
)
 
(1,806
)
 
(1,662
)
 
(4,331
)
 
(3,435
)
Gain on sale of timberland
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
12,503

Operating income - internal
3,522

 
783

 
421

 
$
4,305

 
$
11,764

Eliminations *
1,140

 
1,024

 
817

 
$
2,164

 
$
1,665

Operating income - external
$
4,662

 
$
1,807

 
$
1,238

 
$
6,469

 
$
13,429

* Represents management fees charged to the Funds and eliminated from operating expenses in consolidation. In the TIM segment, these fees are reflected as revenue, on an internal reporting basis, and eliminated in consolidation.

Operating Income
 
Comparing Q2 2018 to Q1 2018. Operating income increased $2.9 million from Q1 2018. Other revenue increased by $9.4 million, driven by timber deed sales of 16.6 MMBF that had no counterpart in Q1 2018. The higher total revenue was partially offset by 71% and 40% increases in cost of sales and operating expenses, respectively. An 8% decrease in delivered log volume was partially offset by a 1% increase in the average realized log price, resulting in a 11% decrease in log sale revenue.
 
Comparing Q2 2018 to Q2 2017. Operating income increased $3.4 million from Q2 2017, driven by a 15% increase in average delivered log price, a 1.3 MMBF increase in delivered log volume and a 14.5 MMBF increase in timber deed sale volume. The $8.8 million increase in other revenue reflects the 14.5 MMBF increase in timber deed sale volume, which included a 77% increase in prices associated with that volume. The higher total revenue in Q2 2018 was partially offset by $6.7 million and $863,000 increases in cost of sales and operating expenses, respectively.

Comparing YTD 2018 to YTD 2017. Year-to-date operating income decreased $7.0 million from the first six months of 2017. Our YTD 2017 results reflect a $12.5 million gain on the January 2017 sale of a 6,500-acre tree farm on the Oregon coast by Fund II. Excluding this gain, operating income increased by $5.5 million, driven by a $8.7 million rise in other revenue related to higher timber deed sales and a 25% increase in average realized log prices. Offsetting these were a 53% increase in cost of sales and a 26% increase in operating expenses.

The table below reflects the Partnership’s share of the Funds’ results based on its 20%, 5%, and 15% ownership interest in Fund II, Fund III, and Fund IV, respectively. We present this as additional information to help readers understand the financial benefit we receive from investing in these private equity vehicles and the resulting economics of owning Pope Resources units. These results will fluctuate between periods based on the relative activity in each fund and the Partnership’s different ownership interest in each fund:

20


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Six Months Ended
 
Q2 2018
 
Q1 2018
 
Q2 2017
 
Jun-18
 
Jun-17
Partnership's share of Funds
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total volume (MMBF)
3.7

 
1.7

 
1.8

 
5.4

 
3.5

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Log sale revenue
$
1,091

 
$
1,207

 
$
1,076

 
$
2,298

 
$
2,038

Other revenue
1,255

 
5

 
32

 
1,260

 
39

Total revenue
2,346

 
1,212

 
1,108

 
3,558

 
2,077

Cost of sales
(1,463
)
 
(781
)
 
(700
)
 
(2,245
)
 
(1,465
)
Operating expenses - internal
(325
)
 
(201
)
 
(198
)
 
(525
)
 
(415
)
Gain on sale of timberland
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
2,501

Operating income - internal
558

 
230

 
210

 
788

 
2,698

Eliminations *
129

 
113

 
84

 
241

 
169

Operating income - external
$
687

 
$
343

 
$
294

 
$
1,029

 
$
2,867

* Represents the Partnership’s share of management fees charged to the Funds and eliminated from operating expenses in consolidation. In the TIM segment, these fees are reflected as revenue, on an internal reporting basis, and eliminated in consolidation.

Revenue
 
Comparing Q2 2018 to Q1 2018. Total revenue in Q2 2018 increased $8.4 million, or 88%, from Q1 2018 due to a $9.4 million increase in other revenue, which was partially offset by a $1.0 million decrease in log sale revenue. The increase in other revenue was driven by $8.9 million of timber deed sales, which had no counterpart in Q1 2018. The decrease in log sale revenue reflects a decrease in harvest volume of 1.1 MMBF, which was partially offset by a 1% increase in the average delivered log price.

Comparing Q2 2018 to Q2 2017. Total revenue in Q2 2018 increased $10.6 million from Q2 2017 due to an $8.8 million increase in other revenue and a $1.9 million in log sale revenue. The increase in other revenue was primarily driven by a $8.3 million increase in timber deed sales. The increase in log sale revenue was due to 12% and 15% increases in delivered log volume and realized log prices, respectively.

Comparing YTD 2018 to YTD 2017. Total revenue for the first six months of 2018 increased $12.5 million, or 83%, relative to the same period of 2017. The increase in log sale revenue was driven by a 21% increase in average realized log prices and a 5% rise in delivered log volume. The increase in other revenue was primarily driven by a $8.2 million increase in timber deed sales.

Log Prices

Funds Timber log prices for quarters ended June 30, 2018, March 31, 2018, and June 30, 2017 and the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, were as follows:

21


Average price realizations (per MBF)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Six Months Ended
 
Q2 2018
 
Q1 2018
 
Q2 2017
 
Jun-18
 
Jun-17
Funds
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Douglas-fir domestic
$
815

 
$
797

 
$
674

 
$
822

 
$
660

Douglas-fir export
870

 
896

 
759

 
908

 
762

Whitewood domestic
662

 
622

 
585

 
664

 
553

Whitewood export
727

 
745

 
691

 
722

 
616

Pine
513

 
511

 
486

 
509

 
501

Cedar
1,276

 
1,161

 
1,012

 
1,326

 
1,189

Hardwood
778

 
758

 
660

 
753

 
651

Pulpwood
357

 
332

 
271

 
371

 
284

Overall log price
707

 
698

 
617

 
718

 
594

Timber deed sales
534

 
—

 
301

 
534

 
292


Comparing Q2 2018 to Q1 2018. Overall realized log prices in Q2 2018 were 1% higher than Q1 2018. Price movements for our two most prevalent species, Douglas-fir and whitewood, were mixed depending on the market. Domestic prices increased 2% and 6% for Douglas-fir and whitewood, respectively, while export prices decreased 3% and 2%. Prices for both species are above historic averages and reflect the continued strong demand in both the domestic and export markets during the quarter. Meaningful increases were also realized for cedar (10%) and pulpwood (8%).

Comparing Q2 2018 to Q2 2017. From Q2 2017 to Q2 2018, average realized log prices increased 15%. The favorable change was attributable to price strength for both of our primary species with volume-weighted (domestic and export) increases in Douglas-fir and whitewood realized log prices of 19% and 12%, respectively, due to strength in both the domestic and export markets. Relative to Q2 2017, price increases were also realized for pine (6%), cedar (26%), hardwood (18%), and pulpwood (32%).

Comparing YTD 2018 to YTD 2017. Realized log prices increased for all of our species groups during the first six months of 2018, relative to the same period in 2017. Douglas-fir and whitewood volume-weighted (domestic and export) increases realized log prices increased 24% and 18%, respectively. Price increases for other species groups include: pine (2%), cedar (12%), hardwood (16%) and pulpwood (31%).

Log Volume

The Funds harvested the following log volumes by species for the quarters ended June 30, 2018, March 31, 2018, and June 30, 2017, and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017:


22


Volume (in MMBF)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Six Months Ended
 
Q2 2018
 
Q1 2018
 
Q2 2017
 
Jun-18
 
Jun-17
Funds
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Douglas-fir domestic
3.4

27
%
 
3.8

29
%
 
3.7

34
%
 
7.3

29
%
 
8.8

37
%
Douglas-fir export
2.3

19
%
 
1.6

12
%
 
2.2

21
%
 
4.0

16
%
 
3.3

14
%
Whitewood domestic
2.1

18
%
 
4.9

37
%
 
1.9

18
%
 
7.0

28
%
 
5.0

21
%
Whitewood export
1.2

10
%
 
0.4

3
%
 
0.6

6
%
 
1.6

6
%
 
2.0

8
%
Pine
0.9

8
%
 
0.2

2
%
 
1.3

12
%
 
1.0

4
%
 
1.3

5
%
Cedar
0.1

1
%
 
0.3

2
%
 
—

—
%
 
0.4

2
%
 
0.2

1
%
Hardwood
0.3

3
%
 
0.2

2
%
 
—

—
%
 
0.5

2
%
 
0.2

1
%
Pulpwood
1.7

14
%
 
1.7

13
%
 
1.0

9
%
 
3.3

13
%
 
3.2

13
%
Log sale volume
12.0

100
%
 
13.1

100
%
 
10.7

100
%
 
25.1

100
%
 
24.0

100
%
Timber deed sale volume
16.6

 
 
—

 
 
2.1

 
 
16.6

 
 
2.4

 
Total volume
28.6

 
 
13.1

 
 
12.8

 
 
41.7

 
 
26.4

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Partnership’s share of funds
3.7

 
 
1.7

 
 
1.8

 
 
5.4

 
 
3.5

 

Comparing Q2 2018 to Q1 2018. Harvest volume, including timber deed sales, increased 15.5 MMBF in Q2 2018 from Q1 2018. This increase was driven by the 16.6 MMBF sold as timber deeds in Q2 2018, which had no counterpart in Q1 2018. The relative volume sold to the export market increased by 14%, from 15% of Q1 2018 total volume to 29% of Q2 2018 total volume. The relative volume of whitewood sold into the domestic market decreased by 19%.

 Comparing Q2 2018 to Q2 2017. Harvest volume, including timber deed sales, increased by 15.8 MMBF in Q2 2018 from Q2 2017, with 14.5 MMBF and 1.3 MMBF increases in timber deed contracts and delivered log volume , respectively. The relative volume of Douglas-fir and pine decreased by 11% and 4% respectively, while the relative volume of whitewood and pulpwood increased by 4% and 5%, respectively.

Comparing YTD 2018 to YTD 2017. Harvest volume, including timber deed sales, increased by 15.3 MMBF, or 58%, in the first six months of 2018 relative to the same period in 2017. The increase was driven primarily by the sale of timber deed contracts for 14.0 MMBF on two properties that were acquired during Q1 2018. The relative volume mix for Douglas-fir decreased by 6%, while that of whitewood increased by 5%.

Cost of Sales
 
Cost of sales vary with harvest volume. Because the Funds’ tree farms were acquired much more recently than those of the Partnership, the depletion rates for the Funds’ tree farms are much higher than for the Partnership. For the quarters ended June 30, 2018, March 31, 2018, and June 30, 2017, and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, cost of sales were as follows, with the first part of the table expressing these costs in total dollars and the second part of the table expressing those costs that are driven by volume on a per MBF basis:


23


(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Six Months Ended
 
Q2 2018
 
Q1 2018
 
Q2 2017
 
Jun-18
 
Jun-17
Funds
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Harvest, haul, and tax *
$
2,924

 
$
3,517

 
$
2,535

 
$
6,441

 
$
5,728

Depletion *
8,946

 
3,422

 
2,655

 
12,368

 
6,555

Other
—

 
13

 
—

 
13

 
—

Total cost of sales
$
11,870

 
$
6,952

 
$
5,190

 
$
18,822

 
$
12,283

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Partnership’s share of Funds
$
1,465

 
$
782

 
$
700

 
$
2,247

 
$
1,465

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amounts per MBF
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Harvest, haul, and tax
$
244

 
$
268

 
$
237

 
$
257

 
$
239

Depletion
$
313

 
$
261

 
$
207

 
$
297

 
$
248

* Timber deed sale volumes are excluded in the per MBF computation for harvest, haul, and tax costs but included in the per MBF computation for depletion.

Comparing Q2 2018 to Q1 2018. Cost of sales increased $4.9 million, or 71%, in Q2 2018 from Q1 2018 due to a 118% increase in harvest volume, including timber deed sales. A 20% increase in the Funds’ average depletion rate, due to the mix of harvest volume from the Funds’ properties, was partially offset by a 9% decrease in the per-MBF harvest, haul, and tax rates, which was driven by less expensive harvest units and shorter hauls to customers in Q2 2018 compared to Q1 2018.
 
Comparing Q2 2018 to Q2 2017. Cost of sales increased $6.7 million, or 129%, in Q2 2018 from Q2 2017, as a result of a 123% increase in harvest volume, including timber deed sales.

Comparing YTD 2018 to YTD 2017. Cost of sales increased $6.5 million, or 53%, in the first six months of 2018 relative to the same period in 2017 due to a 15.3 MMBF, or 58%, increase in harvest volume, including timber deed sales.

Operating Expenses
 
Operating expenses include the cost of maintaining existing roads and building temporary roads for harvesting, silviculture costs, and other management expenses that include the asset and timberland management fees charged to the Funds. These fees, which are the source of revenue for our Timberland Investment Management segment (discussed below), are eliminated in consolidation, and amounted to $1.1 million, $1.0 million, $816,000 in Q2 2018, Q1 2018, and Q2 2017, respectively. After elimination of these fees, for the quarters ended June 30, 2018, March 31, 2018, and June 30, 2017, Fund operating expenses were $1.4 million, $782,000, and $845,000, respectively.

The $603,000 increase in operating expenses in Q2 2018 from Q1 2018 is attributable in part to operating expenses incurred on the Fund IV properties which were acquired during Q1 2018. Specific cost increases include $342,000 and $292,000 in road maintenance and silviculture expenses, respectively, that were partially offset by a $31,000 decrease in management expenses.

Operating expenses increased by $540,000 between Q2 2017 and Q2 2018, again due in part to operating expenses incurred on the Fund IV properties which were acquired during Q1 2018. Specific cost increases include $472,000 in road maintenance and $113,000 in management expenses, which were only partially offset by a $45,000 decrease in silviculture expenses.

Operating expenses increased by $397,000 during the first six months of 2018 relative to the same period in 2017, driven by the Fund IV acquisitions and include increases of $440,000 and $19,000 in road maintenance and silviculture expenses, respectively, that were only partially offset by a $62,000 decrease in management expenses.

Gain on Sale of Timberland

There were no timberland sales during the first half of 2018. The $12.5 million gain on sale of timberland in the first quarter of 2017 resulted from the sale of a 6,500-acre tree farm on the Oregon coast by Fund II for $26.5 million.


24


Timberland Investment Management
 
The Timberland Investment Management (TIM) segment manages timberland portfolios on behalf of three private equity timber funds that currently own a combined 124,000 acres of commercial timberland in western Washington, northwestern Oregon, southwestern Oregon, and northern California. Total assets under management are $490 million based on the most recent appraisals and the recent Fund IV timberland acquisition values.

Fund Distributions and Fees Paid to the Partnership

Fund distributions are paid from available Fund cash, generated primarily from the harvest and sale of timber after paying all Fund expenses, management fees, and recurring capital costs. The Partnership received combined distributions from the Funds of $905,000 and $6.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The 2017 distributions included $5.5 million from Fund II’s sale of a 6,500-acre tree farm.
The Partnership earned asset, investment, and timberland management fees from the Funds of $2.2 million and $1.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. These fees, which represent a portion of the operating expenses in our Funds Timber segment (discussed above) are eliminated as the Funds are consolidated in our financial statements, as shown in the table below.
Revenue and Operating Loss

The fees earned from managing the Funds include a fixed component related to invested capital and acres owned, and a variable component related to harvest volume from the Funds’ tree farms.
 
Revenue and operating loss for the TIM segment for the quarters ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
  
 
 
Quarter Ended
(in thousands, except invested capital, volume and acre data)
 
Jun-18
 
Jun-17
Revenue internal
 
$
1,140

 
$
817

Intersegment eliminations
 
(1,140
)
 
(817
)
Revenue external
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
 
 
 
 
Operating income internal
 
$
85

 
$
(35
)
Intersegment eliminations
 
(1,001
)
 
(716
)
Operating loss external
 
$
(916
)
 
$
(751
)
 
 
 
 
 
Invested capital (in millions)
 
$
354

 
$
240

Acres owned by Funds
 
124,000

 
88,000

Harvest volume - Funds (MMBF), including timber deed sales
 
28.6

 
12.8

 
TIM generated management fee revenue of $1.1 million and $817,000 from managing the Funds during Q2 2018 and Q2 2017, respectively. The $320,000 increase in revenue resulted primarily from an increase in management fees associated with a rise in invested capital and acres owned following the acquisition of two properties by Fund IV in Q1 2018.

Operating expenses rose for the quarter ended June 30, 2018, versus the comparable period in 2017, totaling $916,000 and $751,000, respectively, due to costs associated with capital placement efforts associated with our fourth timber fund as well as additional personnel costs to manage our expanding timber fund portfolio.

Revenue and operating loss for the TIM segment for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
 

25


 
 
Six Months Ended
(in thousands, except invested capital, volume and acre data)
 
Jun-18
 
Jun-17
Revenue internal
 
$
2,164

 
$
1,665

Intersegment eliminations
 
(2,164
)
 
(1,665
)
Revenue external
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
 
 
 
 
Operating income (loss) internal
 
$
33

 
$
(260
)
Intersegment eliminations
 
(1,896
)
 
(1,457
)
Operating loss external
 
$
(1,863
)
 
$
(1,717
)
 
 
 
 
 
Invested capital (in millions)
 
$
354

 
$
240

Acres owned by Funds
 
124,000

 
88,000

Harvest volume - Funds (MMBF), including timber deed sales
 
41.7

 
26.4


TIM generated management fee revenue of $2.2 million and $1.7 million from managing the Funds for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The acquisition of two tree farms by Fund IV in 1Q-2018 resulted in a $477,000 increase in revenue associated with management fees.
 
Operating expenses incurred by the TIM segment for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 totaled $1.9 million and $1.7 million, respectively. The increase in operating expenses is attributable to costs associated with capital placement efforts associated with our fourth timber fund as well as additional personnel costs to manage our expanding timber fund portfolio.


Real Estate
 
The Partnership’s Real Estate segment produces its revenue primarily from the sale of land within its 2,100-acre portfolio. Additional sources of revenue include sales of development rights and tracts of land from the Partnership’s timberland portfolio, together with residential and commercial property rents earned from our Port Gamble and Poulsbo properties. In addition, we may acquire and develop other properties for sale, either on our own or by partnering with other experienced real estate developers. Real Estate holdings are located in the Washington counties of Pierce, Kitsap, and Jefferson with sales of land for this segment typically falling into one of three general types:

•
Residential and commercial plat land sales represent land sold after development rights have been obtained and are generally sold with prescribed infrastructure improvements.

•
Rural residential lot sales that generally require some capital improvements such as zoning, road building, or utility access improvements prior to completing the sale.

•
The sale of unimproved land, which generally consists of larger acreage sales rather than single lot sales, is normally completed with very little capital investment prior to sale.

In addition to outright sales of fee simple interests in land, we also enter into conservation easement (CE) sales that allow us to retain the right to harvest and manage timberland, but bar any future subdivision of, or real estate development on, the property.
 
“Land Held for Development” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets represents the Partnership’s cost basis in land that has been identified as having greater value as development property than timberland. Our Real Estate segment personnel work with local officials to obtain entitlements for further development of these parcels.

Those properties that are for sale, under contract, and management expects to sell within the next 12 months, are classified on our balance sheet as a current asset under “Land and Timber Held for Sale”. The $10.7 million amount currently in Land and Timber Held for Sale reflects properties that are under contract and expected to close between now and the end of the second quarter of 2019, comprising residential and commercial parcels from our Harbor Hill project in Gig Harbor, Washington, and a residential parcel in Bremerton, Washington.

26


 
Project costs that are associated directly with the development and construction of a real estate project are capitalized and then included in cost of sales when the property is sold, along with our original basis in the underlying land and the closing costs associated with the sale transaction.
 
Results from Real Estate operations often vary significantly from period-to-period as we make multi-year investments in entitlements and infrastructure prior to selling entitled or developed land.

Comparing Q2 2018 to Q2 2017. In Q2 2018, we closed on the sale of a conservation easement covering 7,800 acres of timberland for $3.7 million, as well as a residential lot and a parcel of undeveloped land for $176,000. In Q2 2017, we closed on the sale of a 10-acre rural residential lot for $170,000. Rental and other revenue increased from $279,000 in Q2 2017 to $419,000 in Q2 2018 due primarily to development and asset management fees related to our joint venture project on Bainbridge Island, Washington. We recorded environmental remediation expense of $2.9 million in the second quarter of 2018 based on updated estimates of costs for our project in Port Gamble, WA, as discussed in more detail below. Excluding the environmental remediation expense, Real Estate operating expenses were $1.1 million during Q2 2018 and $1.5 million during Q2 2017. The decrease in operating expenses is due primarily to lower professional fees in connection with planning and development for properties, as well as reduced labor costs resulting from fewer personnel in the Real Estate segment in 2018 as the Harbor Hill project progresses towards completion. These factors resulted in an operating loss of $315,000 for Q2 2018 compared to $1.5 million for Q2 2017.

Comparing YTD 2018 to YTD 2017. All of the development transactions in the first six months of 2018 and 2017 occurred in the second quarter of each year, as described above, however the first six months of 2017 also included $285,000 of revenue recognized under the percentage-of-completion method on parcels sold in Q4 2016 from our Harbor Hill development. As with the second quarter results, the year-to-date increase in rental and other income was due primarily development and asset management fees related to our joint venture project on Bainbridge Island, Washington. Excluding the $2.9 million Q2 2018 environmental remediation expense, Real Estate operating expenses decreased from $2.7 million to $2.0 million for the first six months of 2017 and 2018, respectively, due primarily to lower professional fees in connection with planning and development for properties, as well as reduced labor costs resulting from fewer personnel in the Real Estate segment in 2018 as the Harbor Hill project progresses towards completion. These factors resulted in an operating loss of $1.2 million for the first six months of 2018 compared to an operating loss of $2.7 million for the corresponding period of 2017.

Real Estate revenue and gross margin are summarized in the table below for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017:

(in thousands, except units sold and per unit amounts)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
For the six months ended:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Description
 
Revenue
 
Gross Margin
 
Units Sold
 
Revenue per unit
 
Gross Margin per unit
Development rights (CE)
 
$
3,730

 
$
3,485

 
Acres:
 
7,800

 
478

 
447

Residential
 
151

 
104

 
Acres:
 
10

 
15,100

 
10,400

Unimproved land
 
125

 
67

 
Acres:
 
14

 
8,929

 
4,786

Total land
 
4,006

 
3,656

 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Rentals and other
 
727

 
44

 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

June 30, 2018 total
 
$
4,733

 
$
3,700

 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential land sales *
 
$
455

 
$
213

 
Acres:
 
10

 
45,500

 
21,300

Total land
 
455

 
213

 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

Rentals and other
 
527

 
(250
)
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

June 30, 2017 total
 
$
982

 
$
(37
)
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

* Includes $285,000 of revenue recognized in the current period from lots sold in previous periods.

Environmental Remediation

27


As disclosed previously, we have a liability for environmental remediation at Port Gamble, Washington, due to contamination that we believe to have occurred in Port Gamble prior to our 1985 acquisition of the property from Pope & Talbot, Inc. (P&T), or between that acquisition and the time P&T ceased to operate the site. We have adjusted that liability from time to time based on evolving circumstances. The required remediation in Port Gamble Bay was completed in January 2017. We are working with DOE to formulate the design of the millsite cleanup, which we expect to result in a consent decree and cleanup action plan (CAP) specific to the millsite. We expect the design of the millsite cleanup to be substantially completed by approximately the end of 2018. Based on design work completed to date, it appears that we will need to remove a greater volume of sediment from the millsite than we previously anticipated. This higher volume of material to excavate, related capping, and updated estimates of long-term monitoring costs, led us to increase our accrual by $2.9 million in the second quarter of 2018. As the design of the millsite cleanup is not yet finalized, it is reasonably possible that the accrual for the millsite component of the liability may still increase. The bulk of the millsite cleanup activity is expected to occur in 2019.
Certain environmental laws allow state, federal, and tribal trustees (collectively, the Trustees) to bring suit against property owners to recover damages for injuries to natural resources. Like the liability that attaches to current property owners in the cleanup context, liability for natural resource damages (NRD) can attach to a property owner simply because an injury to natural resources resulted from releases of hazardous substances on that owner’s property, regardless of culpability for the release. In the case of Port Gamble, the Trustees are alleging that the Partnership has NRD liability because of releases that occurred on its property. We have been in discussions with the Trustees regarding their claims and the alleged conditions in Port Gamble Bay, and have also been discussing restoration alternatives that might address the damages the Trustees allege. Discussions with the Trustees may result in an obligation for us to fund NRD restoration activities and past assessment costs that are greater than we have estimated, and it is reasonably possible that this component of the liability may increase. We expect to update our estimate of the NRD liability, or range of liability, during the next twelve months.

In addition to the millsite cleanup and NRD components of the project, costs may still change as a result of unforeseen conditions. For example, as we transition to the maintenance and monitoring phases of the project, conditions may arise that require corrective action, and monitoring protocols may change over time. The monitoring period is estimated to be approximately 15 years. In addition, extreme weather events could cause damage to sediment caps that would need to be repaired. These factors could result in additional costs.
Should any future circumstances result in a change to the estimated cost of the project, we will record an appropriate adjustment to the liability in the period it becomes known and when we can reasonably estimate the amount.

General and Administrative (G&A)
 
G&A expenses were flat at $1.4 million for the second quarters of 2018 and 2017. G&A expenses decreased to $3.0 million for the first six months of 2018 from $3.1 million for the first six months of 2017. The decrease is primarily due to lower personnel costs, particularly incentive compensation.
 

Interest Expense, Net
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands)
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Interest income - Partnership
$
34

 
$
1

 
$69
 
$3
Interest expense - Partnership
(782
)
 
(670
)
 
(1,458)
 
(1,229)
Interest expense - Funds
(581
)
 
(582
)
 
(1,157)
 
(1,151)
Capitalized interest - Partnership
81

 
134

 
154
 
250
Interest expense, net
$
(1,248
)
 
$
(1,117
)
 
$(2,392)
 
$(2,127)

The increase in interest income is due to interest on the note receivable from the sale in December 2017 of an 11-acre parcel from our Harbor Hill project to the City of Gig Harbor.
The Partnership’s and Fund III’s debt arrangements with Northwest Farm Credit Services (NWFCS) are included in the latter’s patronage program, which rebates a portion of interest paid in the prior year back to the borrower. This NWFCS patronage program is a feature common to most of this lender’s loan agreements. The patronage program reduced interest expense by $270,000 and $234,000 for Q2 2018 and Q2 2017, respectively, and by $598,000 and $548,000 for the first six

28


months of 2018 and 2017, respectively. The increases in both interest expense and patronage are due to higher average debt balances in 2018.
Capitalized interest decreased from 2017 to 2018 due to the reduction in basis from 2017 due to completed construction activity at Harbor Hill.

Income Tax
 
The Partnership and Funds recorded consolidated income tax expense of $29,000 and $3,000 for Q2 2018 and Q2 2017, respectively, and $127,000 and $59,000 for the first six months of 2018 and 2017, respectively.
 
Pope Resources is a limited partnership and is therefore not subject to federal income tax. Taxable income/loss is instead reported to unitholders each year on a Form K-1 for inclusion in each unitholder’s income tax return. However, Pope Resources and the Funds do have corporate subsidiaries that are subject to income tax, giving rise to the line item for such tax in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.



29


Noncontrolling interests
 
The line item “Net and comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests - ORM Timber Funds” represents the combination of the portions of the net income or loss for the Funds which are attributable to third-party owners: 80% for Fund II, 95% for Fund III, and 85% for Fund IV.

The line item “Net and comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests - Real Estate ” represents two-thirds of the net income or loss from a Real Estate entity, Ferncliff Investors, that is attributable to third party owners. Ferncliff Investors holds a 50% interest in an unconsolidated real estate joint venture entity.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
We do not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We ordinarily finance our business activities using operating cash flows and, where appropriate in our assessment, commercial credit arrangements with banks or other financial institutions. During periods of reduced operating cash flows, we have available to us lines of credit that can be accessed in order to provide for liquidity needs. We expect that funds generated internally from operations and externally through financing will provide the required resources for the Partnership’s operations and capital expenditures for at least the next twelve months.

The Partnership’s debt consists of mortgage debt with fixed and variable interest rate tranches and operating lines of credit with Northwest Farm Credit Services (NWFCS). The mortgage debt at June 30, 2018 includes $51.8 million in term loans with NWFCS structured in five tranches that mature from 2019 through 2028, and is collateralized by portions of the Partnership’s timberland. Our commercial office building in Poulsbo, Washington is collateral for a $2.4 million loan from NWFCS that matures in 2023. We also have available a $31.0 million facility with NWFCS structured as a revolving credit facility through December 31, 2019, after which it converts to a term loan with multiple tranches that have an ultimate maturity in July 2027. At June 30, 2018, $16.0 million was outstanding under this facility at a variable rate based on the one-month LIBOR rate plus 1.85%. Our $20.0 million operating line of credit matures April 1, 2020, and we had $20.0 million drawn as of June 30, 2018. The line of credit carries a variable interest rate that is based on the one-month LIBOR rate plus 1.50%.
 
These debt agreements contain covenants that are measured either quarterly or annually, consisting of the following:
•a minimum interest coverage ratio of 3:1;
•
a maximum debt-to-total-capitalization ratio of 30%, with total capitalization calculated using fair market (vs. carrying) value of timberland, roads and timber; and
•
a maximum debt-to-appraised value of collateral of 50%.

The Partnership is in compliance with these covenants as of June 30, 2018, and expects to remain in compliance for at least the next twelve months.
 
Mortgage debt within the Funds is collateralized by Fund properties only, with no recourse to the Partnership. Fund II has a timberland mortgage comprised of two fixed rate tranches totaling $25.0 million with MetLife Insurance Company. The tranches are non-amortizing and collateralized by a portion of Fund II’s timberland portfolio, with both tranches maturing in September 2020. The loans allow for, but do not require, annual principal payments of up to 10% of outstanding principal without incurring a make-whole premium. Fund III has a timberland mortgage comprised of two fixed rate tranches totaling $32.4 million with NWFCS. The mortgage is non-amortizing and collateralized by a portion of Fund III’s timberland, with an $18.0 million tranche maturing in December 2023 and a $14.4 million tranche maturing in October 2024.

Fund II’s mortgage contains a requirement to maintain a loan-to-value ratio of less than 50%, with the denominator defined as fair market value. Fund III’s mortgage contains covenants, measured annually, that requires Fund III to maintain an interest coverage ratio of 1.5:1, maintain working capital of $500,000, and not exceed a debt-to-appraised value of collateral of 50%. Fund II and Fund III are in compliance with these covenants as of June 30, 2018, and we expect they will remain in compliance for at least the next twelve months.
 

30


The $1.9 million decrease in cash generated for the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to June 30, 2017 is explained in the following table:
 
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands)
2018
 
Change
 
2017
Cash provided by operating activities
$
18,329

 
$
12,709

 
$
5,620

 
 
 
 
 
 
Investing activities
 
 
 
 
 
Reforestation and roads
(1,861
)
 
(752
)
 
(1,109
)
Capital expenditures
(462
)
 
(370
)
 
(92
)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
4

 
(26
)
 
30

Investment in unconsolidated real estate joint venture
(250
)
 
(250
)
 
—

Acquisition of timberland - Partnership
(6,355
)
 
(1,404
)
 
(4,951
)
Acquisition of timberland - Funds
(108,364
)
 
(108,364
)
 
—

Proceeds from sale of timberland - Funds
—

 
(26,444
)
 
26,444

Cash provided by (used in) investing activities
(117,288
)
 
(137,610
)
 
20,322

Financing activities
 

 
 

 
 

Line of credit borrowings
24,300

 
5,793

 
18,507

Line of credit repayments
(4,500
)
 
3,500

 
(8,000
)
Repayment of long-term debt
(61
)
 
4,998

 
(5,059
)
Debt issuances costs
—

 
77

 
(77
)
Units issued under distribution reinvestment plan
120

 
120

 
—

Unit repurchases
(653
)
 
(596
)
 
(57
)
Payroll taxes paid upon unit net settlements
(102
)
 
(8
)
 
(94
)
Cash distributions to unitholders
(6,103
)
 
12

 
(6,115
)
  Cash distributions to fund investors, net of distributions to Partnership
(6,323
)
 
17,614

 
(23,937
)
  Capital call - ORM Timber Funds, net of Partnership contribution
92,280

 
91,455

 
825

Cash provided by (used in) financing activities
98,958

 
122,965

 
(24,007
)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and restricted cash
$
(1
)
 
$
(1,936
)
 
$
1,935

 
The increase in cash from operating activities of $12.7 million resulted primarily from a 27% increase in timber harvest volume, including timber deed sales, a 23% rise in average log price realizations, lower Real Estate project expenditures of $3.1 million, and a decrease in environmental remediation expenditures of $3.4 million.
 
Cash from investing activities during 2018 decreased by $137.6 million compared to 2017 due primarily to the acquisition of a two tree farms by the Fund IV in January 2018. In addition, Fund II sold one of its tree farms in January 2017.
 
Cash from financing activities increased in the current year by $123.0 million due primarily to capital calls for Fund IV’s two tree farm acquisitions, net borrowings under credit facilities, and the 2017 distribution of the net proceeds from the sale of one of Fund II’s tree farms to that fund’s investors which had no counterpart in 2018.
 
Seasonality
 
Timber - Partnership and Funds.  The elevation and terrain characteristics of our timberlands are such that we can conduct harvest operations virtually year-round on a significant portion of our tree farms. Generally, we concentrate our harvests from these areas in those months when weather limits operations on other properties, thus taking advantage of reduced competition for log supply to our customers and improving prices realized. As such, on a combined basis, the pattern of quarterly volumes harvested is flatter than would be the case if looking at one tree farm in isolation. However, this pattern may not hold true during periods of comparatively strong log prices, when we may accelerate harvest volume, or soft log prices, when we may defer harvest volume. In addition, our quarterly harvest patterns may be impacted by severe weather or fire conditions.
 

31


Timberland Investment Management. Management revenue generated by this segment consists of asset and timberland management fees. These fees, which relate primarily to our activities on behalf of the Funds and are eliminated in consolidation, vary based upon the amount of invested capital, the number of acres owned by the Funds, and the volume of timber harvested from properties owned by the Funds and are not expected to be significantly seasonal.
 
Real Estate. While Real Estate results are not expected to be seasonal, the nature of the activities in this segment will likely result in periodic large transactions that will have significant positive impacts on both revenue and operating income of the Partnership in periods in which these transactions close, and relatively limited revenue and operating income in other periods. While the variability of these results is not primarily a function of seasonal weather patterns, we do expect to see some seasonal fluctuations in this segment because of the general effects of weather on Pacific Northwest development activities.

Capital Expenditures and Commitments
 
Capital expenditures, excluding timberland acquisitions, for the full year 2018 are projected to be approximately $10.4 million. The most significant expenditures relate to finishing residential lots for sale to merchant homebuilders in our Harbor Hill project, and reforestation and roads. The following table presents our capital expenditures by major category on a year-to-date basis and what we expect for the remainder of the year:
 
 
 
2018
 
 
 
June 30 YTD
 
Remainder of Year
 
Total
in millions
 
 
 
 
 
Harbor Hill project development
$
1.2

 
$
4.7

 
$
5.9

Reforestation and roads - Partnership
1.1

 
0.5

 
1.6

Reforestation and roads - Funds
0.8

 
0.9

 
1.7

Other
0.5

 
1.8

 
2.3

 
$
3.6

 
$
7.9

 
$
11.5


ACCOUNTING MATTERS
 
Critical Accounting Estimates
 
An accounting estimate is deemed to be critical if it requires us to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimate is made, and also if different estimates that we reasonably could have used for the accounting estimate in the current period, or changes in the accounting estimate that are reasonably likely to occur from period to period, would have a material impact on the presentation of the Company’s financial condition, changes in financial condition, or results of operations. The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain amounts reported in the financial statements and related disclosures. Actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions. Management believes its most critical accounting policies and estimates relate to the cost allocation of purchased timberland, timber depletion, and environmental remediation liabilities.
 
For a further discussion of our critical accounting estimates, see Accounting Matters in the Management Discussion and Analysis section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. See also note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
 
Interest Rate Risk
 
The consolidated fixed-rate debt outstanding had a fair value of approximately $102.0 million and $104.6 million at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, based on the prevailing interest rates for similar financial instruments. A change in interest rate on fixed-rate debt will affect the fair value of debt, whereas a change in the interest rate on variable-rate debt will affect interest expense and cash flows payable by the Partnership. A hypothetical 1% change in prevailing interest rates would change the fair value of fixed-rate long-term debt obligations by $2.7 million and result in a $460,000 change in

32


annual interest expense from our variable-rate debt. We are not subject to material foreign currency risk, derivative risk, or similar uncertainties.
 

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
The Partnership’s management maintains a system of internal control over financial reporting, which management views as adequate to promote the timely identification and reporting of material, relevant information. Those controls include (1) requiring executive management and all managers in accounting roles to sign and adhere to a Code of Conduct and (2) implementation of a confidential hotline for employees to contact the Audit Committee directly with financial reporting concerns. Additionally, the Partnership’s senior management team meets regularly to discuss significant transactions and events affecting the Partnership’s operations and to assess the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. The Partnership’s principal executive and principal financial officers lead these meetings and consider whether topics discussed represent information that should be disclosed under generally accepted accounting principles and the rules of the SEC. The Board of Directors of the Partnership’s general partner includes an Audit Committee. The Audit Committee reviews the earnings release and all reports on Form 10-Q and 10-K prior to their filing. The Audit Committee is responsible for hiring the Partnership’s external auditors and meets with those auditors at least four times each year, including regularly scheduled executive sessions outside the presence of management.

Our executive officers are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures. They have designed such controls to ensure that others make all material information known to them within the organization. Management regularly evaluates ways to improve internal controls.

As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q our principal executive and principal financial officers completed an evaluation of the disclosure controls and procedures and have determined them to be effective. There have been no changes to internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


33


PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
 
From time to time, the Partnership may be subject to legal proceedings and claims that may have a material adverse impact on its business. Management is not aware of any current legal proceedings or claims that are expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse impact on our business, prospects, financial condition or results of operations.

As we have disclosed previously, we filed suit against the Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) seeking contribution to cleanup costs for the environmental remediation of the Port Gamble site. On May 24, 2018, the Washington State Supreme Court ruled that DNR is not liable under Washington’s Model Toxics Control Act as an owner or operator of the site. On June 13, 2018, we filed a motion for reconsideration.

In 2015, the Partnership filed a lawsuit seeking coverage under Pope & Talbot’s (P&T) insurance policies at the time it acquired the Port Gamble site from P&T. Pursuant to an order from P&T’s bankruptcy court, the Partnership later amended its complaint to add claims against P&T and P&T’s historical liability insurers. The Partnership is seeking to obtain a judgment against P&T and to enforce that judgment against any applicable insurance coverage available through P&T’s carriers. The litigation is currently pending in King County Superior Court.
 
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Risks Related to Our Industry and Our Markets

Our Partnership Timber and Funds Timber segments are sensitive to demand and price issues relating to our sales of logs in both domestic and foreign markets. We generate timber revenue in these segments primarily by selling softwood logs to domestic mills and to third-party intermediaries who resell them to the export market. The domestic market for logs in our operating area depends heavily on U.S. housing starts. The U.S. housing market has been in recovery for several years, but to the extent this recovery should stall, such a turn of events could have a negative impact on our operating results. For example, interest rates are widely expected to rise in the coming periods. Should this occur, it could have a negative impact on the U.S. housing market. Similarly, the impact of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on housing starts cannot readily be determined. Demand from export markets for Pacific Northwest logs are affected by fluctuations in the economies of the United States, Japan, China, and to a lesser degree, Korea; the foreign currency exchange rate between the currencies of these Asian countries and the U.S. dollar; and by ocean transportation costs. Further, the prices we realize for our logs depend in part upon competition, including the supply of logs from Canada that can be impacted by fluctuations in currency exchange rates and trade relations between the U.S., Canada, and China. The U.S. recently announced tariffs on lumber imported from Canada, with the intention of making U.S.-sourced lumber more competitive. An indirect effect of the tariffs could be support for U.S. log prices.

Our Partnership Timber, Funds Timber, and Timberland Investment Management (TIM) segments are highly dependent upon sales of commodity products. Revenue from our forestry operations is widely available from producers in other regions of the United States, as well as Canada and a number of other countries. We do not normally hedge against the financial risks associated with this condition. We are therefore subject to risks associated with the production of commonly available products, such that an increase in supply from abroad as a result of overproduction by competitors in other nations or as a result of changes in currency exchange rates, may reduce the demand for our products in some or all of the markets in which we do business. A bilateral agreement between the United States and Canada, called the Softwood Lumber agreement, had been intended to help manage potentially harmful effects of international competition between our countries, but that agreement expired in October 2015. In December 2017, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) ruled that the U.S. lumber industry was injured by Canadian lumber imports. The final ruling resulted in countervailing duties (CVD) and anti-dumping duties (ADD) on Canadian lumber shipments to the U.S. The expected net effect of these CV/AD duties is upward price pressure for sawlog producers in the Pacific Northwest, though management cannot predict accurately the precise effects. Similarly, we have seen or may experience an increase in supply or a reduction in demand as a result of international tensions or competition that is beyond our control and that may not be predictable.
 
Consolidation of sawmills in our geographic operating area may reduce competition among our customers, which could adversely affect our log prices. In the past we have experienced, and may continue to experience, consolidation of sawmills and other wood products manufacturing facilities in the Pacific Northwest. Because a portion of our cost of sales in our Timber segments consists of transportation costs for delivery of logs to domestic sawmills, it could become increasingly expensive to transport logs over longer distances for sales in domestic markets. As a result, a reduction in the number of sawmills, or in the number of sawmill operators, may reduce competition for our logs, increase transportation costs, or both.

34


These consolidations thus may have a material adverse impact upon our Timber segments’ revenue, income, or cash flow and, as those segments have traditionally represented our largest business unit, upon our results of operation and financial condition as a whole. Any such material adverse impact on timber revenue, income, and cash flow as a result of regional mill consolidations will also indirectly affect our TIM segment in the context of raising capital for investment in Pacific Northwest-based timber funds.

We are subject to statutory and regulatory restrictions that currently limit, and may increasingly limit, our ability to generate income and cash flow. Our ability to grow and harvest timber can be impacted significantly by legislation, regulations, or court rulings that restrict or stop forest practices. For example, events that focus media attention upon natural disasters and damage to timberlands have at various times brought increasing public attention to forestry practices. Similarly, certain activist groups in Oregon are likely to continue to register ballot initiatives that would eliminate clearcutting, which is the predominant harvest practice across our geographic region. These and other activists also have proposed, and can be expected to continue proposing, bans on pesticides and various methods of applying pesticides, and attempt to inhibit other practices that are commonly used to promote efficient, sustainable forestry practices. While these initiatives have thus far failed to gain traction, such initiatives, alone or in combination, may limit the portion of our timberlands that is eligible for harvest, may make it more expensive or less efficient to harvest all or certain portions of our timberlands, or may restrict other aspects of our operations. Additional regulations, whether or not adopted in response to such events, may make it more difficult or expensive for us to harvest timber and may reduce the amount of harvestable timber on our properties. These and other restrictions on logging, planting, road building, fertilizing, managing competing vegetation, and other activities can increase the cost or reduce available inventory thereby reducing income and cash flow. Any such additional restrictions would likely have a similar effect on our TIM operations. We cannot offer assurances that we will not be alleged to have failed to comply with these regulations, or we may face a reduction in revenues or an increase in costs as a result of complying with newly adopted statutes, regulations and court or administrative decisions. These claims may take the form of individual or class action litigation, regulatory or enforcement proceedings, or both. Any such claims could result in substantial defense costs and divert management’s attention from the ongoing operation of our business, and if any such claims were successful, may result in substantial damage awards, fines, or civil penalties.

Environmental and other activist groups may have an adverse impact on the value of our assets or on our ability to generate revenues from our timberlands. In recent years we have seen an increase in activities by environmental groups, Native American tribes, and other activists in the legislative, administrative, and judicial processes that govern all aspects of our operations. For example, on more than one occasion, the Washington Department of Ecology applied more stringent regulatory standards to our existing environmental remediation project at Port Gamble, Washington, after soliciting or receiving input from tribal representatives. These revisions substantially increased the cost associated with our pre-existing remediation plans, and we cannot offer assurances that similar actions will not further protract the process or increase remediation costs. In an ongoing example of this activism, various citizens’ and tribal groups are asserting, in their capacities as alleged trustees under the Natural Resources Damages Act, that we are liable for damages to the environment on the basis of our now largely remediated property at Port Gamble, Washington. Similarly, citizens’ and environmental groups have significant influence in the entitlement and zoning processes that affect our Real Estate operations. These activities are not likely to diminish in the foreseeable future, and in some instances may have a material impact upon the revenues we can generate from our properties or upon the costs of generating those revenues.

Our businesses are highly dependent upon domestic and international macroeconomic factors. Both our timberland operations and our real estate operations are highly influenced by housing markets. Our Partnership Timber, Funds Timber, and TIM segments depend upon housing and construction markets in the United States and in other Pacific Rim countries, and our geographic concentration in the Pacific Northwest increases our exposure to economic, labor, and shipping risks that are tied to this particular area. Similarly, our Real Estate segment depends upon a highly localized demand in the Puget Sound region of western Washington. Factors that affect these markets will have a disproportionate impact on our business, and may be difficult or impossible to predict or estimate accurately.

We face increasing competition from engineered and recycled products. Our Partnership Timber, Funds Timber, and TIM segments derive substantially all of their revenues from the market for softwood logs and wood products derived from them. Recent years have witnessed the emergence of plastic, fiberglass, wood composite, and recycled products, as well as metal products in certain industries, that may have the effect of reducing demand for our products. As these products evolve, and as other competitive products may be developed, we may face a decline in log price realizations that would have an adverse impact on our revenues, earnings, cash flow, and the value of our assets.

As a property owner and seller, we face environmental risks associated with events that occur or that may be alleged to have occurred on our properties. Various federal and state environmental laws in the states in which we operate place liability for environmental contamination on the current and former owners of real estate on which contamination is

35


discovered. These laws are often a source of “strict liability,” meaning that an owner or operator need not necessarily have caused, or even been aware of, the release of hazardous substances. Such a circumstance applies to our operations at Port Gamble, Washington, for example, where contamination occurred prior to the formation of the Partnership. If hazardous substances are discovered or are alleged to have been released on property that we currently own or operate, that we have owned or operated in the past, or that we acquire or operate in the future, we may be subject to liability for the cost of remediating these properties without regard for our conduct or our knowledge of the events that led to the contamination or alleged contamination. These events would likely increase our expenses and might, in some cases, make it more difficult or impossible for us to continue operating our timberlands or to sell parcels of real estate for a price we would deem reasonable.

Risks Relating to Our Operations

We have certain environmental remediation liabilities associated with our Port Gamble property, and that liability may increase. We currently own certain real estate at Port Gamble on the Kitsap Peninsula in western Washington. Sediments adjacent to these properties were alleged to have been impacted by operations of the former owner of the property, Pope & Talbot, Inc (P&T). However, as current owner of Port Gamble, we have environmental liability for these properties under Washington State’s Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA). In December 2013, we reached an agreement with the Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) in the form of a consent decree (“CD”) and clean-up action plan (“CAP”) that provides for the cleanup of Port Gamble Bay. Together, these documents outline the terms under which the Partnership will conduct environmental remediation as well as the specific clean-up activities to be performed. The CD and CAP were filed with the Kitsap County Superior Court in December 2013. In February 2018, the Partnership and DOE entered into an agreed order with respect to the millsite under which the Partnership will perform a remedial investigation and feasibility study and develop a CAP. As with the in-water portion of the project, the CAP will define the scope of the remediation activity for the millsite.

We are pursuing contribution of costs under P&T’s insurance policies, though there can be no assurance that we will prevail in this matter. The recorded liability does not reflect any contribution by P&T’s insurance policies. Additionally, certain environmental laws allow state, federal, and tribal trustees (collectively, the Trustees) to bring suit against property owners to recover damages for injuries to natural resources (NRD). Like the liability that attaches to current property owners in the cleanup context, liability for natural resource damages can attach to a property owner simply because an injury to natural resources resulted from releases of hazardous substances on that owner’s property, regardless of culpability for the release. The Trustees are alleging that Pope Resources has NRD liability because of releases that occurred on its property. We have been in discussions with the Trustees regarding their claims, and the alleged conditions in Port Gamble Bay. We have also been discussing restoration alternatives that might address the damages the Trustees allege. Discussions with the Trustees may result in an obligation for us to fund NRD assessment and restoration activities that are greater than we have estimated.

Management continues to monitor the Port Gamble cleanup processes closely. The $7.0 million remediation accrual as of June 30, 2018, represents our current estimate of the remaining cleanup cost and most likely outcome to various contingencies, though it is reasonably possible that the millsite cleanup and NRD components of the liability may increase. These estimates are predicated upon a variety of factors, including the actual amount of the ultimate cleanup costs. The liability is based upon a number of estimates and judgments that are subject to change as the project progresses. There may be additional litigation costs if we cannot reach a settlement with DNR, and the outcome of any such litigation is uncertain. The filing of the CD limits our legal exposure for matters covered by the decree, but does not eliminate it entirely. DOE reserves the right to reopen the CD if new information regarding factors previously unknown to the agency requires further remedial action. While unlikely, a reopening of the CD may result in adverse financial impacts and may have the effect of distracting management and other key personnel from the day to day operation of our business. These factors, alone or in combination with other challenges, may have a material adverse effect upon our assets, income, cash flow, and operations.

Our leverage may give rise to additional risks. The Partnership’s total outstanding debt was $89.9 million at June 30, 2018, of which $46.0 million bears interest at variable rates, with the remaining balance at fixed rates. This debt, particularly that portion that carries variable interest rates, exposes us to certain additional risks, including the possibility that we may face additional interest expense, particularly in an economic environment that includes rising interest rates, as are expected in the United States in coming periods. In addition, generally speaking, an increase in our indebtedness may limit our ability to defer timber harvests and potentially restricts our flexibility to take advantage of other investment opportunities that might otherwise benefit our business. In extreme cases, we could be placed in a position in which we default under one or more of our credit arrangements, which could require us to pledge additional portions of our timberland as collateral for our indebtedness or which might require us to take other actions or expose us to other remedies that could have a material adverse effect upon our assets, operations, or business.


36


Our real estate holdings are highly illiquid, and changes in economic and regulatory factors may affect the value of our properties or the timing of the proceeds, if any, that we expect to receive on the sale of such properties. The value of our real estate investments, and our income from Real Estate operations, is sensitive to changes in the economic and regulatory environment, as well as various land-use regulations and development risks, including the ability to obtain the necessary permits and land entitlements that would allow us to maximize the revenue from our real estate investments. Our real estate investments are long-term in nature, which raises the risk that unforeseen changes in the economy or laws surrounding development activities may have an adverse effect on our investments. These investments often are highly illiquid and thus may not generate cash flow if and when needed to support our other operations. Further, we occasionally announce contracts relating to the sale of our real estate holdings, but those agreements may contain contingencies and conditions that may delay or prevent the consummation of transactions even after we have agreed to sale terms.

Our operations are geographically concentrated, and we may face greater impacts from localized events than would more geographically diverse timber companies. Because our operations are conducted exclusively west of the Cascade Mountains of the Pacific Northwest, between northern California and the Canadian border, regionalized events and conditions may have a more pronounced impact upon our operations than they might upon a more geographically diverse timber company. For example, disease and insect infestations tend to be local or regional in scope, and because our Timber and TIM businesses are geographically concentrated, events of this nature may affect our operations more significantly than they might a similarly situated company whose operations are more widely dispersed. Similarly, because the vast majority of our Real Estate operations are limited to the Puget Sound region of western Washington, regional impacts such as growth patterns, weather patterns, and natural disasters, as well as socio-political events such as environmental and land use initiatives, may disproportionately affect that segment more significantly than a company whose operations are less concentrated.

Our timber investment fund business depends upon establishing and maintaining a strong reputation among investors, and on our ability to maintain strong relationships with existing and prospective investors in our Funds. Our ability to expand our operations using our private equity timber fund strategy depends, to a significant degree, upon our ability to maintain and develop our expertise in managing timberlands in a manner that generates investment returns for prospective Fund investors. Events or conditions that adversely impact this capacity, including events that damage our reputation or our relationship with Fund investors, may make it more difficult to grow our operations using this strategy, and in some instances, may result in actual or alleged liability to our investors. Any such events may cause a reduction in our revenues or may cause us to realize less than the optimum potential of our assets.

We compete with a number of larger competitors that may be better able than we to absorb price fluctuations, may be able to expend greater resources on production, may have greater access to capital, and may operate more efficiently than we can. We compete against much larger companies in each of our business segments. We compete with these companies for management and line personnel, as well as for purchases of relatively scarce assets such as land and standing timber and for sales of our products. These larger competitors may have access to larger amounts of capital and significantly greater economies of scale, and they may be better able to absorb the risks inherent in our line of business. Moreover, the timber industry has experienced consolidation in recent years and, as that consolidation occurs, our relative market share decreases and the relative financial capacity of our competitors increases. While management believes the Partnership is at a competitive advantage over some of these companies because of our lack of vertical integration into forest products manufacturing, our advantageous tax structure, and management’s attempts to diversify our asset base, we cannot assure investors that competition will not have a material and adverse effect on our results of operations or our financial condition.

We and our customers are dependent upon active credit markets to fund operations. We sell logs from our Timber segments to mills and log brokers that, in most circumstances, rely upon an active credit market to fund their operations. Our Real Estate sales are also often dependent upon credit markets in order to fund acquisitions. To the extent borrowing restrictions impinge on customers’ access to debt, we expect those customers to respond by reducing their expenditures, and those reductions may have the effect of directly reducing our revenues and of indirectly reducing the demand for our products. Any such outcomes could materially and adversely impact our results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition.

We may incur losses as a result of natural disasters that may occur on our properties. Forests are subject to a number of natural hazards, including damage by fire, severe windstorms, insects, disease, flooding, and landslides. Changes in global climate conditions may intensify these natural hazards. Severe weather conditions and other natural disasters can also reduce the productivity of timberlands and disrupt the harvesting and delivery of forest products. While damage from natural causes is typically localized and would normally affect only a small portion of our timberlands at any one time, these hazards are unpredictable and losses might not be so limited. While we carry fire insurance on approximately 28% of our Combined timberland acres, we do not otherwise maintain insurance against loss of standing timber on our timberlands due to natural disasters.

37



We rely on experienced contract loggers and truckers who are at times in short supply and who may seek consistent work. We rely on contract loggers and truckers for the production and transportation, respectively, of our products to customers. The pool of available contractors is limited and can result in an increase in harvest and haul costs, or harvest constraints, as harvest volumes increase regionally. In addition, contractors may value continuity of work which influences contractor availability and the selection of contract bidders. A commitment to more continuous work could reduce our flexibility to time markets, affecting total returns.

Risks Relating to Ownership of Our Securities

We are controlled by our managing general partner. As a master limited partnership, substantially all of our day-to-day affairs are controlled by our managing general partner, Pope MGP, Inc. The board of directors of Pope MGP, Inc. serves as our board of directors and, by virtue of a stockholder agreement, each of the two controlling shareholders of Pope MGP, Inc. have the ability to designate one of our directors and jointly appoint two others, with the fifth board position taken by our chief executive officer, who serves as a director by virtue of his executive position. Unitholders may remove the managing general partner only in limited circumstances, including, among other things, a vote by the holders of a two-thirds majority of the “qualifying units,” which generally means the units that have been owned by their respective holders for at least five years prior to such vote. By virtue of the terms of our agreement of limited partnership, as amended, or “partnership agreement”, our managing general partner directly, and the general partner shareholders indirectly, have the ability to do the following: prevent or impede transactions that would result in a change of control of the Partnership; prevent or, upon the approval of limited partners holding a majority of the units, cause the sale of the assets of the Partnership; and cause the Partnership to take or refrain from taking certain other actions that one might otherwise perceive to be in the Partnership’s best interest. Under our partnership agreement, we are required to pay to Pope MGP, Inc. an annual management fee of $150,000, and to reimburse Pope MGP, Inc. for certain expenses incurred in managing our business.

We may incur expenses relating to a recently announced activism campaign from one of our unitholders. On June 18, 2018, James H. Dahl and an individual related to him filed a report on Securities Exchange Act Schedule 13D, reporting beneficial ownership in excess of 5% of our outstanding limited partner units, and contending that the Partnership is “materially undervalued in the marketplace” by virtue of its governance structure. The investor expressed a belief that the Partnership should restructure its operations or explore a “strategic transaction,” and contended that management and the General Partner are “entrenched.” Further, the investor’s Schedule 13D also suggested that other unitholders contact management to offer their views about the Partnership’s strategic direction. To date, stimulated by the 13D, a handful of unitholders have communicated their thoughts to the board and management. Consistent with our regular engagement practices, we have simultaneously engaged proactively with a number of longstanding unitholders. The board is digesting this unitholder feedback and will continue its longstanding practice of engaging with investors and considering the input those investors provide.

Activism campaigns against public companies have become increasingly commonplace in recent years, and even those that are unsuccessful have had material adverse impacts upon targeted companies and their securityholders. In the case of Pope Resources, the announcement of the recent activism initiative may have one or more of the following effects:

•
Increasing professional fees and costs and other general and administrative expenses.
•
Distracting management and the board from the Partnership’s day to day operations.
•
Creating uncertainty among key employees, which in turn may increase the risk of either losing one or more such employees, or the Partnership’s cost of retaining them.
•
Increasing the Partnership’s litigation risk, and the accompanying insurance and compliance costs.
•
Increasing the volatility in the trading price and trading volume of the Partnership’s units.

We have a limited market capitalization and a relatively low historic trading volume, as a result of which the trading prices of our units may be more volatile than would an investment in a more liquid security. Our relatively small public float and our limited trading volume may, in some instances, make trading in our units more volatile, as a result of which our price may deviate more significantly, and opportunities to buy or sell our units may be more limited, than investors might experience with a more liquid security. This circumstance may be magnified during times of significant or prolonged selling pressure on our securities. Further, we are simultaneously maintaining both a distribution reinvestment plan, which may have the effect of increasing the number of outstanding units, and a unit repurchase plan, which has had and may continue to have the effect of reducing the number of outstanding units. These factors together make it difficult to predict the effect, if any, on our liquidity or our market capitalization.


38


We benefit from certain tax treatment accorded to master limited partnerships, and if that status changes the holders of our units may realize less advantageous tax consequences. The Partnership is a Master Limited Partnership and is therefore not generally subject to U.S. federal income taxes. If a change in tax law (or interpretation of current tax law) caused the Partnership to become subject to income taxes, operating results would be adversely affected. We also have a handful of taxable subsidiaries. The estimation of income tax expense and preparation of income tax returns requires complex calculations and judgments. We believe the estimates and calculations used in this process are proper and reasonable and more likely than not would be sustained under examination by federal or state tax authorities; however, if a federal or state taxing authority disagreed with the positions we have taken, a material change in provision for income taxes, net income, or cash flows could result.
 
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
 
(a) - (e) None

    
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
Period
(a) Total Number of Units Purchased
(b) Average Price Paid per Unit
(c) Total Number of Units Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1)
(d) Maximum Approximate Dollar Value of Units that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
 
 
 
 
 
April 2018
1,282
$70.61
1,282
$813,000
May 2018
993
$71.92
993
$741,000
June 2018
2,716
$73.31
2,716
$542,000
(1) Units purchased pursuant to plan adopted under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and announced publicly on May 30, 2017, and extended and expanded on December 7, 2017. The plan allows for the repurchase of units with an aggregate value of up to $2.5 million through December 7, 2018.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
 
None
 
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
 
None
 
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
 
There have been no material changes in the procedures for shareholders of the Partnership’s general partner to nominate directors to the board.


39



ITEM 6. Exhibits
 
Exhibits.

31.1
 
 
31.2
 
 
32.1
 
 
32.2
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document
 
 
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
 
 
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
 
 
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
 
 
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
 
 
101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

40


SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on August 8, 2018.
 
 
POPE RESOURCES,
 
A Delaware Limited Partnership
 
 
 
 
By:
POPE MGP, Inc.
 
 
Managing General Partner
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:  /s/ Thomas M. Ringo
 
 
Thomas M. Ringo
 
 
President and Chief Executive Officer
 
 
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:  /s/ Daemon P. Repp
 
 
Daemon P. Repp
 
 
Director of Finance
 
 
(Principal Financial Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By: /s/ Sean M. Tallarico
 
 
Sean M. Tallarico
 
 
Controller
 
 
(Principal Accounting Officer)


41
Exhibit


Exhibit 31.1
 
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 
I, Thomas M. Ringo, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pope Resources;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a–15(f) and 15d–15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:
August 8, 2018
/s/Thomas M. Ringo 
 
 
Thomas M. Ringo
Chief Executive Officer


Exhibit


Exhibit 31.2
 
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 
I, Daemon P. Repp, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pope Resources;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a–15(f) and 15d–15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:
August 8, 2018
/s/ Daemon P. Repp
 
 
Daemon P. Repp
Director of Finance


Exhibit


Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pope Resources (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas M. Ringo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any of the Company’s filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise be deemed to be filed as part of the Report or under such Acts.




/s/ Thomas M. Ringo
Thomas M. Ringo
Chief Executive Officer


August 8, 2018


Exhibit


Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pope Resources (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daemon P. Repp, Director of Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any of the Company’s filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise be deemed to be filed as part of the Report or under such Acts.



/s/ Daemon P. Repp
Daemon P. Repp
Director of Finance


August 8, 2018